| Revision as of 20:23, 3 June 2020 editDreamy Jazz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators105,825 edits →Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine closed: Replying to QuackGuru (using reply-link)← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:32, 4 June 2020 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,272 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:QuackGuru/Archive 5) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| http://www.tobacco.org/ | http://www.tobacco.org/ | ||
| == ] opened == | |||
| You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at ]. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at ]. '''Please add your evidence by April 21, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, ]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ] 🎷 <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 20:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| *I've modified your current block to allow you to participate in this case, but please do not edit outside the case and case talk pages. –]] 00:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==] concern== | |||
| Hi there, I'm ]. I just wanted to let you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. | |||
| If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. | |||
| You may request ] of the content if it meets requirements. | |||
| If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at ]. | |||
| Thank you for your attention. ] (]) 01:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration proposed decision posted == | == Arbitration proposed decision posted == | ||
Revision as of 03:32, 4 June 2020
This user is taking a kit kat-break.
Check sources
www.scoop.it/t/the-future-of-e-cigarette
http://www.economist.com/topics/electronic-cigarettes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/electronic-cigarettes/
Arbitration proposed decision posted
The proposed decision in the Medicine arbitration case has been posted, and contains one or more remedies or findings of fact which relate to you. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of drug prices
Hello, QuackGuru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of drug prices".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages! JMHamo (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine closed
An arbitration case Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles. Any uninvolved administrator may apply sanctions as an arbitration enforcement action to users editing in this topic area, after an initial warning.
- CFCF is reminded to avoid casting aspersions and similar conduct in the future.
- Doc James is prohibited from making any edits relating to pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing in the article namespace.
- QuackGuru is indefinitely topic-banned from articles relating to medicine, broadly construed.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 15:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine closed
The evidence does not match the remedy. User:Bluerasberry pointed out there is an evidence-remedy mismatch. See Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine/Proposed_decision#Comments_by_bluerasberry. No editor or admin responded to the concerns. Dreamy Jazz, were you aware of the evidence-remedy mismatch concerns? QuackGuru (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- QuackGuru, I had noted the existence of and skim read the section. I have not made any judgements on the reasoning. I would say that there have been three days since that concern was posted so I would presume that at least a couple of Arbitrators saw their concerns. Also seeing as another editor had added this too, Arbitrators probably have already seen this concern at some point through the proposed decision process. Dreamy Jazz 20:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Suggestion
In dealing with your deletion request on User talk:QuackGuru/Ziki 10 a couple of times today I see that you took the content from User:QuackGuru/Ziki 10 and recreated it at User:QuackGuru/Ziki in the few minutes between the final remedies being enacted on Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine and Dreamy Jazz posting the notification on your talk page a few minutes later.
I'd urge you strongly to request deletion of your subpages which could be construed as breaching your TBAN or containing material which would be in breach. Relying on html comment marks as your defence isn't likely to be taken as good faith. Cabayi (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Category: