Misplaced Pages

Xionites: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:38, 29 August 2019 editHistoryofIran (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers97,607 edits rv← Previous edit Revision as of 17:56, 4 September 2019 edit undoBender235 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors471,674 editsm Typo fixing, typo(s) fixed: king’s → king'sTag: AWBNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Iranian-speaking nomadic people}}
{{distinguish|Zion (disambiguation){{!}}Zionites|Xiongnu}} {{distinguish|Zion (disambiguation){{!}}Zionites|Xiongnu}}
{{short description|Iranian-speaking nomadic people}}
] ]
{{History of Kyrgyzstan}} {{History of Kyrgyzstan}}
Line 6: Line 6:
'''Xionites''', '''Chionites''', or '''Chionitae''' (]: ''Xiyōn'' or ''Hiyōn''; Avestan: ''Xiiaona''; ] ''xwn''; ] ''Xyon'') are ] of the ] of a nomadic people who were prominent in ], ] and ] during the 4th and 7th centuries CE.<ref name="W.Felix">{{cite encyclopedia |last= Felix |first=Wolfgang | title= CHIONITES | encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica Online Edition | accessdate=2012-09-03|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/chionites-lat}}</ref> '''Xionites''', '''Chionites''', or '''Chionitae''' (]: ''Xiyōn'' or ''Hiyōn''; Avestan: ''Xiiaona''; ] ''xwn''; ] ''Xyon'') are ] of the ] of a nomadic people who were prominent in ], ] and ] during the 4th and 7th centuries CE.<ref name="W.Felix">{{cite encyclopedia |last= Felix |first=Wolfgang | title= CHIONITES | encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica Online Edition | accessdate=2012-09-03|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/chionites-lat}}</ref>


The Xionites appear to be synonymous with the ]s of ],<ref> Hyun Jin Kim, 2013, ''The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe'', Cambridge UK/New York, ], pp. 5, 36–38. </ref> and possibly also the ] of ]. It is unclear whether the Xionites were connected to a people named in ] as the '']'' (''Hünyü'' 獯鬻; ] ''Hsünyü''), ] 猃狁 (Wade–Giles ''Hsien-yün'') and ] (匈奴 Wade–Giles ''Hsiung-nu''). (While some sources use names such as Hunas, Huns and Xiongnu interchangeably, this remains controversial.) The Xionites appear to be synonymous with the ]s of ],<ref>Hyun Jin Kim, 2013, ''The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe'', Cambridge UK/New York, ], pp. 5, 36–38.</ref> and possibly also the ] of ]. It is unclear whether the Xionites were connected to a people named in ] as the '']'' (''Hünyü'' 獯鬻; ] ''Hsünyü''), ] 猃狁 (Wade–Giles ''Hsien-yün'') and ] (匈奴 Wade–Giles ''Hsiung-nu''). (While some sources use names such as Hunas, Huns and Xiongnu interchangeably, this remains controversial.)


They were first described by the Roman historian, ], who was in Bactria during 356-57 CE; he described the ''Chionitæ'' as living with the ].<ref>Original reports on the "Chionitae" by ]:<br>Mention with the Euseni/ ] : .<br>Mention with the ]: .<br>Mention with ]: <br>Mention at the ]: and </ref> Ammianus indicates that the Xionites had previously lived in Transoxiana and, after entering Bactria, became ]s of the Kushans, were influenced culturally by them and had adopted the ]. They had attacked the ],<ref name="W.Felix" /><ref name="LINK">{{cite encyclopedia |last= Shapur Shahbazi |first= A | title= SASANIAN DYNASTY | encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica Online Edition | accessdate=2012-09-03|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/sasanian-dynasty}}</ref> but later (led by a chief named ]), served as mercenaries in the Sassanian army. They were first described by the Roman historian, ], who was in Bactria during 356-57 CE; he described the ''Chionitæ'' as living with the ].<ref>Original reports on the "Chionitae" by ]:<br>Mention with the Euseni/ ] : .<br>Mention with the ]: .<br>Mention with ]: <br>Mention at the ]: and </ref> Ammianus indicates that the Xionites had previously lived in Transoxiana and, after entering Bactria, became ]s of the Kushans, were influenced culturally by them and had adopted the ]. They had attacked the ],<ref name="W.Felix" /><ref name="LINK">{{cite encyclopedia |last= Shapur Shahbazi |first= A | title= SASANIAN DYNASTY | encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Iranica Online Edition | accessdate=2012-09-03|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/sasanian-dynasty}}</ref> but later (led by a chief named ]), served as mercenaries in the Sassanian army.


Within the Xionites, there seem to have been two main subgroups, which were known in the ] by names such as '']'' and '']''. The prefixes ''karmir'' ("red") and ''speta'' ("white") likely refer to Central Asian traditions in which particular ]. The ''Karmir Xyon'' were known in European sources as the ''Kermichiones'' or "Red Huns", and some scholars have identified them with the ] and/or ]. The ''Spet Xyon'' or "White Huns" appear to have been the known in India by the cognate name ''Sveta-huna'', and are often identified, controversially, with the ]. Within the Xionites, there seem to have been two main subgroups, which were known in the ] by names such as '']'' and '']''. The prefixes ''karmir'' ("red") and ''speta'' ("white") likely refer to Central Asian traditions in which particular ]. The ''Karmir Xyon'' were known in European sources as the ''Kermichiones'' or "Red Huns", and some scholars have identified them with the ] and/or ]. The ''Spet Xyon'' or "White Huns" appear to have been the known in India by the cognate name ''Sveta-huna'', and are often identified, controversially, with the ].


== Origins and culture == == Origins and culture ==
Line 16: Line 16:
] horseman on ] bowl, 460-479 CE.<ref></ref>]] ] horseman on ] bowl, 460-479 CE.<ref></ref>]]


The original culture of the Xionites and their geographical ] are uncertain. They appear to have originally followed ] religious beliefs,{{cn|date=October 2017}} which mixed later with varieties of ] {{cn|date=October 2017}} and ].{{cn|date=October 2017}} It is difficult to determine their ethnic composition.<ref name="W.Felix" /> The original culture of the Xionites and their geographical ] are uncertain. They appear to have originally followed ] religious beliefs,{{citation needed|date=October 2017}} which mixed later with varieties of ] {{citation needed|date=October 2017}} and ].{{citation needed|date=October 2017}} It is difficult to determine their ethnic composition.<ref name="W.Felix" />
<br>


Ancient Greek and Roman sources, such as ], ] and ], appear to distinguish between the Xionites and the ]s. However, some modern scholars, such as ] (1991), believe that the Hepthalites were a prominent subgroup of Xionites.<ref>]; </ref> Ancient Greek and Roman sources, such as ], ] and ], appear to distinguish between the Xionites and the ]s. However, some modern scholars, such as ] (1991), believe that the Hepthalites were a prominent subgroup of Xionites.<ref>]; </ref>
Line 36: Line 35:
|jstor = 609313 |jstor = 609313
|via = ] |via = ]
}}</ref> Macartney also considered that the name Chyon was later "replaced by that of the... Kidarite Huns". (However, he also claimed, erroneously, that "the Kidarites were... identical with the Kushan", when the Kushan Empire had been destroyed by the Xionites and/or Hunas in the mid-4th Century.) Macartney also considered the question of the identity of the ''Karmir Xyon'' or Kermichiones, saying that that they could not have been "the true Turks" (the ], who appear to have entered history on the western steppe, when "their embassy reached Constantinople... in 568". Macartney adds that the ] of the Turks at the time was Silzabul, Dizabul or Istämi, but the ruler of the ''Karmir Xyon'' was Askílt (Aσκήλτ, often romanised as ''Scultor''). "Neither can they have been the ] ... nor the Epthalites , who were well known to the Byzantines and would not have been described in this way. Moreover, the Epthalites were known as White Huns, and... Karmir Xyon, meaning Red Chyon, occurs in a Pahlavi text in juxtaposition with Spet Xyon, White Chyon".{{cn|date=June 2018}} }}</ref> Macartney also considered that the name Chyon was later "replaced by that of the... Kidarite Huns". (However, he also claimed, erroneously, that "the Kidarites were... identical with the Kushan", when the Kushan Empire had been destroyed by the Xionites and/or Hunas in the mid-4th Century.) Macartney also considered the question of the identity of the ''Karmir Xyon'' or Kermichiones, saying that that they could not have been "the true Turks" (the ], who appear to have entered history on the western steppe, when "their embassy reached Constantinople... in 568". Macartney adds that the ] of the Turks at the time was Silzabul, Dizabul or Istämi, but the ruler of the ''Karmir Xyon'' was Askílt (Aσκήλτ, often romanised as ''Scultor''). "Neither can they have been the ] ... nor the Epthalites , who were well known to the Byzantines and would not have been described in this way. Moreover, the Epthalites were known as White Huns, and... Karmir Xyon, meaning Red Chyon, occurs in a Pahlavi text in juxtaposition with Spet Xyon, White Chyon".{{citation needed|date=June 2018}}


At least some Turkic tribes were involved in the formation of the Xionites, despite their later character as an ], according to Richard Nelson Frye (1991): "Just as later nomadic empires were confederations of many peoples, we may tentatively propose that the ruling groups of these invaders were, or at least included, Turkic-speaking tribesmen from the east and north, although most probably the bulk of the people in the confederation of Chionites... spoke an Iranian language.... This was the last time in the history of Central Asia that Iranian-speaking nomads played any role; hereafter all nomads would speak Turkic languages".<ref>], "''Pre-Islamic and early Islamic cultures in Central Asia''" in "''Turko-Persia in historical perspective''", edited by , Cambridge University Press, 1991. pg 49.</ref> At least some Turkic tribes were involved in the formation of the Xionites, despite their later character as an ], according to Richard Nelson Frye (1991): "Just as later nomadic empires were confederations of many peoples, we may tentatively propose that the ruling groups of these invaders were, or at least included, Turkic-speaking tribesmen from the east and north, although most probably the bulk of the people in the confederation of Chionites... spoke an Iranian language.... This was the last time in the history of Central Asia that Iranian-speaking nomads played any role; hereafter all nomads would speak Turkic languages".<ref>], "''Pre-Islamic and early Islamic cultures in Central Asia''" in "''Turko-Persia in historical perspective''", edited by , Cambridge University Press, 1991. pg 49.</ref>


The proposition that the Xionites probably originated as an Iranian tribe was put forward by Wolfgang Felix in ''Encyclopedia Iranica'' (1992).<ref name="W.Felix" /> The proposition that the Xionites probably originated as an Iranian tribe was put forward by Wolfgang Felix in ''Encyclopedia Iranica'' (1992).<ref name="W.Felix" />
<br>


In 2005, AS Shahbazi suggested that they were originally a ] who had mixed with Iranian tribes in Transoxiana and Bactria, where they adopted the ].<ref name="LINK" /><br> In 2005, AS Shahbazi suggested that they were originally a ] who had mixed with Iranian tribes in Transoxiana and Bactria, where they adopted the ].<ref name="LINK" />


The Xionites may have originated as a confederation of ] and/or ] tribes that collectively adopted Eastern Iranian languages and cultural practices, according to ] (2005).<ref> Peter B. Golden, 2005 "Turks and Iranians: a cultural sketch", in: Lars Johanson and Christiane Bulut (ed.), ''Turkic-Iranian Contact Areas: Historical and Linguistic Aspects'', Turcologica 62, Wiesbaden, p. 19.</ref> The Xionites may have originated as a confederation of ] and/or ] tribes that collectively adopted Eastern Iranian languages and cultural practices, according to ] (2005).<ref>Peter B. Golden, 2005 "Turks and Iranians: a cultural sketch", in: Lars Johanson and Christiane Bulut (ed.), ''Turkic-Iranian Contact Areas: Historical and Linguistic Aspects'', Turcologica 62, Wiesbaden, p. 19.</ref>


== History == == History ==
<!-- Commented out the following due to lack of relevance to this article and lack of sources; there is no known connection between the Xionites ''per se'' and the Caucasus, including the Caucasian Huns. Also these would be the earliest reference to any "Huns" anywhere. The ] John III ]etsi (c. 728) mentions the foundation of the town of ''Hunor'' (Hunoracerta) in the ] region established in 215 BC. The Armenian ] mentions also that there are ] living among the peoples of the ] in 227 AD.--> <!-- Commented out the following due to lack of relevance to this article and lack of sources; there is no known connection between the Xionites ''per se'' and the Caucasus, including the Caucasian Huns. Also these would be the earliest reference to any "Huns" anywhere. The ] John III ]etsi (c. 728) mentions the foundation of the town of ''Hunor'' (Hunoracerta) in the ] region established in 215 BC. The Armenian ] mentions also that there are ] living among the peoples of the ] in 227 AD.-->


The defeat of the Xiongnu in 89 CE by Chinese forces at the ] and subsequent Chinese campaigns against them, led by ] may have been a factor in the ethnogenesis of the Xionites and their migration into Central Asia. The defeat of the Xiongnu in 89 CE by Chinese forces at the ] and subsequent Chinese campaigns against them, led by ] may have been a factor in the ethnogenesis of the Xionites and their migration into Central Asia.


Xionite tribes reportedly organised themselves into four main hordes: "Black" or northern (beyond the ]), "Blue" or eastern (in Tianshan), "White" or western (possibly the ]), around ], and the "Red" or southern (] and/or ]), south of the ]. Artefacts found from the area they inhabited dating from their period indicate their totem animal seems to have been the (rein)deer. An inscription on the walls of the royal palace in Persepolis about Darius's empire calls them ''Hunae''. Xionite tribes reportedly organised themselves into four main hordes: "Black" or northern (beyond the ]), "Blue" or eastern (in Tianshan), "White" or western (possibly the ]), around ], and the "Red" or southern (] and/or ]), south of the ]. Artefacts found from the area they inhabited dating from their period indicate their totem animal seems to have been the (rein)deer. An inscription on the walls of the royal palace in Persepolis about Darius's empire calls them ''Hunae''.


The Xionites are best documented in southern ] from the late 4th century AD until the mid-5th century AD. The Xionites are best documented in southern ] from the late 4th century AD until the mid-5th century AD.


=== Kidarites === === Kidarites ===
Line 64: Line 62:


