Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/13th GMA Dove Awards: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:19, 1 April 2020 editAdamant1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,342 edits Added comment← Previous edit Revision as of 20:41, 1 April 2020 edit undoWalter Görlitz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers294,571 edits WP:INDENT and RNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)</small>
* '''Keep''' The notability of the ceremony here is not related to the use references. ] (]) 17:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC) * '''Keep''' The notability of the ceremony here is not related to the use references. ] (]) 17:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
* '''Comment''' {{Ping|Walter Görlitz}}, What's the notability related to then? There isn't currently any solid guidelines about the notability of ceremonies or awards from my understanding. So it goes to the ] guidelines. Which requires the use of references. Otherwise, any ceremony or award would be notable by default, no matter how mundane it might be. I'm not even saying the ceremony itself isn't notability anyway, I'm just saying this particular article about it isn't. Those are two different things. If there's going to be a spin off article of a subject it has to be justified. An essentially blank page isn't. Misplaced Pages isn't a directory. --] (]) 19:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC) ** '''Comment''' {{Ping|Walter Görlitz}}, What's the notability related to then? There isn't currently any solid guidelines about the notability of ceremonies or awards from my understanding. So it goes to the ] guidelines. Which requires the use of references. Otherwise, any ceremony or award would be notable by default, no matter how mundane it might be. I'm not even saying the ceremony itself isn't notability anyway, I'm just saying this particular article about it isn't. Those are two different things. If there's going to be a spin off article of a subject it has to be justified. An essentially blank page isn't. Misplaced Pages isn't a directory. --] (]) 19:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
*** So the BEFORE you did, was that through print publications from 1982, because that's where you're going to find the publicity for this particular event. All detailed at ]. It's disingenuous of you to suggest anything else was thorough. I'm expecting a thorough review of '']'' back-issues, '']'', '']'' and other publications that would have covered this. I suspect you did a simple Google search. As for what's the notability, it was in the press at the time but I don't have access to the sources. The awards that were distributed that night are are detailed at and , the latter is not a RS though, but suspect it could be used for the nominations alone. ] (]) 20:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:41, 1 April 2020

13th GMA Dove Awards

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

13th GMA Dove Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable awards ceremony. It's had a sourcing banner on it since 2010 that never got dealt with and a WP:BEFORE search fails to come up with anything. Maybe it could be merged into GMA Dove Award, but there isn't anything to merge. Since the article is essentially devoid of content. Adamant1 (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 14:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 14:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep The notability of the ceremony here is not related to the use references. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
    • Comment @Walter Görlitz:, What's the notability related to then? There isn't currently any solid guidelines about the notability of ceremonies or awards from my understanding. So it goes to the WP:GNG guidelines. Which requires the use of references. Otherwise, any ceremony or award would be notable by default, no matter how mundane it might be. I'm not even saying the ceremony itself isn't notability anyway, I'm just saying this particular article about it isn't. Those are two different things. If there's going to be a spin off article of a subject it has to be justified. An essentially blank page isn't. Misplaced Pages isn't a directory. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
      • So the BEFORE you did, was that through print publications from 1982, because that's where you're going to find the publicity for this particular event. All detailed at Misplaced Pages:Notability (events). It's disingenuous of you to suggest anything else was thorough. I'm expecting a thorough review of CCM Magazine back-issues, Campus Life, Cornerstone and other publications that would have covered this. I suspect you did a simple Google search. As for what's the notability, it was in the press at the time but I don't have access to the sources. The awards that were distributed that night are are detailed at the Dove Awards past winners page and this page, the latter is not a RS though, but suspect it could be used for the nominations alone. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Categories: