| Revision as of 22:32, 21 December 2006 editMichaelas10 (talk | contribs)11,793 editsm →[]: +Delete and salt← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:18, 22 December 2006 edit undoBrownlee (talk | contribs)1,513 edits →[]: KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - fails ] since I can't find any coverage by reliable sources, awards won or anything else notable. ] 19:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - fails ] since I can't find any coverage by reliable sources, awards won or anything else notable. ] 19:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete and salt'''. I believe that the previous AfD was completely unfair, and people were !voting keep because of the matter of the subject itself, while completely ignoring ]. This isn't notable, period. '''<span style="background:#000">] ]</span>''' 22:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete and salt'''. I believe that the previous AfD was completely unfair, and people were !voting keep because of the matter of the subject itself, while completely ignoring ]. This isn't notable, period. '''<span style="background:#000">] ]</span>''' 22:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Firstly, ] is not policy. It is inadmissible to delete something because of guidelines. What policy does it fail to meet? Secondly, this is not a vote; it is a debate. The closing admin looked at the debate and decided not to delete, so the stuff about "a bunch of ]-based votes" is irrelevant.--] 13:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:18, 22 December 2006
Wipipedia
- Previous AFD: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wipipedia
del, nonnotabke wiki. Since its first momination the article failed to addresss the concerns of notability and verifiability. `'mikkanarxi 19:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Reading the first debate, I'm leaning towards delete. The concerns were not addressed. Some had an WP:ILIKEIT stance, some wanted to keep the article because "WP:WEB is not policy, so it has no relevance". You'll have to do better than that. Also, whether the "specialist wikis" thrive is not really our business. Punkmorten 19:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence from WP:RS that this site meets WP:WEB. Yes, it's not policy, but there's a reason it's around, and it's not to be contravened by a bunch of WP:ILIKEIT-based votes. --Kinu /c 19:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:WEB since I can't find any coverage by reliable sources, awards won or anything else notable. Jayden54 19:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. I believe that the previous AfD was completely unfair, and people were !voting keep because of the matter of the subject itself, while completely ignoring WP:WEB. This isn't notable, period. Michaelas10 (Talk) 22:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Firstly, WP:Web is not policy. It is inadmissible to delete something because of guidelines. What policy does it fail to meet? Secondly, this is not a vote; it is a debate. The closing admin looked at the debate and decided not to delete, so the stuff about "a bunch of WP:ILIKEIT-based votes" is irrelevant.--Brownlee 13:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)