=== Clashes with the Sasanians === === Clashes with the Sasanians ===
Early confrontations between the ] of ] with the Xionites were described by ]: he reports that in 356 CE, Shapur II was taking his winter quarters on his eastern borders, "repelling the hostilities of the bordering tribes" of the Xionites and the ''Euseni'', a name often amended to ''Cuseni'' (meaning the ]).<ref>{{cite book |last1=Scheers |first1=Simone |last2=Quaegebeur |first2=Jan |title=Studia Paulo Naster Oblata: Orientalia antiqua |date=1982 |publisher=Peeters Publishers |isbn=9789070192105 |page=55 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GlsbsTTwxjYC&pg=PA55 |language=fr}}</ref><ref>Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History. London: Bohn (1862) </ref> Early confrontations between the ] of ] with the Xionites were described by ]: he reports that in 356 CE, Shapur II was taking his winter quarters on his eastern borders, "repelling the hostilities of the bordering tribes" of the Xionites and the ''Euseni'', a name often amended to ''Cuseni'' (meaning the ]).<ref>{{cite book |last1=Scheers |first1=Simone |last2=Quaegebeur |first2=Jan |title=Studia Paulo Naster Oblata: Orientalia antiqua |date=1982 |publisher=Peeters Publishers |isbn=9789070192105 |page=55 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GlsbsTTwxjYC&pg=PA55 |language=fr}}</ref><ref>Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History. London: Bohn (1862) </ref>


Shapur made a treaty of alliance with the Chionites and the Gelani in 358 CE.<ref>Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History. London: Bohn (1862) </ref> Shapur made a treaty of alliance with the Chionites and the Gelani in 358 CE.<ref>Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History. London: Bohn (1862) </ref>
Line 71: Line 69:
{{Main|Alchon}} {{Main|Alchon}}
] is suggested by a portrait of ], king of the ] c. 430 - 490 AD.<ref name="CC">The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila, Michael Maas </ref>]] ] is suggested by a portrait of ], king of the ] c. 430 - 490 AD.<ref name="CC">The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila, Michael Maas </ref>]]
In 460, ] reportedly united a ] ruling élite with elements of the ] and Xionites as ''Alchon'' (or ''Alχon''). {{cn|date=October 2017}} when.{{cn|date=October 2017}} In 460, ] reportedly united a ] ruling élite with elements of the ] and Xionites as ''Alchon'' (or ''Alχon''). {{citation needed|date=October 2017}} when.{{citation needed|date=October 2017}}


At the end of the 5th century the Alchon invaded North India where they were known as the ].{{cn|date=October 2017}} In India the Alchon were not distinguished from their immediate Hephthalite predecessors,{{cn|date=October 2017}} and both are known as Sveta-Hunas there.{{cn|date=October 2017}} Perhaps complimenting this term, ] (527-565) wrote that they were white skinned,{{cn|date=October 2017}} had an organized kingship, and that their life was not wild/nomadic and they lived in cities. At the end of the 5th century the Alchon invaded North India where they were known as the ].{{citation needed|date=October 2017}} In India the Alchon were not distinguished from their immediate Hephthalite predecessors,{{citation needed|date=October 2017}} and both are known as Sveta-Hunas there.{{citation needed|date=October 2017}} Perhaps complimenting this term, ] (527-565) wrote that they were white skinned,{{citation needed|date=October 2017}} had an organized kingship, and that their life was not wild/nomadic and they lived in cities.


<!-- The Avars/Varchonites of Eastern Europe may be associated with the Uar/Hephthalites, but not the Alchon. Commented out the following as WP:OR: The Alchon were called Varkhon or Varkunites {{dubious|date=October 2017}} (Ouar-Khonitai) by ] (538-582),{{cn|date=October 2017}} literally referring to the Uar and Hunnoi. Around 630, ] wrote that the European Avars were initially composed of two nations, the Uar and the Hunnoi {{which|date=October 2017}} tribes. He wrote that: "the Barsilt, the Unogurs and the Sabirs were struck with horror ... and honoured the newcomers with brilliant gifts...",<ref name="Simokattes">Theophilactus Simocatta, Historiae, -Ed. C. deBoor. Lipsiae, 1887, ps.251, 258</ref> when the Avars first arrived in their lands in 555AD.--> <!-- The Avars/Varchonites of Eastern Europe may be associated with the Uar/Hephthalites, but not the Alchon. Commented out the following as WP:OR: The Alchon were called Varkhon or Varkunites {{dubious|date=October 2017}} (Ouar-Khonitai) by ] (538-582),{{cn|date=October 2017}} literally referring to the Uar and Hunnoi. Around 630, ] wrote that the European Avars were initially composed of two nations, the Uar and the Hunnoi {{which|date=October 2017}} tribes. He wrote that: "the Barsilt, the Unogurs and the Sabirs were struck with horror ... and honoured the newcomers with brilliant gifts...",<ref name="Simokattes">Theophilactus Simocatta, Historiae, -Ed. C. deBoor. Lipsiae, 1887, ps.251, 258</ref> when the Avars first arrived in their lands in 555AD.-->


The Alchon were noted for their distinctive coins, minted in Bactria in the 5th and 6th centuries. The name ''Khigi'', inscribed in Bactrian script on one of the coins, and ''Narendra'' on another, have led some scholars {{who|date=October 2017}} to believe that the Hephthalite kings Khingila and Narana were of the AlChoNo tribe.{{vague|date=October 2017}} {{cn|date=October 2017}} They imitated the earlier style of their Hephthalite predecessors, the Kidarite Hun successors to the Kushans. In particular the Alchon style imitates the coins of Kidarite Varhran I (syn. Kushan Varhran IV).{{citation needed|date=April 2012}} The Alchon were noted for their distinctive coins, minted in Bactria in the 5th and 6th centuries. The name ''Khigi'', inscribed in Bactrian script on one of the coins, and ''Narendra'' on another, have led some scholars {{who|date=October 2017}} to believe that the Hephthalite kings Khingila and Narana were of the AlChoNo tribe.{{vague|date=October 2017}} {{citation needed|date=October 2017}} They imitated the earlier style of their Hephthalite predecessors, the Kidarite Hun successors to the Kushans. In particular the Alchon style imitates the coins of Kidarite Varhran I (syn. Kushan Varhran IV).{{citation needed|date=April 2012}}


