Misplaced Pages

Reincarnation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:38, 20 May 2003 editRotem Dan (talk | contribs)1,671 editsm Added skeptical link← Previous edit Revision as of 16:03, 21 May 2003 edit undoUsedbook (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,860 edits Modifications regarding Buddhist Rebirth and Hindu/Jain ReincarnationNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
]]] ] ]]] ]


The concept of '''reincarnation''', also called ''transmigration of souls'', holds that after physical death, some critical part of a person's personality or spirit is reborn in a different body. This is a central tenet of ], ], some forms of ], and African religions, as well as other ] and philosophies. The concept of '''reincarnation''', also called ''transmigration of souls'', holds that after physical death, some critical part of a person's personality or spirit is reborn in a different body. This is a central tenet of ], ], and African religions, as well as other ] and philosophies.


The concept of '''rebirth''', although often thought as similar to reincarnation, differs drastically and is exclusive to ]. Hindus believe that the ], or ] is what is preserved from one life to the next. Buddhists on the other hand express what they call ], or the non-existence of any unchanging permanent substance. The person is an aggregative whole of psycho-physical components that separate upon death. However, when they separate, they normally cause, if ] energies are still present, a new aggregate to be formed, and thus rebirth is carried out.
Although reincarnation shares certain common features across these belief systems - a continuation of the self usually associated with some ] task - there are often differing descriptions of the actual mechanism by which reincarnation occurs, as well as the details of what aspect of the person is being continued.


Although reincarnation shares certain common features across these belief systems - a continuation of the self usually associated with some ] task - there are often differing descriptions of the actual mechanism by which reincarnation occurs, as well as the details of what aspect of the person is being continued.
For example, reincarnation is a basic tenet of Hinduism and also of Buddhism. Hindus believe that the ], or ] is what is preserved from one life to the next. Buddhists (or at least ] Buddhists) believe in what they call ], or the non-existence of the soul. The person is nothing more than an aggregate of material and mental components that separate upon death. However, when they separate, they normally cause a new aggregate to be formed, and thus reincarnation is carried out. Many Buddhists use the term ''rebirth'' rather than reincarnation, because they claim that reincarnation implies that there must be a separate soul incarnate in a physical body.


Reincarnation has a history in western culture as well. Some ancient Greek philosophers believed in reincarnation; see for example ]'s ''Phaedo'' and ''The Republic''. ] was probably the first Greek philosopher to advance the idea. Reincarnation has a history in western culture as well. Some ancient Greek philosophers believed in reincarnation; see for example ]'s ''Phaedo'' and ''The Republic''. ] was probably the first Greek philosopher to advance the idea.
Line 13: Line 13:
===Cycle of death and rebirth=== ===Cycle of death and rebirth===


In ], liberation from ], the cycle of death and rebirth, is considered the ultimate goal of earthly existance. This is known as ] in Hinduism and Jainism, and as ] in Buddhism. In ], liberation from ], the cycle of death and rebirth, is considered the ultimate goal of earthly existance. This is known as ] in Hinduism and Jainism, and as ] in Buddhism.


The Gnostics also believed that the material body was evil, and that they would be better off if they could eventually avoid having their 'good' souls reincarnated in 'evil' bodies. The ] also believed that the material body was evil, and that they would be better off if they could eventually avoid having their 'good' souls reincarnated in 'evil' bodies.


Similarily, ] holds that the people of earth have been brainwashed into believing that they cannot exist without a physical body, and that the resulting fear of death and compulsive need to reincarnate immediately after death are responsible of much of their misery. Similarily, ] holds that the people of earth have been brainwashed into believing that they cannot exist without a physical body, and that the resulting fear of death and compulsive need to reincarnate immediately after death are responsible of much of their misery.
Line 29: Line 29:
==Evidence of reincarnation== ==Evidence of reincarnation==


Although anecdotal evidence abounds, the ''scientific'' evidence for reincarnation is currently fairly weak. The most detailed collections of personal reports in favor of reincarnation have been published by Dr. ] in works such as ''Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects'' Although anecdotal evidence abounds, the ''scientific'' evidence for reincarnation is currently fairly weak. The most detailed collections of personal reports in favor of reincarnation have been published by Dr. ] in works such as ''Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects'', which documents thousands of detailed cases where claims of injuries received in past lives sometimes correlate with atyptical physical birthmarks or birth defects. Perhaps the most significant anecdotal evidence in this regard is the phenomenon of young children spontaneously sharing what appear to be memories of past lives, a phenomenon which has been reported even in cultures that do not hold to a belief in reincarnation. Upon investigating these claims, Stevenson and others have identified individuals who had died a few years before the child was born who seem to meet the descriptions the children provided. In the most compelling cases, autopsy photographs reveal that the deceased individuals have fatal injuries that correspond to the unusual marks or birth defects of the child; for example, marks on the chest and back of a child line up precisely with the bullet entry and exit wounds on the body of an individual who has been shot. However, Stevenson cautions that such evidence is ''suggestive'' of reincarnation, but that more research must be conducted.
, which documents thousands of detailed cases where claims of injuries received in past lives sometimes correlate with atyptical physical birthmarks or birth defects. Perhaps the most significant anecdotal evidence in this regard is the phenomenon of young children spontaneously sharing what appear to be memories of past lives, a phenomenon which has been reported even in cultures that do not hold to a belief in reincarnation. Upon investigating these claims, Stevenson and others have identified individuals who had died a few years before the child was born who seem to meet the descriptions the children provided. In the most compelling cases, autopsy photographs reveal that the deceased individuals have fatal injuries that correspond to the unusual marks or birth defects of the child; for example, marks on the chest and back of a child line up precisely with the bullet entry and exit wounds on the body of an individual who has been shot. However, Stevenson cautions that such evidence is ''suggestive'' of reincarnation, but that more research must be conducted.


