User talk:Riverbend: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:18, 7 December 2006 editOldMediationBot (talk \| contribs)1,120 edits Mediation notification← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:53, 22 December 2006 edit undoElonka (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits ArbComNext edit →
Line 50:		Line 50:
	\|}		\|}
	<div align="right">''This message delivered: 04:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)''.</div>		<div align="right">''This message delivered: 04:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)''.</div>

			==ArbCom proceeding==
			Hiya, hope your holidays are going well. :) If you would like to watch the ArbCom proceedings, you may wish to set ] on your watchlist. Your own name is mentioned a few places at the ], and possibly at the ]. The case is currently in an "evidence-gathering" phase and has not yet reached the state of actual comment by arbitrators yet. My guess is it'll probably run for another month or so before a decision is finalized.

			No action is needed on your part, but if you would like to participate in the case, you are more than welcome. You may wish to offer a statement with your view of events at the case's talkpage, or you can add evidence or participate in the workshop. Best, ]]] 06:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:53, 22 December 2006

"I'm sorry, I was using the subjunctive instead of the past tense. We're a way past tents, now; we're all living in bungalows."

Groucho Marx

Radical AdZ

Featured article candidate review: Buffy article

You maybe interested to know that the article 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer' has recently been nominated as a candidate to become a featured article. Should it become a featured article, it will be possible for the article to appear on the Misplaced Pages main page on March 10th 2007, the 10th anniversary of Buffy (the premiere, "Welcome to the Hellmouth" aired March 10th 1997).

Any feedback you can offer to improve the article and/or to either object or support the nomination, would be wonderful. Thanks -- Paxomen 18:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Reply

FYI, I went ahead and answered on my own talkpage, to try and keep everything together. :) --Elonka 01:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Mediation request

This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.

Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/OpenNote is deprecated. Please see User:MediationBot/Opened message instead.

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Example. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you,

—Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

Yup, I saw. I think you're doing a great job in there, keep up the good work. :) I'll participate as I can, though I'm a bit busy with day-job things. Unfortunately I feel that this puts me at a disadvantage with the many editors who seem to have nothing else to do but monitor Misplaced Pages, but, I'll do what I can. :) --Elonka 23:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

In Universe, Lost

Thank you very much for your comment on "In Universe" on the "Lost WikiProject". I very much like being a member of the Project, and my fellow contributors are great people. However, sometimes advice can be vague and your comment was a real breath of fresh air. Thank you my friend. codu (/) 23:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Well keep up the good words brother. You're doing an excellent job! You take a good neutral view and I respect that. codu (/) 00:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Replied

Hi. When I get comments on my page I'm never sure whether to reply there or on the commenter's page. This time I replied on mine. It's an etiquette minefield, I swear...--Nalvage 22:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Moral support

You have mine. :) BTW, do you have any preferred off-wiki communication methods? --Elonka 22:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll email you my email address :) Riverbend 23:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Riverbend, thank you for your nice note and for all your help with the discussion! --Toby Rush ‹ ✆|✍ › 21:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television).

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 04:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC).

ArbCom proceeding

Hiya, hope your holidays are going well. :) If you would like to watch the ArbCom proceedings, you may wish to set Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions on your watchlist. Your own name is mentioned a few places at the evidence page, and possibly at the workshop page. The case is currently in an "evidence-gathering" phase and has not yet reached the state of actual comment by arbitrators yet. My guess is it'll probably run for another month or so before a decision is finalized.

No action is needed on your part, but if you would like to participate in the case, you are more than welcome. You may wish to offer a statement with your view of events at the case's talkpage, or you can add evidence or participate in the workshop. Best, El on ka 06:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)