The earliest coins of the Alchon have several distinctive features: 1) the king’s head is presented in an elongated form to reflect the Alchon practice of head binding; 2) The characteristic bull/lunar tamgha of the Alchon is represented on the obverse of the coins.<ref>Notes on the Evolution of Alchon Coins, Pankaj Tandon, http://coinindia.com/Alchon.pdf</ref> The earliest coins of the Alchon have several distinctive features: 1) the king's head is presented in an elongated form to reflect the Alchon practice of head binding; 2) The characteristic bull/lunar tamgha of the Alchon is represented on the obverse of the coins.<ref>Notes on the Evolution of Alchon Coins, Pankaj Tandon, http://coinindia.com/Alchon.pdf</ref>


===Hephthalites=== ===Hephthalites===
The Hephthalites, or White Huns, were a nomadic tribe who conquered large parts of the eastern middle-east and may have originally been part of the Xionites. The Hephthalites, or White Huns, were a nomadic tribe who conquered large parts of the eastern middle-east and may have originally been part of the Xionites.
{{main|Hephthalites}} {{main|Hephthalites}}
{{sectstub|date=June 2018}} {{expand section|date=June 2018}}


===Nezak=== ===Nezak===
Line 92: Line 90:
Although the power of the Huna in Bactria was shattered in the 560s by a combination of ] and proto-Turkic forces, the last Hephthalite king Narana/Narendra managed to maintain some kind of rule between 570 and 600 AD over the ''nspk'', ''napki'' or ] tribes that remained. Although the power of the Huna in Bactria was shattered in the 560s by a combination of ] and proto-Turkic forces, the last Hephthalite king Narana/Narendra managed to maintain some kind of rule between 570 and 600 AD over the ''nspk'', ''napki'' or ] tribes that remained.


{{sectstub|date=June 2018}} {{expand section|date=June 2018}}


=== Identity of the ''Karmir Xyon'' and ''White Xyon'' === === Identity of the ''Karmir Xyon'' and ''White Xyon'' ===
] argues that the Pahlavi name ''Xyon'' may be read as the Indian '']'' owing to the similarity of sound.<ref name="Iranian Studies 1932" />In the Avestan tradition (Yts. 9.30-31, 19.87) the ''Xiiaona'' were characterized as enemies of ], the patron of ].<ref name="W.Felix" /> ] argues that the Pahlavi name ''Xyon'' may be read as the Indian '']'' owing to the similarity of sound.<ref name="Iranian Studies 1932" /> In the Avestan tradition (Yts. 9.30-31, 19.87) the ''Xiiaona'' were characterized as enemies of ], the patron of ].<ref name="W.Felix" />


In the later Pahlavi tradition, the ''Karmir Xyon'' ("Red Xyon") and ''Spet Xyon'' ("White Xyon") are mentioned.<ref name="W.Felix" /> The Red Xyon of the Pahlavi tradition (7th century)<ref> in ''Encyclopædia Iranica'' by W. Sundermann</ref> have been identified by Bailey as the ''Kermichiones'' or ''Ermechiones''.<ref name="W.Felix" /> In the later Pahlavi tradition, the ''Karmir Xyon'' ("Red Xyon") and ''Spet Xyon'' ("White Xyon") are mentioned.<ref name="W.Felix" /> The Red Xyon of the Pahlavi tradition (7th century)<ref> in ''Encyclopædia Iranica'' by W. Sundermann</ref> have been identified by Bailey as the ''Kermichiones'' or ''Ermechiones''.<ref name="W.Felix" />


According to Bailey, the ''Hara Huna'' of Indian sources are to be identified with the ''Karmir Xyon'' of the Avesta.<ref>(Bailey, 1954, pp.12-16; 1932, p. 945),</ref> Similarly he identifies the ''Sveta Huna'' of Indian sources with the ''Spet Xyon'' of the ''Avesta''. While the ] are not mentioned in Indian sources, they are sometimes also linked to the ''Spet Xyon'' (and therefore possibly to the ''Sveta Huna''). According to Bailey, the ''Hara Huna'' of Indian sources are to be identified with the ''Karmir Xyon'' of the Avesta.<ref>(Bailey, 1954, pp.12-16; 1932, p. 945),</ref> Similarly he identifies the ''Sveta Huna'' of Indian sources with the ''Spet Xyon'' of the ''Avesta''. While the ] are not mentioned in Indian sources, they are sometimes also linked to the ''Spet Xyon'' (and therefore possibly to the ''Sveta Huna'').

