| Revision as of 10:54, 17 March 2020 edit7&6=thirteen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers152,771 edits k← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:04, 17 March 2020 edit undoPatiodweller (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,048 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Weak keep''': so-called international coverage cited by Lightburst is just a couple of passing mentions and short quotes. WP:ROUTINE applies. However, some of the coverage is more substantiative and I think he just skates by GNG. <span style="background:Black;padding:1px 5px">]]]</span> 10:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC) | *'''Weak keep''': so-called international coverage cited by Lightburst is just a couple of passing mentions and short quotes. WP:ROUTINE applies. However, some of the coverage is more substantiative and I think he just skates by GNG. <span style="background:Black;padding:1px 5px">]]]</span> 10:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' MeetS ]. 10:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' MeetS ]. 10:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - Per the sources, it does appear that he has dealt with a significant number of publicized cases, some of which received worldwide attention, followed by an equally publicized arrest. I'm sure any problems can be dealt with through constructive editing rather than deletion. ] (]) 15:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:04, 17 March 2020
John Trevena (lawyer)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- John Trevena (lawyer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography of an attorney that does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and also fails WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPCRIME and WP:NOTPROMO. This attorney has had some high-profile cases, but coverage of those cases is not in-depth coverage of the attorney. The attorney also had a domestic violence charge, which was dropped, and followed by a lawsuit. That coverage, however, is all local, and doesn't confer notability per BLP1E and BLPCRIME. Trevena, a private attorney, is not a "public figure", despite having some cases that received media attention. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Levivich 16:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is a WP:POINTy nomination. Regarding the article: The subject passes WP:SIGCOV: the article has 21 reliable sources which include both regional and national news organizations. There is also international coverage which is not yet in the article: (BBC) (the Irish Times). News organizations regularly refer to the subject (John Trevena) as a High Profile Attorney. If the AfD participants feel that the subject fails WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPCRIME for his domestic abuse charges which were later dropped, the section can be removed WP:NOTCLEANUP. The attorney will be no less notable without the section. Contrary to the opinion of the nominator the subject is a public figure. High profile lawyers are notable for high profile cases and this lawyer has had many. Lightburst (talk) 20:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- KEEP He doesn't just get mentioned and quoted as being the lawyer in notable cases. They talk about things dealing with him personally. That and being a notable part of cases deemed notable enough already to have their own Misplaced Pages articles, means he is notable enough to have a Misplaced Pages article. Dream Focus 23:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep: so-called international coverage cited by Lightburst is just a couple of passing mentions and short quotes. WP:ROUTINE applies. However, some of the coverage is more substantiative and I think he just skates by GNG. buidhe 10:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep MeetS WP:GNG. 10:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Per the sources, it does appear that he has dealt with a significant number of publicized cases, some of which received worldwide attention, followed by an equally publicized arrest. I'm sure any problems can be dealt with through constructive editing rather than deletion. Patiodweller (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2020 (UTC)