Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:08, 23 December 2006

Ann Coulter oddity; Fano

1) I didn't lock the page. I unlocked it.
2) I reverted your edit because someone asked me to. You'll have to discuss it on the talk page.
3) I am not interested in Mel Gibson or Ann Coulter in any way. As I said, I reverted it on request.
4) That image thing has nothing to do with me, so I don't know why you went off on a rant about that.
5) Don't move your user/talk pages again.

-- Steel 17:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Parapsychology

Hi,

I think that parapsychology is too controversial a field to depend on dictionary definitions. Also, its status as a hard science has increased a lot recently, which means dictionaries haven't caught up. As with all scientific fields, it does have a lot of dilettantes, but just as you can call biology a science even though a lot of people take unneeded vitamins, you can call parapsychology a science even though a lot of people who study it are witless. Anyway, the Parapsychological Association is an affiliate of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Martinphi 00:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

You ask why Tart can't do it all with psi powers. Well, why can't we get to the moon with magnets? There are magnetic rocks on the moon. Why use rockets? Because magnetism is too weak, or doesn't work that way. Very strong some ways, but under other conditions (distance), very weak. Have you read Dean Radin's books? They might explain a little more how weak effects don't always have experiments that work every time. They might also help convince you that there actually are repeatable experiments which work, with the caveat that we are detecting a very weak effect. I think you were right about not having "science" in the definition, because I think other sciences wouldn't be defined that way- they'd just be defined as "the study of." Martinphi 20:21, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

times arrow

perhaps I removed it in error, but I was taught that (SIC) means this is how it is to be read, its not a typo sort of thing... like a direct quote where mistakes were made but not by the one quoting it.Jiohdi 14:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

link

The site seems a bit slow right now, however the site eventually loads for me and is normally much quicker. You may just need to refresh your page. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 02:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Style tips

Hi. I have a few small notes. It is good if one makes variables italic when doing math formatting, so x or ${\displaystyle x}$ instead of plain x. Also, There is no need to put underscores in links, so

]

works just as well as

]

These are tiny things, but I thought I'd let you know. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Tight end

Nothing mysterious about it: just vandalism by an anonymous IP address. See the the following diff link: . I have reverted the edit, but you could have done that yourself. That's what Misplaced Pages is: the encyclopedia that anyone can edit! Anyway, happy editing! —Lowellian (reply) 05:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Parapsychology as taboo

See Parapsychology talk page Martinphi 00:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Seamus Heaney

hi, with regard to the pronunciation, I've always understood it to be SHAY-mus HEE-ny. I have never heard him saying it, but I would be surprised to find it was pronounced any other way. Hope this helps. Rbreen 09:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Style

Yes, I know it doesn't do much for style. And I wouldn't do it with a less controversial subject. But I'm trying not to fall afoul of . As far as being pro-paranormal, I doubt that has made much of a difference. These are some of the major skeptical objections, and some of the major parapsychological answers. If I didn't present them fairly, they should be edited. And I expect more objections will be contributed. Someone already did one, the last under General Criticism. I thought it was Plato who wrote those dialogues? In Socrates name? Of course I'd do a more readable job if I weren't more concerned with ease of use and POV.