Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:22, 12 December 2019

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:Orientls reported by User:Squatch347 (Result: Protected the redirect)

Page: Tabiti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Orientls (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: This is the version user is attempting to maintain.

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Discussion on merge on talk page including Orientls (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

Comments:
There was a on the Talk page to merge the articles, which was done by Krakkos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) after a majority of editors agreed to redirect the article after several attempts to hijack the page by sockpuppets. (Tabiti, Falconfly, Mmcele, Aurornisxui, 5.226.139.140, 85.194.243.243, 85.194.243.243); See: Falconfly Sock Investigation and Tigril34 Sock Investigation. Squatch347 (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

This issue might now be moot. I recommend closing the request now. Squatch347 (talk) 14:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

• Result: Fully protected the redirect, since the talk discussion has closed as Merge. This protection can be undone if a new consensus emerges. As Squatch347 observes above, this page has been troubled by sockpuppetry in the past. EdJohnston (talk) 17:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Matianian reported by User:HistoryofIran (Result: No violation)

Page: Maku, Iran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Matianian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Comments:

User refuses to cooperate / understand WP:RS and has a behaviour that resembles that of a WP:BATTLEGROUND one . --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

• Comment There is not a violation of 3RR here. There is a content dispute between Matianian and HistoryofIran. I am inclined to revert back to the last version that appears widely accepted and protect the page. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

• No violation Since there have been no further reverts, I'm closing this with no action taken. —C.Fred (talk) 20:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

@C.Fred: Could the original revision be restored by any chance? A site named http://www.conflicts.rem33.com is clearly not reliable. --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

@HistoryofIran: I am not immediately convinced that the site is not reliable. You will need to discuss the matter at the article's talk page or WP:RSN. —C.Fred (talk) 00:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Oh boy.. --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:47, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Krimuk2.0 reported by User:KyleJoan (Result: Both warned)

Page: Timothée Chalamet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Krimuk2.0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Krimuk2.0 made bold edits that significantly altered the article's lede section as well as a paragraph in the body. I then altered their edit, attempting to bridge the difference between the old version and Krimuk2.0's version, which you can find here. They then continued to blanket revert even the slightest edit that I made back to their version and later told me to discuss your revertions in the talk page.

I did as they suggested, during which I cited/quoted multiple guideline articles such as MOS:INTRO, WP:UNDUE, and WP:V in support of my edits, to which they replied with more questions regarding my opinions without offering explanations for theirs. They also blatantly asked Why should a "guideline" have to mention something as basic as that, confirming their own failure in adhering to any guideline or policy, and ended the discussion with I'll wait for other editors to weigh in because it's impossible to engage with someone who refuses to see merit in anything that's not their own preference. KyleJoan 10:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Misinterpret me as you may, your version of the lead with the claim that he "gained wider recognition for his supporting roles in the coming-of-age film Lady Bird and the western Hostiles" is still unsourced with no mention of it in the article body. Also, my statement was to invoke WP:COMMONSENSE for basic logic such as not having three reviews from one publication be mentioned in one article. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

. . . your version of the lead with the claim that he "gained wider recognition for his supporting roles in the coming-of-age film Lady Bird and the western Hostiles" . . . I tried to make it better per the agreement we had on the article's talk page with this edit, but you reverted that too. May I also point out that the last edit I made on the article is more similar to how the paragraph looked prior to your bold edits? KyleJoan 10:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Correction: Krimuk2.0 suggested that I read WP:COMMONSENSE, on which I learned that . . . instead of telling someone who disagrees to use common sense, just focus on explaining why ignoring the rules will improve Misplaced Pages in that instance, which I believe Krimuk.20 has not done. KyleJoan 10:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

This: "If there are already two THR reviews in the article, find a different one. There are reliable sources apart from Variety and THR, who publish reviews" is an explanation. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Administrators please note that KyleJoan did not attempt to resolve the dispute. I started the talk page discussion, here. Also, I did not continue edit-warring without consensus, you did. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

And you had consensus? KyleJoan 10:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Who reverted after the discussion began? You did! So who needed consensus? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Per WP:ONUS: The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is upon those seeking to include disputed content. However you want to assess the situation, these edits incited the dispute and therefore are the disputed content. And I only see one revert after the discussion began, and it was not done by me, so let's ask this one more time: who really needed consensus? KyleJoan 12:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

• @KyleJoan and Krimuk2.0: You are both edit-warring. You are both warned to restrict your edits to the Talk page. Any further reverts by either of you may be met with blocks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention regarding the matter, Bbb23. KyleJoan 14:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

User:49.195.103.221 reported by User:Ms Sarah Welch (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page: Criticism of Sikhism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 49.195.103.221 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: (last week, ~ 1 December 2019)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. (04:39, 9 December 2019)
2. (00:59, 10 December 2019)
3. (01:17, 10 December 2019)
4. (02:07, 10 December 2019)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (01:09, 10 December 2019)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Attempts to discuss on the talk page hasn't helped. The IP is merely questioning my motives. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 02:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Bishonen | talk 10:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

User:‎81.111.251.142 reported by User:Iffy (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page: John Nicolson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 81.111.251.142 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Special:Diff/930102165

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Special:Diff/930116074
2. Special:Diff/930104072
3. Special:Diff/930103186
4. Special:Diff/930102598

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/930104286

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: No discussion on talk page

Comments: Clear edit warring from the IP, not 100% sure about the other users involved, but the IP has definitely broke 3RR. Iffy★Chat -- 10:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours 331dot (talk) 11:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

User:98.224.51.125, User:2601:346:67F:9AD0:4CE6:9A51:A999:2A77 & User:2601:346:67F:9AD0:2587:7426:7D82:9AFC reported by User:Alcibiades979 (Result: Semi)

Page

2019 Bolivian political crisis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

98.224.51.125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 2601:346:67F:9AD0:4CE6:9A51:A999:2A77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 2601:346:67F:9AD0:2587:7426:7D82:9AFC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log),

https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/98.224.51.125 https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/2601:346:67F:9AD0:2587:7426:7D82:9AFC https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/2601:346:67F:9AD0:4CE6:9A51:A999:2A77

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

One of the users accounts, that of 98.224.51.125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2019_Bolivian_political_crisis&diff=930149480&oldid=930145974 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2019_Bolivian_political_crisis&diff=930149620&oldid=930149518 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2019_Bolivian_political_crisis&diff=930150292&oldid=930149620 4. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2019_Bolivian_political_crisis&diff=930152095&oldid=930151634 5. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2019_Bolivian_political_crisis&diff=930153671&oldid=930152157 3:5 are 3,000 character chunks

Same user's account but with slightly different IP 2601:346:67F:9AD0:4CE6:9A51:A999:2A77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2019_Bolivian_political_crisis&diff=930081989&oldid=930078220 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2019_Bolivian_political_crisis&diff=930074859&oldid=930063387

1. These two are what he writes originally, they get rolled back by Jamez42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and BeŻet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) at which point on his other IP he begins edit-warring

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. Left message on user page about issue - User talk:98.224.51.125

https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:98.224.51.125

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:2019_Bolivian_political_crisis&diff=930151817&oldid=930145641

Comments:

I'm not particularly good at the wiki code, probably should have learned it. Anyhow, there are three IPs that I'm almost positive are working in conjunction, since all three are out of Jacksonville Florida, and comment exclusively on the same things at the same times. Which is sock puppeting, I think. Has made repeated massive reversions of the 2019 Bolivian political crisis page which amount to vandalism. It's also worth noting to correct the vandalism I myself have broken the 3RR, should this not be considered vandalism on his part, or if someone just tells me I'll happily revert my edits. Alcibiades979 (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

• Result: Semiprotected 2019 Bolivian political crisis for 2 weeks due to an IP-hopping edit warrior. If this editor has valid points to make they should use the talk page and wait till they can convince others. EdJohnston (talk) 16:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

User:ජපස reported by User:slatersteven (Result: Alerts, 1RR on article)

Page: List of reported UFO sightings (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: ජපස (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

The first revert was to old material added long ago (5 years ago removed without discussion), but it is still a revert of another editor. No effort was made to resolve this or justify it on the talk page just this ] and some snotty edit summaries. In fact followed up with this ].Slatersteven (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

• Comment by uninvolved editor: These two are going after each other at Misplaced Pages:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Why not?. Without taking sides, I suggest that an administrator examine the situation and apply sanctions as needed. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Administrator note This is within the pseudoscience DS area, so I have applied 1RR to the article and notified both editors. – bradv🍁 04:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• Result: Closing this report per the DS alerts and the 1RR imposed on the article by User:Bradv. Jps's post "Please let me be as I clean up our UFO articles" is not a sufficient justification for reverting. Consensus is needed for controversial changes. Accusing the other party of WP:CIR when it's actually a disagreement about sourcing is getting close to a block. EdJohnston (talk) 15:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Talu Arain reported by User:Lugnuts (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page: International cricket in 2019–20 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Talu Arain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. diff
2. diff
3. diff
4. diff
5. diff
6. diff

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: link I posted this on their talkpage at 15:55 today, with the last revert, above, happening at 18:20.

Comments: This user keeps changing the location of the upcoming cricket tour between Pakistan and Bangladesh without providing any sources, or communicating on their talkpage. They started this morning, to what I thought was a good-faith edit, which I dropped a polite note on their talkpage. Both myself and Spike 'em have posted on this user's talkpage to offer help, but they've just gone ahead and reverted without explination/sourcing. The rest of their edits have involved adding false information, such as this, suggesting WP:CIR issues. Lugnuts 18:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours – bradv🍁 04:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Dennis Bratland reported by User:Sennen goroshi (Result: Filer blocked)

Page

Dodge Tomahawk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Dennis Bratland (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 00:04, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Sennen goroshi (talk) to last revision by Dennis Bratland (TW)"
2. 23:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Sennen goroshi (talk) to last revision by Dennis Bratland (TW)"
3. 22:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Sennen goroshi (talk) to last revision by Dennis Bratland (TW)"
4. 16:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC) "No reasons rooted in sources cited to justify WP:UNDUE issues. Nobody but ignored editor has supported this; see Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines#Ignoring comments"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 00:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Dodge Tomahawk. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Here is the discussion. Sennen goroshi refused to let anyone properly format the discussion, so the best thing was to simply ignore him, per WP:TALK#Ignoring comments. This was before proceeding to provoke the same battle with an entirely different editor GoodDay, over indenting. Not WP:HERE to build an encyclopedia, only to fight. Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Comments:

Gaming the system because they think Misplaced Pages is their battleground. This guy picked a fight today with the politest, most Canadian editor you’d ever want to meet. Over indenting comments. Indenting. It’s all a game to him, to see who he can get one over on. Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• Note Dennis Bratland did not revert the article after receiving the 3RR warning. INstead, Sennen goroshi left the 3RR warning at 00:09 and filed the AN3 report at 00:15; Dennis made no edits in the interval between those events. —C.Fred (talk) 00:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• Result: Filer blocked 31 hours by User:JzG. EdJohnston (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:120.21.47.167 reported by User:Paleontologist99 (Result: Malformed)

Page

Battle of Saragarhi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

120.21.47.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:118.149.244.216 reported by User:Wallyfromdilbert (Result: Blocked)

Page

Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

118.149.244.216 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 01:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
2. 01:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
3. 01:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
4. 01:38, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
5. 01:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
6. 01:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
7. 01:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
8. 01:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
9. 01:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
10. 00:38, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
11. 00:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
12. 00:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
13. 00:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Development */"
14. 00:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 01:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Repeatedly inserting content that has been reverted by several editors. No edit summaries or response on talk page to messages. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:54, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:2607:F2C0:E74C:67:C58B:EAA7:5979:F072 reported by User:Moxy (Result: Blocked, 31 hours)

Page

O Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

2607:F2C0:E74C:67:C58B:EAA7:5979:F072 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

Plus 3 more since this was filled... 9 reverts thus far with an IP rapid revision warning.

1. 03:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
2. 03:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930235239 by Vaselineeeeeeee (talk)"
3. 03:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930234995 by Moxy (talk)"
4. 03:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930234811 by Moxy (talk)"
5. 03:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930234440 by Vaselineeeeeeee (talk)"
6. 03:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Lyrics */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 03:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

IP just blanking any message sent to them.....not here for the community. Moxy 🍁 03:26, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 31 hours —C.Fred (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Semsûrî reported by User:Neutrale Person (Result: Page move-protected)

Page: Kalhor Kurds (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Semsûrî (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
the user has reverted 4 times my edit by removing two times the sources and info which I had added and by moving the page twice and changing the name of the page. Neutrale Person (talk) 10:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

I guess it's up to the admins' interpretation on whether its two or four reverts. Admins should check the ANI-report by me as well. --Semsurî (talk) 10:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• No violation An editor who edited and moved the page three times is reporting an editor who edited and moved the page twice? That's slightly illogical. User:Neutrale Person, as I said at the admin noticeboard, your change is controversial and therefore you should be discussing it on the talk page (which is currently Talk:Kalhor Kurds), not edit-warring over it. Black Kite (talk) 13:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• Note The page has been protected to temporarily prevent moves, but there is not currently protection in place to prevent editing. —C.Fred (talk) 17:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Sportsplex03 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: Sockpuppet blocked)

Page

Everett Stern (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Sportsplex03 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 17:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
2. 17:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930297269 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) Without due citations, please do not change the Subjects title line. Also, there are multiple sources that lead to investigation on the SJP. Please do not utilize the platform for politically motivated messaging."
3. 14:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930278524 by Primefac (talk)"
4. 14:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930278524 by Primefac (talk) Primefac is being intentionally contentious. This requires moderation from an UNbiased source."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 14:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Notice: Conflict of interest on Everett Stern. (TW)"
2. 17:34, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Everett Stern. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 16:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Tactical Rabbit section */"
2. 17:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Tactical Rabbit section */"

• I'm with NorthBySouthBaranof here. What I have not had the time to look into in detail is the COI matter. Drmies (talk) 17:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
  • And we may have a NOTHERE block waiting to happen here--certainly POV and AGF are serious issues here. Drmies (talk) 17:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
• This can be closed - Bbb23 has blocked them as a sock. Thanks. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:71.190.0.231 reported by User:Ifnord (Result: Blocked 72 hours)

Page

Carter Page (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

71.190.0.231 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 18:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "uh, yeah, no it wasn't... Horowitz is a Democrat and Obama-appointee...a sourced fact. Simply asserting "unnecessary editorial information" does not make it so. PERTINENT FACTS...like his party affiliation is all a sudden "unnecessary" when convenient. Even this Democrat Obama-appointed FBI-protecting HACK admitted wrong things done by the FBI in 2016. Durham and Barr completely disagree with the white-washed elements. Regardless, "I DON'T LIKE" is not a valid WP reason to undo. Restored at 3RR"
2. 18:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "No valid explanation given at all...(against WP rules and drift) undid a contribution that is sourced and factual. No valid reason for revert, of accurate factual sourced information. "I don't like" is not a good reason.... This is a WIKI...so "no own"..... Suppression of valid facts that you don't like or that don't fit your bias or ideology is against Misplaced Pages policy and protocol."
3. 18:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "no reason for revert, of valid factual sourced information. "I don't like" is not a good reason.... This is a WIKI...so "no own"..... No explanation given for accurate addition by other contributor..... restored"
4. 17:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 18:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Old warnings and comments are available in the page history, visible to everyone, even if you blank the page"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Previous 3RR warnings blanked by IP. Ifnord (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

IP blocked 72 hours for personal attacks or harassment. PhilKnight (talk) 20:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:ComedyRulesTheWorld reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: blocked WP:NOTHERE)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Page

Jewish humor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

ComedyRulesTheWorld (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 20:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930336127 by Praxidicae (talk), rv Zionist prpaganda"
2. 20:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930307705 by Praxidicae (talk), get consensus"
3. Consecutive edits made from 10:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC) to 10:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. 10:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Antisemitic Humor */ cleaned up"
   2. 10:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Antisemitic Humor */ h>H"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 20:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Jewish humor. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 20:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "/* "Some Classics" section */"
2. 20:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "/* "Some Classics" section */"

Comments:

Not only are they edit warring but also making blatant personal attacks Praxidicae (talk) 20:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

1. This is about edit-warring and not personal attacks; that is a separate page.
2. I have read the edit-warring policies and I have not breached 3RR. Yes I have edited the page, but I have not made a 4th revert in 24 hours, or if so, it has not been demonstrated and I have not been given the chance to fix it. ComedyRulesTheWorld (talk) 20:20, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

What part of Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. is unclear to you? Praxidicae (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User:The Grand Delusion reported by User:Anthonyg3281 (Result: No violation)

Page

List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

The Grand Delusion (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Comments:

I usually keep track of the Nicktoons schedule and have had no problem making updates on what's airing and what's not. I usually get the information from Zap2It, which is an official TV schedule website. However, The Grand Delusion has been reverting my edits such as upcoming Christmas rerun airings of The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius, Back at the Barnyard, Sanjay and Craig, and Breadwinners in 2 weeks. He says that one-off airings do not count as rerun air dates, so I tried telling him that they are not one-off episodes since they are only rerun air dates and not regular run airings (as I've been keeping track of the last air dates for Nicktoons), but he still won't listen. (Anthonyg3281 (talk) 21:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC))

This report should be thrown out. There is no violation of WP:3RR anywhere here, and I feel that this report is overall in bad faith.
Also, Anthonyng's statement of "they are only rerun air dates and not regular run airings" contradicts his edit here, where he moved the shows in question to "currently broadcast". The Grand Delusion 21:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• No violation There has only been a single revert to the article, so there is no brightline violation of 3RR. There is also no discussion on the talk page: it hasn't been touched for over a year. @Anthonyg3281: You made a bold edit, and it was reverted. I suggest you discuss the matter on the article's talk page and work toward consensus for the change. —C.Fred (talk) 21:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

User: Redditor132 reported by User:Flyer22 Reborn (Result: Stale)

Page: John and Lorena Bobbitt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Redditor132 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Here and here.

Comments:
Editor is obviously adding their personal POV to the lead while describing the addition as solely factual and as "the most neutral possible text." Username says it all. And so does this. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Also take note that this removal by me regarding the "Years after the incident" piece is not part of my dispute with Redditor132. We have both removed that piece. That piece is in the stable version, before Redditor132's edits as this IP and as the Redditor132 account. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

I kindly ask admins to read the original and compare it to my edit, then assess which is more neutral and factual. This person wishes to keep the clearly one-sided inflammatory introduction despite it being inferior simply due to the fact it satisfies his/her point of view about the matter. Misplaced Pages should be the one place people can get facts, not be just another tabloid. Redditor132 (talk) 01:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

You were also reverted by me and by Beauty School Dropout. -Crossroads- (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Redditor132, you didn't receive any traction for the edits you want to make as an an IP, or with an account. I imagine you will have a difficult time finding consensus to make said changes as they are definitely not neutral, despite your claims otherwise. The 3RR report was valid when made though it appears to be Stale now; that being said, if you attempt to make further edits to the lead in this vein without first obtaining consensus on the talk page, I imagine a block will be forthcoming.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 17:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

• Result: I'm marking this report as Stale per User:Ponyo. Though the reported user, Redditor132, would be making a mistake if they try to do this revert again. EdJohnston (talk) 18:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Samp4ngeles reported by The Four Deuces (Result: Blocked)

Page: Tulsi Gabbard (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Samp4ngeles (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: 20:59, 10 December 2019

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 02:31, 12 December 2019 "fixed link on this citation, which is notable given that it contradicted CDC guidance at the time. It also helps add context for anyone researching the SARS issue. It would be of interest given her presidential candidacy. Perhaps also notable given that she and her father took the same stance."
2. 02:49, 12 December 2019 "Sorry, TFD, but if you read the citation that it clearly wasn't the CDC's position -- and if you go to your own source on the talk page (the CDC link), you'll see that it said, "In the United States , where there was limited transmission of SARS-CoV during the 2003 SARS outbreak, neither individual nor population-based quarantine of contacts was recommended." See )"

The text added back was " advocated quarantining travelers to Hawaii who had symptoms of SARS."

