| Revision as of 21:30, 19 May 2003 editPatrick (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators68,523 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:49, 20 May 2003 edit undoTakuyaMurata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers89,986 edits add list of cities with overpopulationNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| There are some examples from history suggesting that when population pressures become too great, the results may, indeed, include ], ], ] disease, and ] devastation. On the other hand, in many other cases countries with large populations relative to their resources, such as Japan and the Netherlands, have achieved high living standards with limited immediate environmental impact. | There are some examples from history suggesting that when population pressures become too great, the results may, indeed, include ], ], ] disease, and ] devastation. On the other hand, in many other cases countries with large populations relative to their resources, such as Japan and the Netherlands, have achieved high living standards with limited immediate environmental impact. | ||
| '''List of cities with overpopulation''' | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ''see also'' ], ], ] | ''see also'' ], ], ] | ||
Revision as of 03:49, 20 May 2003
Overpopulation came to be seen by many in the Twentieth Century as a critical global issue.
Early in the 19th Century, Thomas Malthus argued that, if left unrestricted, human populations would continue to grow until it would become too large to be supported by the available agricultural land. At that point, the population would be restrained though mass famine and starvation. Malthus argued for population control, through "moral restraint", to avoid this happening.
Over the two hundred years which followed, food production in fact grew faster than population growth and this Malthusian catastrophe did not come to pass. However, it has often been argued that in future, pressures on food production, combined with threats to other aspects of the earth's habitat such as global warming, could make overpopulation a threat in the future. An example of such predictions was the Limits to Growth, a report produced for the Club of Rome in the early 1970s.
Other studies suggest that the current population levels of over six billion may be supported by current resources, or that the population may grow to ten billion and still be within the Earth's capacity to support. However, some argue that these ideas are based on strong assumptions that the systems of our world will continue to function in the ways to which human society is accustomed. In other words, it is argued that such assumptions are not allowing for the full effects of large-scale catastrophes such as global drought or global warming.
It's certainly true that the world's current agricultural production is amply sufficient to feed everyone living on the Earth today, even though economic and political realities of our world mean that this food is unevenly distributed and often does not reach some who are in great need of it.
Many critics hold that, in the absence of other measures, simply feeding the world's population well would only make matters much worse, causing the population to quickly balloon to absolutely unsustainable levels, and resulting in mass famine, disease and other human misery on a scale unimaginable even today.
However, others contend that within a generation after the standard of living and life expectancy starts increasing, family sizes start dropping in what is termed the demographic transition. In support they point to the contention that every estimate of maximum global population since the 1960s, when the "population explosion" became a worry, has been significantly lower than the previous estimates. Among those holding this view are the ecologist Paul Colinvaux, who writes on the topic in Why Big Fierce Animals are Rare, and The Fates of Nations.
Another point of view on population vs. the standard of living is that of Virginia Abernathy in Population Politics, in which she shows evidence that this effect only holds true in nations where women enjoy a relatively high status, and in strongly-patriarchal nations where women enjoy few rights, a higher standard of living tends to result in population growth.
Some approach overpopulation with a "survival-of-the-fittest," "laissez-faire" attitude, arguing that if the Earth's ecosystem becomes overtaxed, it will naturally regulate itself. In this mode of thought, disease or starvation are "natural" means of lessening population. Others argue that economic development is the best way to reduce population growth. Many developed countries in the world today, such as Italy, now have declining populations (especially ignoring the effects of immigration).
In either case, it is often held that the most productive approach is to provide a combination of help targeted towards population control and self-sufficiency. One of the most important measures to be taken in this effort is the empowerment of women educationally, economically, politically, and in the family. The value of this philosophy has been substantially borne out in cases where great strides have been taken to this goal: where women's status has dramatically improved, there has generally been a drastic reduction in the birthrate to more sustainable levels. Other measures include effective family planning programs, local renewable energy systems, sustainable agriculture methods and supplies, reforestation, and measures to protect the local environment.
There are some examples from history suggesting that when population pressures become too great, the results may, indeed, include war, famine, epidemic disease, and environmental devastation. On the other hand, in many other cases countries with large populations relative to their resources, such as Japan and the Netherlands, have achieved high living standards with limited immediate environmental impact.
List of cities with overpopulation
see also Population explosion, Paul Ehrlich, Julian Simon