|
I have an IBAN with another editor IBAN. It recently came to my attention that an account that has been intermittently following me around is ''probably'' a sockpuppet of that editor. If I file a sockpuppet investigation and it turns out that I am wrong (either I can't convince the clerk to endorse CU or CU comes up negative), would I then potentially face repercussions or would it be covered by BANEX? ] (<small>]]</small>) 02:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
:::I'm not going to touch anything in your second or third paragraphs. As for the first -- are we talking about ''mottai'' or ''mottainashi''? No one has ever argued that either word doesn't have a religious sense, and indeed my new favourite source Hasegawa is quite open about the fact that {{tq|''inexpedient or reprehensible towards a god, buddha, noble or the like''}} is the original sense of the word ''mottainashi'', so the claim that you are here to defend the view that ''mottai'' was used in Buddhist texts is ... bizarre. ] (<small>]]</small>) 06:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC) |