Revision as of 17:56, 4 September 2019

Not to be confused with Zionites or Xiongnu. Iranian-speaking nomadic people
Asia in 400 AD, showing the Xionites ("Chionites") and their neighbors.
Part of a series on the
History of Kyrgyzstan
Emblem of Kyrgyzstan
Timeline
Early history
Achaemenid Empire 542–330 BC
Macedonian Empire 329–312 BC
Seleucid Empire 312–189 BC
Greco-Bactrian Kingdom 250–152 BC
Xiongnu 204–53 BC
Han China 101 BC–185 AD
Kushan Empire 30–375
Former Liang 301–376
Rouran Khaganate 330–555
Former Qin 383–386
Later Liang 386–403
Hephthalites 440–560
Medieval history
Kyrgyz Khaganate 539–1207
Turkic Khaganate 557–603
Sasanian Empire 559–628
Western Turkic Khaganate 603–657
Eastern Turkic Khaganate 603–630
Tang China 657–751
Second Turkic Khaganate 682–744
Umayyad Caliphate 706–750
Abbasid Caliphate 750–875
Uyghur Khaganate 791–840
Tibetan Empire 794–842
Kara-Khanid Khanate 840–1089
Seljuk Empire 1089–1141
Qara Khitai 1141–1212
Khwarazmian Empire 1212–1221
Early modern history
Mongol Empire 1218–1266
Chagatai Khanate 1266–1347
Moghulistan 1347–1514
Golden Horde 1368–1446
Timurid Empire 1370–1505
Uzbek Khanate 1437–1471
Kazakh Khanate 1465–1757
Khanate of Bukhara 1501–1709
Yarkent Khanate 1514–1705
Dzungar Khanate 1680–1758
Khanate of Kokand 1709–1876
Qing China 1757–1841
Emirate of Bukhara 1841–1876
Kara-Kyrgyz Khanate 1842–1867
Russian Vassalage
Russian Empire 1876–1917
Urkun 1916–1917
Turkestan Autonomy 1917–1918
Soviet rule
Turkestan ASSR 1918–1924
Kara-Kirghiz Autonomous Oblast 1924–1926
Kyrgyz ASSR 1926–1936
Kyrgyz SSR 1936–1991
Independent Kyrgyzstan
1st Kyrgyz Revolution 2005
2nd Kyrgyz Revolution 2010
3rd Kyrgyz Revolution 2020
Xionites
Chinese
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinYǔn

Xionites, Chionites, or Chionitae (Middle Persian: Xiyōn or Hiyōn; Avestan: Xiiaona; Sogdian xwn; Pahlavi Xyon) are Romanisations of the ethnonym of a nomadic people who were prominent in Transoxania, Bactria and Iran during the 4th and 7th centuries CE.

The Xionites appear to be synonymous with the Huna peoples of classical/medieval India, and possibly also the Huns of European late antiquity. It is unclear whether the Xionites were connected to a people named in Ancient China as the Xunyu (Hünyü 獯鬻; Wade–Giles Hsünyü), Xianyun 猃狁 (Wade–Giles Hsien-yün) and Xiongnu (匈奴 Wade–Giles Hsiung-nu). (While some sources use names such as Hunas, Huns and Xiongnu interchangeably, this remains controversial.)

They were first described by the Roman historian, Ammianus Marcellinus, who was in Bactria during 356-57 CE; he described the Chionitæ as living with the Kushans. Ammianus indicates that the Xionites had previously lived in Transoxiana and, after entering Bactria, became vassals of the Kushans, were influenced culturally by them and had adopted the Bactrian language. They had attacked the Sassanid Empire, but later (led by a chief named Grumbates), served as mercenaries in the Sassanian army.

Within the Xionites, there seem to have been two main subgroups, which were known in the Iranian languages by names such as Karmir Xyon and Spet Xyon. The prefixes karmir ("red") and speta ("white") likely refer to Central Asian traditions in which particular colours symbolised the cardinal points. The Karmir Xyon were known in European sources as the Kermichiones or "Red Huns", and some scholars have identified them with the Kidarites and/or Alchon. The Spet Xyon or "White Huns" appear to have been the known in India by the cognate name Sveta-huna, and are often identified, controversially, with the Hephtalites.

Origins and culture

See also: Origin of the Huns
Hephthalite horseman on British Museum bowl, 460-479 CE.

The original culture of the Xionites and their geographical urheimat are uncertain. They appear to have originally followed animist religious beliefs, which mixed later with varieties of Buddhism and Shaivism. It is difficult to determine their ethnic composition.

Ancient Greek and Roman sources, such as Simocatta, Menander and Priscus, appear to distinguish between the Xionites and the Hephthalites. However, some modern scholars, such as Richard Nelson Frye (1991), believe that the Hepthalites were a prominent subgroup of Xionites.

The theory that the Xionites were a proto-Turkic or para-Turkic people was expressed by Sir Harold Walter Bailey (1932). Bailey wrote that the "Xyon" mentioned in "Pahlavi and Avestan texts... would appear to be... an enemy of the Iranian people in Avestan times, transferred later to the Huns owing to similarity of sound, as Tur was adapted to Turk in Pahlavi". Bailey suggested that "three divisions" of the "Xyon ... seem to be recognized", namely "the Turks, the Karmir (Red) Xyon, and the White Xyon."

