| Revision as of 20:08, 19 December 2006 edit68.5.96.201 (talk) ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:28, 23 December 2006 edit undoCoelacan (talk | contribs)14,831 edits edit warring on Ghazal Omid, accusing me of wikistalking, and getting close to 3RRNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Re:] == | |||
| I have reverted your edit again. See ] for my rationale, and please discuss any further changes there before implementing them. -] 03:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Ghazal Omid, again == | |||
| I am not Wikistalking you. I just monitor new additions to ]. If the additions are not obviously appropriate, I remove them. Many of the additions should simply be in ]. If your only edits are to add inappropriate pages to ], then I suppose it would have the appearance of Wikistalking when I revert all those edits. But that's neither my fault nor my problem. Regarding Ghazal Omid, especially, whose article you have taken particular interest in, ] asked you months ago to take your issues to the talk page. I asked you to do the same in my edit summary, . You're welcome to take it up on the talk page, but I will continue removing the category until you provide sufficient rationale for its inclusion, ''as opposed to simply being in ] alone.'' | |||
| In addition, you are approaching 3RR , so here is fair warning: | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Ghazal Omid|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> — ] ] — 14:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:28, 23 December 2006
Re:Ghazal Omid
I have reverted your edit again. See the article's talk page for my rationale, and please discuss any further changes there before implementing them. -Elmer Clark 03:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Ghazal Omid, again
I am not Wikistalking you. I just monitor new additions to Category:Anti-Islam sentiment. If the additions are not obviously appropriate, I remove them. Many of the additions should simply be in Category:Critics of Islam. If your only edits are to add inappropriate pages to Category:Anti-Islam sentiment, then I suppose it would have the appearance of Wikistalking when I revert all those edits. But that's neither my fault nor my problem. Regarding Ghazal Omid, especially, whose article you have taken particular interest in, User:Elmer Clark asked you months ago to take your issues to the talk page. I asked you to do the same in my edit summary, here. You're welcome to take it up on the talk page, but I will continue removing the category until you provide sufficient rationale for its inclusion, as opposed to simply being in Category:Critics of Islam alone.
In addition, you are approaching 3RR , so here is fair warning:
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Ghazal Omid. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. — coelacan talk — 14:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)