Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:27, 28 October 2019

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan He should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

Requesting comments from you

Can you please comment on the ongoing discussion in this talk page section. You are an experienced editor who routinely edits that article. Regards, — Vaibhavafro  14:02, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Vaibhavafro, I haven't commented because I don't know much of Genocide Watch. It seems to be a one-man shop. If so, it would be necessary to find coverage in secondary sources. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:48, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: It is a one-man shop. Sounds like propaganda upon reading. And this new editor is not convinced about this, and is engaging in near-edit warring and personal attacks. Unsurprisingly, their editing history is also not clean. Could use your help in combating this. Thanks.— Vaibhavafro  14:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

I know my definition of propaganda may differ from others. But tell me, do you roam around calling Muslims as "terrorists and criminals" in India. Genocide Watch suggests so.— Vaibhavafro  15:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Explanation on reverts

Can you explain the reverts you made on the article I recently edited, have you gone through the changes. And can you please give details of reverts rather than just reverting them and asking the users to explain their changes. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkeshsharma (talk • contribs) 00:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Explanations are generally given in the edit summaries. Did you read them?

In any case, I believe you are making changes to the lead that are WP:UNDUE. You need to propose your changes on the article's talk page and obtain WP:CONSENSUS. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

I didn't saw any explaination on the reverts just some comments for you that I cannot change something on the page. Can you give me a reason why the changes were not better than the previous version? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkeshsharma (talk • contribs) 00:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Image and Reality of the Israel–Palestine Conflict. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Houthi movement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Houthi movement. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Responses to the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Responses to the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Edit war

I saw you again reverted to an old version of the Ramesh Nagaraj Rao article. I think this is incorrect. Check the edit history.

• 11:06, 22 October 2019‎ Winged Blades of Godric reverted to an old version of Ramesh Nagaraj Rao, removing a fair amount of sourced content, during a deletion discussion on this article.
• 12:24, 22 October 2019‎ Aymatth2 reverted this
• 12:31, 22 October 2019‎ Winged Blades of Godric reverted a 2nd time
• 12:36, 22 October 2019‎ Aymatth2 reverted a second time
• 12:37, 22 October 2019‎ Winged Blades of Godric reverted a third time
• 12:37, 22 October 2019‎ Aymatth2 reverted a third time

I believe the correct thing is to restore the article to its state before this edit warring began. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Winged Blades of Godric is an experienced editor and he is certainly not making frivolous edits. Reverting his work is not the right thing to do in this situation. You need to make your case on the article's talk page and attempt to persuade him as well as other page watchers.

If any particular content affects the deletion discussion, you can ask for that version to be preserved until the closure. But, again, you need to explain this on the talk page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

I am an experienced editor and am certainly not making frivolous edits. I added well-sourced and relevant content, which Winged Blades of Godric removed without discussion three times. This was the wrong thing to do, particularly during an AfD, as I told him after reverting his first revert: User talk:Winged Blades of Godric#Reverted edit. I believe the version with the content I added is the one that should be discussed on the AfD, and ask that you restore it. Winged Blades of Godric can then make a case for removing the content on the talk page. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

I had unwatched the AfD in disgust, but notice that Winged Blades of Godric seems to be edit warring with SD0001 there. I have no idea why he feels so strongly about this somewhat obscure (but notable) pundit. It is a mess. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Experienced editors engage on the talk page, identify areas of disagreement, and use dispute resolution mechanisms to resolve them. Since you are not yet doing that, I would not regard you as an experienced editor. So, please follow my advice and make your case on the talk page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:27, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

The discussion is mostly hidden behind hatnotes on the AfD discussion, before and after the edit war, although there was some discussion on the talk page. There was certainly no consensus or attempt to gain consensus by Winged Blades of Godric on removing the content. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

I do not feel passionately about this article, and do not want to waste more time on it. I am mildly irritated by getting a slap on the face. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter – October 2019

Newly recognized content The month of October 2019 started with Gateway of India re-attaining its Good Article status and the Sanjay Dutt filmography was recognized as Featured List.

Newly nominated content List of international goals scored by Sunil Chhetri List of chief ministers of Jharkhand Bengal famine of 1943 India national football team at the Olympics Rakta Sambandham

News

• Article India appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page on October 2, 2019.
• Vijayadashami (pictured) has ended, which celebrates the victory of good over evil.
• There are a lot of high-quality images on Commons uploaded by Itsmalay which can be used on some India cultural monuments articles.
• Parinda is nominated to appear on the main page on November 3.

Miscellaneous

• You can join the discussions opened at Noticeboard for India-related topics.
• You can join the RfC on superlatives sentence at Talk:India.

Events

Events that occoured on October.

• Gandhi Jayanti (2 October)
• Digital Society Day (17 October)
• Martyrs' Day (21 October)
• Accession Day (Jammu and Kashmir) (26 October)
• Thevar Jayanthi (30 October)
• Rashtriya Ekta Diwas (31 October)

• Discuss this newsletter
• Contribute
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe
• Archive

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maryul

Hello! Your submission of Maryul at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:13, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Muhammad Samiuddin Qazi (sami) is using my IP Address

dear Kautilya3, Muhammad Samiuddin Qazi (sami) is using my IP Address. - User:ACCOMPLISHED (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

How is that possible? In any case, please report it to cyphoidbomb. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Yet another sock CU blocked by Bbb23. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fianna Fáil

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fianna Fáil. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Salafi movement

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Muhammad. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 - SummerPhD 23:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0:, this alert for "Muhammad images", which is not what we are dealing with here. Let me check with RegentsPark if there are any discretionary sanctions that apply to Salafi movement. RP, please check out the little storm on this page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)