Skeptics such as ] have analyzed many of these and other anecdotal accounts, and claim that further research into the individuals involved provides sufficient background to weaken the conclusion that these cases are credible examples of reincarnation. Skeptics such as ] have analyzed many of these and other anecdotal accounts, and claim that further research into the individuals involved provides sufficient background to weaken the conclusion that these cases are credible examples of reincarnation.

Revision as of 16:03, 21 May 2003


The concept of reincarnation, also called transmigration of souls, holds that after physical death, some critical part of a person's personality or spirit is reborn in a different body. This is a central tenet of Hinduism, Jainism, and African religions, as well as other religions and philosophies.

The concept of rebirth, although often thought as similar to reincarnation, differs drastically and is exclusive to Buddhism. Hindus believe that the soul, or atman is what is preserved from one life to the next. Buddhists on the other hand express what they call anatta, or the non-existence of any unchanging permanent substance. The person is an aggregative whole of psycho-physical components that separate upon death. However, when they separate, they normally cause, if kammic energies are still present, a new aggregate to be formed, and thus rebirth is carried out.

Although reincarnation shares certain common features across these belief systems - a continuation of the self usually associated with some karmic task - there are often differing descriptions of the actual mechanism by which reincarnation occurs, as well as the details of what aspect of the person is being continued.

Reincarnation has a history in western culture as well. Some ancient Greek philosophers believed in reincarnation; see for example Plato's Phaedo and The Republic. Pythagoras was probably the first Greek philosopher to advance the idea. Many Gnostic groups believed in reincarnation. Toward the Light is an example of a contemporary work originating in the western world, which very detailed accounts for reincarnation.

Cycle of death and rebirth

In vedic religions, liberation from samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth, is considered the ultimate goal of earthly existance. This is known as Moksha in Hinduism and Jainism, and as Nirvana in Buddhism.

The Gnostics also believed that the material body was evil, and that they would be better off if they could eventually avoid having their 'good' souls reincarnated in 'evil' bodies.

Similarily, Scientology holds that the people of earth have been brainwashed into believing that they cannot exist without a physical body, and that the resulting fear of death and compulsive need to reincarnate immediately after death are responsible of much of their misery.

Reincarnation in the Modern World

Aside from the religions mentioned above, there are other groups who believe in reincarnation as well. In Christianity for instance, the great majority of Christian groups deny reincarnartion, but some sects, such as the Liberal Catholic Church, include the concept of reincarnation in their doctrine. Some Hasidic Jews also include this doctrine.

Today belief in reincarnation is widespread in New Age and Neopagan circles. It is an important tenet of Theosophy, and central to Spiritism, founded by Allan Kardec.

The Church of Scientology's Sea Org has been known to issue employment contracts with a duration of one million years and a clause specifically stipulating that the contractual obligations continue after death.

Evidence of reincarnation

Although anecdotal evidence abounds, the scientific evidence for reincarnation is currently fairly weak. The most detailed collections of personal reports in favor of reincarnation have been published by Dr. Ian Stevenson in works such as Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects, which documents thousands of detailed cases where claims of injuries received in past lives sometimes correlate with atyptical physical birthmarks or birth defects. Perhaps the most significant anecdotal evidence in this regard is the phenomenon of young children spontaneously sharing what appear to be memories of past lives, a phenomenon which has been reported even in cultures that do not hold to a belief in reincarnation. Upon investigating these claims, Stevenson and others have identified individuals who had died a few years before the child was born who seem to meet the descriptions the children provided. In the most compelling cases, autopsy photographs reveal that the deceased individuals have fatal injuries that correspond to the unusual marks or birth defects of the child; for example, marks on the chest and back of a child line up precisely with the bullet entry and exit wounds on the body of an individual who has been shot. However, Stevenson cautions that such evidence is suggestive of reincarnation, but that more research must be conducted.

Skeptics such as Paul Edwards have analyzed many of these and other anecdotal accounts, and claim that further research into the individuals involved provides sufficient background to weaken the conclusion that these cases are credible examples of reincarnation.

Critics who claim that reincarnation is impossible often espouse the alternate theory that a large number of mental phenomena such as memory and ability are already accounted for by physiological processes; and may point to moral and practical inconsistencies in the various theories of reincarnation. To the materialistic mind, Occam's Razor would then seem to dictate that the critical view is to be preferred, as it demands no extraordinary new evidence beyond what is already known to science.

A more skeptical view is that without solid evidence showing that reincarnation exists (regardless of the current state of science), the theory of reincarnation cannot be considered to be a valid scientific theory regarding the real world. Some skeptics explain the abundance of claims of evidence for reincarnation to originate from selective thinking and the psychological phenomena of false memories that often result from one's own belief system and basic fears, and thus cannot be accounted as empirical evidence.

See also: Karma, Metempsychosis

References

  • Ian Stevenson, Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and Birth Defects ISBN 0275952835
  • Paul Edwards, Reincarnation: A Critical Examination ISBN 1573929212

External Links