Misplaced Pages

User talk:Skyring: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:33, 17 December 2019 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,091 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Skyring/Archive 12) (bot← Previous edit Revision as of 02:28, 16 February 2020 edit undoThe Drover's Wife (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers42,654 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
|archive = User talk:Skyring/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Skyring/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}

==Independent Australia==

Noting - I wonder if it might be time to add Independent Australia to the explicitly banned list. I haven't thought them to be a remotely reliable source for a long time, but after an incident this week with them spreading objectively fake news about Jacqui Lambie (in the same column and by the same author you just removed) I feel like the encyclopedia would be better if it was comprehensively purged. ] (]) 02:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:28, 16 February 2020

Independent Australia

Noting this edit - I wonder if it might be time to add Independent Australia to the explicitly banned list. I haven't thought them to be a remotely reliable source for a long time, but after an incident this week with them spreading objectively fake news about Jacqui Lambie (in the same column and by the same author you just removed) I feel like the encyclopedia would be better if it was comprehensively purged. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)