Misplaced Pages

Boeing Lunar Lander: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:03, 8 November 2019 editFotaun (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,121 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 18:17, 8 November 2019 edit undoRowan Forest (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,651 edits Minor general edits and tweaksNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
] ]
The Boeing Human Landing System (HLS) was submitted to NASA on November 5th as part of the ] Program and ]. The Proposal was advertised as the quickest and simplest method for a 2024 moon landing. The '''Boeing Human Landing System''' ('''HLS''') was submitted to ] on 5 November as part of the ] and ]. The proposal was presented as the quickest and simplest method for a 2024 moon landing.


This is a propsal for the design of a lunar lander and Lunar orbit spacecraft that would use the ] being developed by NASA.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://news.yahoo.com/boeing-proposes-lunar-lander-nasa-022646830.html|title=Boeing proposes lunar lander for NASA crews, rivaling Blue Origin (and SpaceX?)|website=news.yahoo.com|language=en-US|access-date=2019-11-08}}</ref> This was presumably a response to NASA's solicitation in May 2019 from about dozen companies for lunar lander designs.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-taps-11-american-companies-to-advance-human-lunar-landers|title=NASA Taps 11 American Companies to Advance Human Lunar Landers|last=Potter|first=Sean|date=2019-05-16|website=NASA|access-date=2019-11-08}}</ref> This is a propsal for the design of a lunar lander and lunar orbit spacecraft that would use the ] (SLS rocket) being developed by NASA.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://news.yahoo.com/boeing-proposes-lunar-lander-nasa-022646830.html|title=Boeing proposes lunar lander for NASA crews, rivaling Blue Origin (and SpaceX?)|website=news.yahoo.com|language=en-US|access-date=2019-11-08}}</ref> This concept was presented as a response to NASA's solicitation in May 2019 from about dozen companies for lunar lander designs.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-taps-11-american-companies-to-advance-human-lunar-landers|title=NASA Taps 11 American Companies to Advance Human Lunar Landers|last=Potter|first=Sean|date=2019-05-16|website=NASA|access-date=2019-11-08}}</ref>


The lander consists of a descent and ascent stage with the descent stage being able to deorbit the lander which eliminates the need for a third ]. The lander is designed to be launched on an ] rather than assembled in multiple launches, reducing the number of mission critical events from 11 to 5, reducing mission complexity. The lander would also not require the ] and could dock with ] directly in order to allow for a simpler mission profile. The lander would reuse key technologies from ], which would allow systems like life support, the pressure vessel, and avionics system to be flight tested and human rater before being integrated into the lander.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.engadget.com/2019/11/06/boeing-lunar-lander-artemis-proposal/|title=Boeing's lunar lander pitch promises 'fastest path' to the moon|website=Engadget|language=en|access-date=2019-11-06}}</ref> The lander consists of a descent and ascent stage with the descent stage being able to deorbit the lander, which eliminates the need for a third ]. The lander is designed to be launched on an ] rocket rather than assembled in space after multiple launches, reducing the number of mission-critical events from 11 to 5, and reducing mission complexity. The lander would not require to dock onto the ] and could dock with ] directly in order to allow for a simpler mission profile. The lander would reuse key technologies from the ], which would allow systems like ], the pressure vessel, and ] system to be flight-tested and human-rated before being integrated into the lander.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.engadget.com/2019/11/06/boeing-lunar-lander-artemis-proposal/|title=Boeing's lunar lander pitch promises 'fastest path' to the moon|website=Engadget|language=en|access-date=2019-11-06}}</ref>


] was selected to build and test the landers engines and fuel tank structure, ] is also participating in the project. ] was selected to build and test the lander's engines and fuel tank structure. ] is also participating in the project.


== Potential Problems == == Challenges ==
One problem with the lander is that it uses a SLS Block 1B as it's launcher. This variant of SLS is not expected to be operational until 2025 at the earliest with he current plan. Boeing suggests cutting funding for the ] in order to accelerate development of the ] and allow for Block 1B to be flying by 2024. One problem with the lander is its high mass, and it requires to be launched by a SLS Block 1B. This variant of SLS is not expected to be operational until 2025 at the earliest. Boeing suggests cutting funding for the ] in order to accelerate development of the ] and allow for Block 1B to fly in 2024.


==References==
<references />
==See also== ==See also==
*] *]


==References==
{{reflist}}


{{Artemis program}}
{{Moon spacecraft}}
{{US manned space programs}}


] ]

Revision as of 18:17, 8 November 2019

A spacecraft lander for the Moon, Earth's natural satellite

The Boeing Human Landing System (HLS) was submitted to NASA on 5 November as part of the Artemis program and NextSTEP H. The proposal was presented as the quickest and simplest method for a 2024 moon landing.

This is a propsal for the design of a lunar lander and lunar orbit spacecraft that would use the Space Launch System (SLS rocket) being developed by NASA. This concept was presented as a response to NASA's solicitation in May 2019 from about dozen companies for lunar lander designs.

The lander consists of a descent and ascent stage with the descent stage being able to deorbit the lander, which eliminates the need for a third transfer stage. The lander is designed to be launched on an SLS Block 1B rocket rather than assembled in space after multiple launches, reducing the number of mission-critical events from 11 to 5, and reducing mission complexity. The lander would not require to dock onto the Lunar Gateway and could dock with Orion directly in order to allow for a simpler mission profile. The lander would reuse key technologies from the Boeing's CST-100 Starliner, which would allow systems like life support, the pressure vessel, and avionics system to be flight-tested and human-rated before being integrated into the lander.

Intuitive Machines was selected to build and test the lander's engines and fuel tank structure. Aerojet Rocketdyne is also participating in the project.

Challenges

One problem with the lander is its high mass, and it requires to be launched by a SLS Block 1B. This variant of SLS is not expected to be operational until 2025 at the earliest. Boeing suggests cutting funding for the Lunar Gateway in order to accelerate development of the Exploration Upper Stage and allow for Block 1B to fly in 2024.

See also

References

  1. "Boeing proposes lunar lander for NASA crews, rivaling Blue Origin (and SpaceX?)". news.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
  2. Potter, Sean (2019-05-16). "NASA Taps 11 American Companies to Advance Human Lunar Landers". NASA. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
  3. "Boeing's lunar lander pitch promises 'fastest path' to the moon". Engadget. Retrieved 2019-11-06.
Artemis program
Missions
Uncrewed
Crewed
Emblem of the Artemis program
Agencies
Facilities
Rockets
Crewed spacecraft
Robotic spacecraft
Spacecraft missions to the Moon
Exploration
programs
Active
missions
Orbiters
Landers
Rovers
Flybys
Past
missions
Crewed landings
Orbiters
Impactors
Landers
Rovers
Sample return
Failed landings
Flybys
Planned
missions
Artemis
CLPS
Luna-Glob
CLEP
Chandrayaan
Others
Proposed
missions
Robotic
Crewed
Cancelled /
concepts
Related
  • Missions are ordered by launch date. Crewed missions are in italics.
United States human spaceflight programs
Active
Completed
Canceled
Categories: