| Revision as of 13:00, 18 December 2006 editModernist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers106,205 edits →Paul Durand Ruel← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:30, 18 December 2006 edit undoCBDunkerson (talk | contribs)Administrators15,422 edits Husnock arbitration caseNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| Thank you for your note on my discussion page. I cited the origin of the material in the sources and footnotes left in the "Life" section on that page. I found that material there several months ago - I left a note on one of my edits saying this page needs help. Also I wrote an original section "Impressionism", this morning and as I said - I cited the origin of the bio material - that was already there. Deleting all of the material including what I wrote today seems like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. ] 17:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | Thank you for your note on my discussion page. I cited the origin of the material in the sources and footnotes left in the "Life" section on that page. I found that material there several months ago - I left a note on one of my edits saying this page needs help. Also I wrote an original section "Impressionism", this morning and as I said - I cited the origin of the bio material - that was already there. Deleting all of the material including what I wrote today seems like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. ] 17:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Thank you again. I will restore a little of the more original and less controversial material later today. Hopefully and eventually the page will fill in correctly. ] 12:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | :Thank you again. I will restore a little of the more original and less controversial material later today. Hopefully and eventually the page will fill in correctly. ] 12:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Husnock arbitration case == | |||
| An arbitration case has been opened ] to attempt to resolve the dispute(s) surrounding recent actions by Husnock, yourself, and others. --] 16:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:30, 18 December 2006
Archived talk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14 15. 16. Current talk: User_talk:Morwen
WP:VPT#fun and profit with templates
I replied to your question at the tech pump, and I'm curious if it addresses your issue. Been playing with templates more and more lately and this one seemed like an interesting problem. --*Spark* 12:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I posted a potential solution to the VPT thread. The msgnw prefix allows you to include a template text without processing. If you put a citation in a template, you can include it regularly and with msgnw within a table. Gimmetrow 06:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Your template
I had a little at fixing your template.. I think it would work if we had StringFunctions installed here but we don't :-( thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 12:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- I also had a few shots at sorting this out (now deleted, at User:Warofdreams/metacite - but it seems to be a lost cause. I managed to pass one parameter and print the result, but any more and the problem of passing pipes to Template:cite book caused it to foul up. Warofdreams talk 01:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Wigan and so on...
I hoped that I'd have sorted this out, but alas no :-(. See Higher End, Billinge Hospital and so on for more circular editing. What is noticeable is that the edits all come in fairly rapid succession. Whilst I am trying to keep them encyclopedic, I am kind of risking WP:3RR here and don't want to get banned for helping out. Do you have any thoughts? Regan123 01:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
help request: infobox television
Hi . I am having a doozy of a time entering theme music composer to the television infobox. I tried to add it on the syntax section of template:infobox television and my edit did not result in the addition of theme music composer. Any tips? Thanks. Dogru144 14:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Paul Durand Ruel
Thank you for your note on my discussion page. I cited the origin of the material in the sources and footnotes left in the "Life" section on that page. I found that material there several months ago - I left a note on one of my edits saying this page needs help. Also I wrote an original section "Impressionism", this morning and as I said - I cited the origin of the bio material - that was already there. Deleting all of the material including what I wrote today seems like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Modernist 17:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you again. I will restore a little of the more original and less controversial material later today. Hopefully and eventually the page will fill in correctly. Modernist 12:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Husnock arbitration case
An arbitration case has been opened here to attempt to resolve the dispute(s) surrounding recent actions by Husnock, yourself, and others. --CBD 16:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)