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: 22:05, 10 December 2019

Comments:
The article is under 1RR. The editor was previously warned and reported about edit-warring on this article and received a warning from an administrator. I asked the editor to revert but they refused to do so. TFD (talk) 03:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Blocked – 24 hours for violation of the 1RR. The user was asked to self-revert but declined to do so. EdJohnston (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Honest Yusuf Cricket reported by User:Christianster94 (Result: )

Page: Dumbo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Honest Yusuf Cricket (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. (14:46, 11 December 2019)
2. (22:00, 10 December 2019)
3. (21:59, 10 December 2019)
4. (01:20, 9 December 2019)
5. (22:56, 7 December 2019)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
Honest Yusuf Cricket is making a substantial addition to the "Controversy" section in which it states the crows are accused of being stereotypes of African-Americans. He's made useful additions like the name of the leader being changed sometime ago and posting some commentary sources defending the characters. However, he insists on posting an entire text of an essay from a former Disney animator named Floyd Norman who denies the crows are harmful stereotypes. I have attempted to mitigate his edits by posting only the main gist of the essay. However, ever single time, Yusuf Cricket has reverted my and other users' edits and re-posted the entire text the way he wants it.

Basically, his additions, as well-intentioned as they are, make that section particularly read long and cluttered. It also gives more weight to the defending side when I feel violates our neutrality rules. Yusuf Cricket has been told numerous times by other editors on their talk page to stop being non-constructive and I attempted to discuss with him on the article's talk page, but received no response. He's already surpassed the three no-revert rule. Christianster94 (talk) 04:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

@Christianster94: I don't see where they have crossed the three reverts in 24 hours brightline. That said, there needs to be some discussion on the talk page. Thank you for starting one about the crows. Please consider bringing in more voices with a request for comment or for a third option if the discussion stalls. I have advised HYC that if they do not engage in discussion and a consensus emerges, they could be reverted for going against the consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 16:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

@C.Fred: That's only because I didn't revert quickly enough and I also didn't want to become participatory in edit warring. It's been going for almost a week ago and I'm nearly fed with the user. HYC has made no attempt to discuss his changes despite being directed to on his talk page, and I see again HYC has reverted the changes I made last night.

I'll hold out a little while longer, but based on his edit history, HYC wants to keep his changes no matter what. Christianster94 (talk) 17:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

User:108.30.105.141 reported by User:Tarl N. (Result: Declined)

Page

Kingdome (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

108.30.105.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

User being reported

Larry Hockett (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 06:15, 12 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930279865 by Larry Hockett (talk)"
2. 11:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930257248 by Larry Hockett (talk)"
3. 07:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC) ""
4. 06:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930128486 by Larry Hockett (talk) unexplained removal"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 06:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Kingdome. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

This seems to be a general problem for this IP - I assume WP:SPAM, since all the edits to several pages are to point to the same blog. Tarl N. (discuss) 06:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

This is a dispute over whether this link -- -- is valid or not. 108.30.105.141 (talk) 07:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I got carried away. The edits came across to me as blatant spam (especially given the lack of explanation for why this personal web page represented an exception under WP:ELNO #1 and #11). I see now that removing spam is not really an exemption from 3RR. Larry Hockett (Talk) 11:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

@Larry Hockett: On the one hand, it's not enumerated on WP:3RR as an exception to the brightline. On the other hand, the correct place to report obvious spam is WP:AIV, the vandalism noticeboard. In future, report spammers there. —C.Fred (talk) 16:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

This edit seems a might suspicious: welcoming a newly created user account with zero (0) edits. --Calton | Talk 15:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

• Declined
  • In the case of the IP, because it has gone quiet for several hours, and because there's no evidence it's a static IP, I'm not going to block the IP.
  • In the case of Larry Hockett, who was added to the report by the IP, I'm going to err on the side of assuming good faith that he thought reverting blatant spam was a 3RR exception. For future occurrences, the user is advised to report the spam at WP:AIV and not cross the 3RR brightline.

Additonally, I'm watching the Kingdome article and would not hesitate to block the IP for spam if they were to readd the link without gaining consensus at the talk page or if there is further edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring
• Misplaced Pages:Edit warring