| Revision as of 03:24, 22 December 2019 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,975 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:QuackGuru/Archive 5) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:58, 2 January 2020 edit undoColin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,957 edits →Misleading statement: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 22:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC) | Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 22:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| == Misleading statement == | |||
| Your at Doc James talk page, claims that ] is a "list of Doc James's price edits". It very much is not. It is a computer generated list of any edit made by any editor since 2015 who added or removed "price" or "cost" from a line of wikitext in 540 drug articles that I identified as containing price information. It contains an analysis of when editors were in conflict, which is easily identified from the diffs in the list and in no way deliberately singles out one editor. Anyone may review the diffs to judge. I have made a number of claims about conflict wrt drug prices, and claimed that the prices in leads were all inserted by one editor, and such claims require evidence. This is evidence. Please revise your post. Pinging ] as moderating admin and because I am unable to respond to the false claim and any responses on Doc James's page. -- ]°] 12:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:58, 2 January 2020
This user is taking a kit kat-break.
Check sources
www.scoop.it/t/the-future-of-e-cigarette
http://www.economist.com/topics/electronic-cigarettes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/electronic-cigarettes/
Draft:List of diet food creators concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of diet food creators, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
List of drug prices moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of drug prices, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability). Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Misplaced Pages.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it.
When you feel the article meets Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. — Insertcleverphrasehere (click me!) 18:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Heilpraktiker
I wonder if this is of interest to you. Drmies (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- The article is a disaster. You could mention it at the Naturopathy talk page. QuackGuru (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- I commented at the Talk page. -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 16:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- It is related to Naturopathy. The editors at Naturopathy would be interested. You could mention it at the Naturopathy talk page. QuackGuru (talk) 16:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- I commented at the Talk page. -Roxy, the dog. Esq. wooF 16:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beland (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Misleading statement
Your post at Doc James talk page, claims that User:Colin/PriceEdits is a "list of Doc James's price edits". It very much is not. It is a computer generated list of any edit made by any editor since 2015 who added or removed "price" or "cost" from a line of wikitext in 540 drug articles that I identified as containing price information. It contains an analysis of when editors were in conflict, which is easily identified from the diffs in the list and in no way deliberately singles out one editor. Anyone may review the diffs to judge. I have made a number of claims about conflict wrt drug prices, and claimed that the prices in leads were all inserted by one editor, and such claims require evidence. This is evidence. Please revise your post. Pinging Barkeep49 as moderating admin and because I am unable to respond to the false claim and any responses on Doc James's page. -- Colin° 12:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Category: