| Revision as of 08:15, 8 January 2005 editRangerdude (talk | contribs)3,171 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:59, 8 January 2005 edit undo172 (talk | contribs)24,875 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| (1) You reversions are inappropriate. Each item that you disputed was referenced. Furthermore, you provided no references of your own where you replaced the original text. (2) I did not violate the 3RR. My first edit reverted you when you were editing from an anon IP range. My subsequent edit was to add references to the original text, not a revert but an attempt to address your concerns about unsourced claims. I later reverted that edit after you had deleted sourced scholarship without supporting it. | |||
| BTW, you don't strike me as a new user. Out of curiosity, are you? ] 08:59, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:59, 8 January 2005
(1) You reversions are inappropriate. Each item that you disputed was referenced. Furthermore, you provided no references of your own where you replaced the original text. (2) I did not violate the 3RR. My first edit reverted you when you were editing from an anon IP range. My subsequent edit was to add references to the original text, not a revert but an attempt to address your concerns about unsourced claims. I later reverted that edit after you had deleted sourced scholarship without supporting it.
BTW, you don't strike me as a new user. Out of curiosity, are you? 172 08:59, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)