Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pod mod: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:21, 27 September 2019 editRoySmith (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators92,379 edits Failed verification content: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 04:20, 27 September 2019 edit undoQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits Failed verification contentNext edit →
Line 45: Line 45:
The but that does not solve the FV problem. ] (]) 01:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC) The but that does not solve the FV problem. ] (]) 01:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
:The significant part of the re-formatting was including a URL from where you can download the PDF. The discussion of nicotine salts is on pages 95-96. I agree that this source does not state that there are potential health risks. It does talk about how nicotine salts (benzoate or lactate, in various brands) are produced and delivered as an aerosol, but does not specifically talk about the health risk. On the other hand, page does talk about the health effects of benzoic acid, and that juul pods contain more benzoic acid than other brands. :The significant part of the re-formatting was including a URL from where you can download the PDF. The discussion of nicotine salts is on pages 95-96. I agree that this source does not state that there are potential health risks. It does talk about how nicotine salts (benzoate or lactate, in various brands) are produced and delivered as an aerosol, but does not specifically talk about the health risk. On the other hand, page does talk about the health effects of benzoic acid, and that juul pods contain more benzoic acid than other brands.
::This and other content FV. How much longer is the failed verification (and unsourced) content going to remain in the article? See "Pod mods contain a disposable cartridge and are different from e-cigarettes and vapes as the coils are not removed or changed." The source refers to Juul not pod mods in general. See "Many organizations including Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices aim to educate students and teachers about the health-related risks of using pod mods and such products." This also FV. See "Some companies have been required to provide information on how their products of pods will not be marketed towards young people and how they will deter these users from their products." This also FV. ] (]) 04:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


== More than half the article contains unsourced content == == More than half the article contains unsourced content ==

Revision as of 04:20, 27 September 2019

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 25 September 2019 by reviewer RoySmith (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconMedicine Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHealth and fitness Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPharmacology Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Template:Ecig sanctions

Notability?

How are these independently notable from the (vast) array of other vaping devices on the market? Andy Dingley (talk) 23:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

After looking at all the articles, I am finding quite a bit referring to specifically this type of device as separate from e-cigarettes due to the different delivery mechanism of nicotine (and the higher content delivered). There are a ton of blogs in the middle of this but mainstream news sites are reporting on them. Usually the Juul system but there are others mentioned in the articles as well. spryde | talk 20:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Heat-not-burn?

QuackGuru has twice now removed the categorization Category:Heat-not-burn products from this article with no justification other than "wrong" and "Pod mods are not HNT products." I don't know what a "HNT" product is.

Yet pod mods clearly use heating (butane or electric) and are a lower temperature than combustion of tobacco. Products from Ploom, developers of the pod mod, are even noted in the heat-not-burn product article. As a form of e-cigarette technology, it remains unclear why e-cigarette itself is categorized here, but QuackGuru believes that pod mods should not be. Please explain. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Pod mods are different than heat-not-burn products. The heat-not-burn product article does not mention pod mods. Ploom and Pax also make heat-not-burn products. QuackGuru (talk) 15:00, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Thankyou for finally replying.
Why is a pod mod not a heat-not-burn product? What is the difference? They use heat to produce an aerosol. They do not combust the source liquid. Why do you exclude them? Where is your source which says that pod mods are not heat-not-burn products?
Which are the Ploom / Pax products which you are happy to include and which are not? Why are they different? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Where is your reliable source that says "pod mods" are heat-not-burn products? There is a reason pod mods are not mentioned in the heat-not-burn product article. QuackGuru (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
WP:BLUESKY, same as all the other synonyms given for it at Heat-not-burn_product#cite_note-33. The citations there are not stating "Electric cancer stick is a synonym for heat-not-burn product", yet WP is happy to use them, on the basis of shared technical features (the low-temperature heating of nicotine-containing liquids to produce an aerosol), rather than on any linguistic claim. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
This article does not mention heat-not-burn products. A pod mod is not a synonym or a type of heat-not-burn product. I asked for a reliable source that says "pod mods" are heat-not-burn products. QuackGuru (talk) 15:42, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
There are forty synonyms listed at Heat-not-burn_product#cite_note-33. This is no different. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Are you instead limiting "heat-not-burn" to the non-liquid systems alone? i.e. those with dry shredded tobacco in a solid short-use cartridge, rather than the liquid-supplied vaping systems? That would indeed exclude pod mods, but it also excludes half of the synonyms which heat-not-burn is currently listing. What is your basis for that narrowing? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
  • There was no basis for narrowing. It was not about narrowing. No source indicates pod mods are heat-not-burn products. You have refused to provide a source stating that pod mods are heat-not-burn products. QuackGuru (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

"Resembles USB" - Failed Verification

Why the "failed verification" tag when the article clearly states "resemble USB devices". spryde | talk 18:16, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

See "Pod mods come in varying shapes and sizes and some resemble USB devices." See "The palm-sized device resembles a USB flash drive..." That is only about Juul and it does not verify "varying shapes and sizes". "Juul resembles a USB device." would be sourced content. QuackGuru (talk) 18:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Why the tag removed when the first source only verifies content sourced to Juul? QuackGuru (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Pod mods do not produce smoke

They produce aerosol or vapor. QuackGuru (talk) 19:58, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

So you're following the ANI discussion, but refusing to engage with it? Andy Dingley (talk) 20:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
This article says "Pod mods are portable devices that people use to smoke..."
This article also says "As these devices are created with the intent of replicating smoke produced from traditional cigarettes,.." Which is it? They produce smoke or replace smoke? Both sentences are unsourced. That is part of the problem. QuackGuru (talk) 22:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Failed verification content

See "Research reveals potential health risks in aerosolizing nicotine salts and metal toxins that are produced." The 2018 book mentions nicotine salts in passing. It does not verify this claim. QuackGuru (talk) 23:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

The citation was formatted but that does not solve the FV problem. QuackGuru (talk) 01:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

The significant part of the re-formatting was including a URL from where you can download the PDF. The discussion of nicotine salts is on pages 95-96. I agree that this source does not state that there are potential health risks. It does talk about how nicotine salts (benzoate or lactate, in various brands) are produced and delivered as an aerosol, but does not specifically talk about the health risk. On the other hand, this National Center for Health Research page does talk about the health effects of benzoic acid, and that juul pods contain more benzoic acid than other brands.
This and other content FV. How much longer is the failed verification (and unsourced) content going to remain in the article? See "Pod mods contain a disposable cartridge and are different from e-cigarettes and vapes as the coils are not removed or changed." The source refers to Juul not pod mods in general. See "Many organizations including Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices aim to educate students and teachers about the health-related risks of using pod mods and such products." This also FV. See "Some companies have been required to provide information on how their products of pods will not be marketed towards young people and how they will deter these users from their products." This also FV. QuackGuru (talk) 04:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

More than half the article contains unsourced content

Is there a problem with deleting the unsourced content? QuackGuru (talk) 22:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Categories: