| Revision as of 20:05, 30 January 2020 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:28, 31 January 2020 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,975 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:QuackGuru/Archive 5) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| http://www.tobacco.org/ | http://www.tobacco.org/ | ||
| ==] concern== | |||
| Hi there, I'm ]. I just wanted to let you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. | |||
| If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. | |||
| You may request ] of the content if it meets requirements. | |||
| If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at ]. | |||
| Thank you for your attention. ] (]) 23:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == ] moved to draftspace == | |||
| An article you recently created, ], does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from ] that are ] that discuss the subject with ] (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability).<sup>(])</sup> Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because ] is necessary for information added to Misplaced Pages. <br/>I've moved your draft to ] (with a prefix of <code>Draft:</code> before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it. <br/>When you feel the article meets Misplaced Pages's ] and thus is ready to be published, you can ] yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the ] template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. — '''''<small>] <sup>(])</sup><small><small><sub>(]</sub></small></small></small>''''' 18:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I wonder if this is of interest to you. ] (]) 15:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :The article is a disaster. You could mention it at the Naturopathy talk page. ] (]) 16:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::I commented at the Talk page. -] ] 16:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :::It is related to Naturopathy. The editors at Naturopathy would be interested. You could mention it at the Naturopathy talk page. ] (]) 16:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | == Nomination of ] for deletion == | ||
Revision as of 03:28, 31 January 2020
This user is taking a kit kat-break.
Check sources
www.scoop.it/t/the-future-of-e-cigarette
http://www.economist.com/topics/electronic-cigarettes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/electronic-cigarettes/
Nomination of Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beland (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Signature color and user page redirect
I didn't want to clutter up the article talk page where I first suggested redirecting your user page to your talk page.
I just realized that you want your user name to be red in signatures. I hadn't bothered to analyze the wikitext until now:
And I learned a trick for combining bolding and color styling: <b style="color: #e34234;">Text</b>
- Text
I will be using that. It is more compact than using span.
You can make it easier for people if you redirect your user page to your talk page. It won't effect the color of your username in signatures since you are using inline styling.
You know, you could make your signature username a color like orange. That would be a bright color, but it wouldn't confuse people by being a red link.
-- Timeshifter (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
List of brands on Nicotine pouch
You reverted my edit on Nicotine pouch in which I deleted the content about the various brands of this product, with the edit summary Including brands are part of the article. See Heat-not-burn product#Products. (If it is an invitation for spam then request semi-protection. I would argue that the inclusion of the individual products in that article is no more appropriate than the inclusion in Nicotine pouch. Since Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information, including an exhaustive brand listing within the body of the article seems inappropriate. At very best, one might consider creating List of nicotine pouch brands, but since the product category is relatively new, it's unlikely any of the brands has yet reached sufficient notability to have its own article, and since most lists should consist only of category entries that already have a Misplaced Pages article (see WP:WTAF), you'd be hard-pressed to create a valid list article. In any case, since you've reverted my edit, I'll open a discussion about the matter at Talk:Nicotine pouch. Please feel free to comment there. WikiDan61ReadMe!! 19:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Violation of RfC
Re: this edit where your edit summary was simply Violation of RfC. Care to explain? WikiDan61ReadMe!! 19:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- I started numerous RfCs last year. Read archive 10 under brands. QuackGuru (talk) 20:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)