Differences between the Xionites, the Huns who invaded Europe in the 4th century, and the Turks were emphasised by Carlile Aylmer Macartney (1944), who suggested that the name "Chyon", originally that of an unrelated people, was "transferred later to the Huns owing to the similarity of sound". The Chyon who appeared in the 4th century, in the steppes on the northeastern frontier of Persia were probably a branch of the Huns that appeared shortly afterwards in Europe. The Huns appear to have attacked and conquered the Alans, then living between the Urals and the Volga about 360 AD, and the first mention of the Chyon was in 356 AD. Macartney also considered that the name Chyon was later "replaced by that of the... Kidarite Huns". (However, he also claimed, erroneously, that "the Kidarites were... identical with the Kushan", when the Kushan Empire had been destroyed by the Xionites and/or Hunas in the mid-4th Century.) Macartney also considered the question of the identity of the Karmir Xyon or Kermichiones, saying that that they could not have been "the true Turks" (the Gokturks, who appear to have entered history on the western steppe, when "their embassy reached Constantinople... in 568". Macartney adds that the Khagan of the Turks at the time was Silzabul, Dizabul or Istämi, but the ruler of the Karmir Xyon was Askílt (Aσκήλτ, often romanised as Scultor). "Neither can they have been the Juan Juan ... nor the Epthalites , who were well known to the Byzantines and would not have been described in this way. Moreover, the Epthalites were known as White Huns, and... Karmir Xyon, meaning Red Chyon, occurs in a Pahlavi text in juxtaposition with Spet Xyon, White Chyon".

At least some Turkic tribes were involved in the formation of the Xionites, despite their later character as an Eastern Iranian people, according to Richard Nelson Frye (1991): "Just as later nomadic empires were confederations of many peoples, we may tentatively propose that the ruling groups of these invaders were, or at least included, Turkic-speaking tribesmen from the east and north, although most probably the bulk of the people in the confederation of Chionites... spoke an Iranian language.... This was the last time in the history of Central Asia that Iranian-speaking nomads played any role; hereafter all nomads would speak Turkic languages".

The proposition that the Xionites probably originated as an Iranian tribe was put forward by Wolfgang Felix in Encyclopedia Iranica (1992).

In 2005, AS Shahbazi suggested that they were originally a Hunnish people who had mixed with Iranian tribes in Transoxiana and Bactria, where they adopted the Kushan-Bactrian language.

The Xionites may have originated as a confederation of Proto-Turkic and/or Proto-Mongolian tribes that collectively adopted Eastern Iranian languages and cultural practices, according to Peter B. Golden (2005).

History

The defeat of the Xiongnu in 89 CE by Chinese forces at the Battle of Ikh Bayan and subsequent Chinese campaigns against them, led by Ban Chao may have been a factor in the ethnogenesis of the Xionites and their migration into Central Asia.

Xionite tribes reportedly organised themselves into four main hordes: "Black" or northern (beyond the Jaxartes), "Blue" or eastern (in Tianshan), "White" or western (possibly the Hephthalites), around Khiva, and the "Red" or southern (Kidarites and/or Alchon), south of the Oxus. Artefacts found from the area they inhabited dating from their period indicate their totem animal seems to have been the (rein)deer. An inscription on the walls of the royal palace in Persepolis about Darius's empire calls them Hunae.

The Xionites are best documented in southern Central Asia from the late 4th century AD until the mid-5th century AD.

Kidarites

See also: Kidarites
Portrait of Kidarites king Kidara, circa 350-386 AD.

Sometime between 194 and 214, according to the Armenian historian Moses of Khorene (5th century), Hunni (probably the Kidarites) captured the city of Balkh (Armenian name: Kush) . According to Armenian sources, Balkh became the capital of the Hunni.

At the end of the 4th century AD, the Kidarites were pushed into Gandhara, after a new wave of invaders from the north, the Alchon, entered Bactria.

Clashes with the Sasanians

Early confrontations between the Sasanian Empire of Shapur II with the Xionites were described by Ammianus Marcellinus: he reports that in 356 CE, Shapur II was taking his winter quarters on his eastern borders, "repelling the hostilities of the bordering tribes" of the Xionites and the Euseni, a name often amended to Cuseni (meaning the Kushans).

Shapur made a treaty of alliance with the Chionites and the Gelani in 358 CE.

Alchon

Main article: Alchon
Artificial cranial deformation is suggested by a portrait of Khingila, king of the Alchon c. 430 - 490 AD.

In 460, Khingila I reportedly united a Hephthalite ruling élite with elements of the Uar and Xionites as Alchon (or Alχon). when.

At the end of the 5th century the Alchon invaded North India where they were known as the Huna. In India the Alchon were not distinguished from their immediate Hephthalite predecessors, and both are known as Sveta-Hunas there. Perhaps complimenting this term, Procopius (527-565) wrote that they were white skinned, had an organized kingship, and that their life was not wild/nomadic and they lived in cities.


The Alchon were noted for their distinctive coins, minted in Bactria in the 5th and 6th centuries. The name Khigi, inscribed in Bactrian script on one of the coins, and Narendra on another, have led some scholars to believe that the Hephthalite kings Khingila and Narana were of the AlChoNo tribe. They imitated the earlier style of their Hephthalite predecessors, the Kidarite Hun successors to the Kushans. In particular the Alchon style imitates the coins of Kidarite Varhran I (syn. Kushan Varhran IV).

The earliest coins of the Alchon have several distinctive features: 1) the king's head is presented in an elongated form to reflect the Alchon practice of head binding; 2) The characteristic bull/lunar tamgha of the Alchon is represented on the obverse of the coins.

Hephthalites

The Hephthalites, or White Huns, were a nomadic tribe who conquered large parts of the eastern middle-east and may have originally been part of the Xionites.

Main article: Hephthalites
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2018)

Nezak

Portrait of a Nezak ruler, circa 460-560 CE.
Main article: Nezak

Although the power of the Huna in Bactria was shattered in the 560s by a combination of Sassanid and proto-Turkic forces, the last Hephthalite king Narana/Narendra managed to maintain some kind of rule between 570 and 600 AD over the nspk, napki or Nezak tribes that remained.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2018)

Identity of the Karmir Xyon and White Xyon

H. W. Bailey argues that the Pahlavi name Xyon may be read as the Indian Huna owing to the similarity of sound. In the Avestan tradition (Yts. 9.30-31, 19.87) the Xiiaona were characterized as enemies of Vishtaspa, the patron of Zoroaster.

In the later Pahlavi tradition, the Karmir Xyon ("Red Xyon") and Spet Xyon ("White Xyon") are mentioned. The Red Xyon of the Pahlavi tradition (7th century) have been identified by Bailey as the Kermichiones or Ermechiones.

According to Bailey, the Hara Huna of Indian sources are to be identified with the Karmir Xyon of the Avesta. Similarly he identifies the Sveta Huna of Indian sources with the Spet Xyon of the Avesta. While the Hephthalite are not mentioned in Indian sources, they are sometimes also linked to the Spet Xyon (and therefore possibly to the Sveta Huna).

More controversially, the names Karmir Xyon and Spet Xyon are often rendered as "Red Huns" and "White Huns", reflecting speculation that the Xyon were linked to Huns recorded simultaneously in Europe.

See also

References

  1. ^ Felix, Wolfgang. "CHIONITES". Encyclopædia Iranica Online Edition. Retrieved 2012-09-03.
  2. Hyun Jin Kim, 2013, The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe, Cambridge UK/New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 5, 36–38.
  3. Original reports on the "Chionitae" by Ammianus Marcellinus:
    Mention with the Euseni/ Cuseni : 16.9.4.
    Mention with the Gelani: 17.5.1.
    Mention with Shapur II: 18.7.21
    Mention at the siege of Amida: 19.2.3 and 19.1.7-19.2.1
  4. ^ Shapur Shahbazi, A. "SASANIAN DYNASTY". Encyclopædia Iranica Online Edition. Retrieved 2012-09-03.
  5. British Museum notice
  6. Richard Nelson Frye; "Emperor Ardeshir and the cycle of history"
  7. ^ Harold Walter Bailey, Iranian Studies, Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London. BSOAS, vol. 6, No. 4 (1932)
  8. Macartney, C. A. (1944). "On the Greek Sources for the History of the Turks in the Sixth Century". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 11 (2). School of Oriental and African Studies: 266–75. ISSN 1474-0699. JSTOR 609313 – via JSTOR.
  9. Richard Nelson Frye, "Pre-Islamic and early Islamic cultures in Central Asia" in "Turko-Persia in historical perspective", edited by Robert L. Canfield, Cambridge University Press, 1991. pg 49.
  10. Peter B. Golden, 2005 "Turks and Iranians: a cultural sketch", in: Lars Johanson and Christiane Bulut (ed.), Turkic-Iranian Contact Areas: Historical and Linguistic Aspects, Turcologica 62, Wiesbaden, p. 19.
  11. CNG Coins
  12. Chinese
  13. Nomads of the Steppe Archived October 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  14. Scheers, Simone; Quaegebeur, Jan (1982). Studia Paulo Naster Oblata: Orientalia antiqua (in French). Peeters Publishers. p. 55. ISBN 9789070192105.
  15. Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History. London: Bohn (1862) XVI-IX
  16. Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman History. London: Bohn (1862) XVII-V
  17. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila, Michael Maas p.286
  18. Notes on the Evolution of Alchon Coins, Pankaj Tandon, http://coinindia.com/Alchon.pdf
  19. "BAHMAN YAŠT" in Encyclopædia Iranica by W. Sundermann
  20. (Bailey, 1954, pp.12-16; 1932, p. 945),

External links

Huns
History
Rulers
Military leaders
Noblemen
Diplomats
Other notable Huns
Culture
Wars
Other Hunnic peoples
Related topics
Categories: