Revision as of 01:27, 14 June 2020 editCinedish (talk | contribs)3 edits →A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove messageTag: WikiLove← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:25, 14 June 2020 edit undoPratheeba Rani (talk | contribs)332 edits →harrasment;blocking: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Wonderful work, keep it ;) ] (]) 01:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Wonderful work, keep it ;) ] (]) 01:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
|} | |} | ||
== harrasment;blocking == | |||
{{WP:HA#NOT}} | |||
{{WP:HOUND}} | |||
{{WP:HOUNDING}} | |||
{{WP:WIKIHOUND}} | |||
{{WP:WIKIHOUNDING}} | |||
{{WP:FOLLOWING}} | |||
i blocked you due to | |||
*persistent personal attacks | |||
*actions placing users in danger | |||
*hounding | |||
*harassment | |||
*threatening | |||
*apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor | |||
*disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason |
Revision as of 13:25, 14 June 2020
Archives |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
E-mails
You can use "Email this user" in the panel on the left, but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.
Broadcasted
The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Misplaced Pages:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B
Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Misplaced Pages tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".
A July 2019 search for Broadcast gave over 200,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 74.
Of these 74, 15 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 16 refer to a Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are quotations.
Just a clarification!!
He is also Indian And Also Canadian So will Indo-Canadian work. I don't think it does. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 07:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi XxPixel WarriorxX - as can be seen from the page history, and in the talk archive there has been considerable edit warring/discussion about this.
Personally I think the best suggestion was made by another editor, now in the talk archives, "India-born Canadian actor"? He was granted Canadian citizenship. And since India doesn't allow dual citizenship, even if he is residing in India, he isn't Indian by law.
So, legally, the one thing he isn't is Indian, which is what multiple edits on that page have been to add. - Arjayay (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
@Arjayay:Why don't you become an admin. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 07:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- You are not the first to suggest that. Currently, I have health issues (not Corvid 19), but provided I am well, I may do so in the autumn. - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
@Arjayay:May you get well, And Best of luck to become an admin!! XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 06:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
@Arjayay:You are an Indian aren't you XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 17:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
@Arjayay:Draft this page as it has a minimal amount of references and data so please draft it
XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Updated with AndhraPradesh Capital details
HI Arjay,
Amaravati is captital of andhra pradhesh. I have not updated any thing wrong over here. hyderbad is just history. we can not tell Hyderbad as capital for AP any more.
your old brother has asked you to stay in his house for 10 years. that does not means you have to stay there for 10 years. you will move out of your brother house as soon as your own house is ready. it does not make sense to use hyderbad as capital. We should not give wrong impression to external world that Hyderabad is captial of AP. What ever it is Amaravati is capital of AP. What ever govt has plans, let us update once plan come to implementation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manforap (talk • contribs) 12:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
@Arjayay:After some researching found he's correct. So you may remove that May 2020 from his talk page XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 14:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
@Manforap:His edit was also correct you were not supposed to remove it altogether cause you are new and it was unsourced. XxPixel WarriorxX (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Amusingly, several editors arguing about this added / failed to correct Amravati, which is in Maharashtra, not Amaravati - Arjayay (talk) 10:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Found discrepancy
Hi,
Please check infobox of the page Kalaripayattu there is a redirected page Aromal Chekavar included. In my knowledge both the pages Aromal Chekavar and Thacholi Othenan were redirected to Vadakkan Pattukal because of continuous disruptive edits, non-reliable sourcing and unwanted caste claims happened on both pages. Please look into this matter and request you to remove the redirected page Aromal Chekavar also from the infobox to make the article look unbiased for readers. Outlander07 15:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi User:Outlander07 - please note I am not an admin - so you are as capable of making these changes as I am - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 10:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Pratheeba Rani (talk) 12:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC) hi, i am in gudiyatham . it is my hometown.you are continuously threatening me.i am not well versed in wikipedia edditing.so kindly apoligise me and kindly help me to develop my hometown and add citations in it Pratheeba Rani (talk) 12:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC) thankyou - Arjayay (talk)
Gnoming around
I got you, this manic correction of misspellings led you to correct what should not have been corrected: past of broadcast can also be broadcasted, you are suffocating my artistic expression and right of free speech :D https://www.usingenglish.com/reference/irregular-verbs/ Fthobe (talk) 22:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Fthobe, please read the section "Broadcasted" at the top of this page - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 08:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Du erhältst einen Orden!
Der Höflichkeitsorden | |
For relentlessly fixing my tipos :) Fthobe (talk) 19:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC) |
Please look into the disruptive edit
Hi,
Please have a look on the page Nangeli a guy is into some kind of edit war, repeatedly changing sourced contents. Thank You Outlander 15:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Outlander07 - I've warned the IP, and explained why he was being reverted, which you could/should have done yourself.
I've also issued a 3RR warning, so if the edit is repeated, you can report the IP at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring - please do not just keep reverting the IP or you, too, could run foul of WP:3RR - being "right" is not an excuse - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice, will keep it in mind. Thank You Outlander 16:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Where to see move discussion sir
Where to see move discussion sir
Bengaluru to Bangalore page Mallikarjunasj (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Mallikarjunasj - as I clearly said at Talk:Bangalore, they are listed "in the box at the top of this page" - so look in the box at the top of Talk:Bangalore - Arjayay (talk) 12:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Removal of Indic scripts
The reasoning for the avoidance of Indic scripts in the MOS seems archaic and is a decicion made close to a decade ago. It seems regressive and unnecessary, please let me know why this is still being followed and how the guidelines can be updated. Debitpixie (talk) 09:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Debitpixie
Language-warring was a major problem in India-related Misplaced Pages articles - this has significantly reduced since WP:NOINDICSCRIPT, which has evolved over a long period of time.
Previous attempts to amend/overturn it have been highly unsuccessful and I cannot imagine anything has changed. You are welcome to try and change it, but until you succeed, deliberately breaking this consensus, as you did at Indian Space Research Organisation, with a declared intent to EDITWAR, is clear vandalism - Arjayay (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Fair enough, I will refrain from undoing any more edits, how do I go about changing it though? I am not aware of the processes required to do so. Debitpixie (talk) 15:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you
Now I was thinking that I was mis gramer and you carrect my grammar. Thank you Shahina269 (talk) 16:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Secession of China Article revert
Secession of China Article revert | |
So Aryajay what was your objection to me updating status of Hong Kong when Chinese Communist party backed police are beating protesters on streets of Hong Kong city? Did you get threats from CCP agents in your country or just on their payroll yourself buddy? Sags1991 (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC) |
New official name for cities in Tamil Nadu, India
Hello, The State government of Tamil Nadu has issued orders changing names of over 1000 places in that state. You can see about that here. Unsurprisingly, Move pages without seeking consensus has already begun. It includes major cities like Coimbatore, Triplicane, Vellore, Dharmapuri etc. What can be done to tackle this? Can we get a move protection on these pages? Thanks--Ab207 (talk) 18:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ab207 - I wish I could help, but Misplaced Pages will not protect things in case they are vandalized/altered against WP:COMMONNAME, it will only protect things that are being vandalized/altered against WP:COMMONNAME. That said, changing the name of 1018 places all at once is unprecedented even by Indian standards, and checking each one of them is going to be a nightmare. Let me think about this - Arjayay (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- I see. I'll bring to your notice if there is any any active vandalism going on.--Ab207 (talk) 19:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ab207 - I hope you don't mind, but I've copied your post, and my initial reply, to Misplaced Pages talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics where it will be seen by more editors involved in Indian topics. I suggest any further comments/ideas you may have are made there. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds good. No issue.--Ab207 (talk) 19:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ab207 - I hope you don't mind, but I've copied your post, and my initial reply, to Misplaced Pages talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics where it will be seen by more editors involved in Indian topics. I suggest any further comments/ideas you may have are made there. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 19:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- I see. I'll bring to your notice if there is any any active vandalism going on.--Ab207 (talk) 19:35, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
warning;vandalism
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Gudiyatham, you may be blocked from editing.Pratheeba Rani (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Pratheeba Rani stop trolling - I have made 10 edits to that page, mostly to revert your unsourced additions - as the page statistics show, I have added 164 bytes to the page since 20/06/2018 (nearly 2 years) whereas you have added 30,544 bytes since 17/05/20 (nearly one month) -Arjayay (talk) 07:51, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Junaidi Mercedes (W114/W115)
Junaidi Mercedes Bemberut You.
Hmmm! Bau Cou-Cou La....!
Te ketiak car.
Junaidi Mercedes buy and drives this car, with his smelly armpit. 2001:D08:1282:8C07:1:0:402F:6C22 (talk) 06:32, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Does this mean anything? - Arjayay (talk) 09:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
stop your A jealous character and start developing gudiyatham with me
respected sir, --Pratheeba Rani (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC) i born in gudiyatham .it is my hometown and my native place.we are not a new one . we came here before 500 years to gudiyatham .you are living at east angilia which is in east england.how can you know about this place????instead of your search in internet.is it your native place???no,of course.you should teach me how to add content in wikipedia.but you are threatening me.instead of promoting me and adding content you are deleting and degrade me..shame on you
according to rule "Ignore all rules" (IAR) is a policy in the English Misplaced Pages. It reads: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Misplaced Pages, ignore it." (emphasis in original). The rule was proposed by Misplaced Pages co-founder Larry Sanger to encourage editors to add information without focusing excessively on formatting.
so i request you to develop me and not to get jealous on me. yes you are very jealous as the page statistics show, I have added 164 bytes to the page since 20/06/2018 (nearly 2 years) whereas you have added 30,544 bytes since 17/05/20 (nearly one month) as these lines show
thankyou, --Pratheeba Rani (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Pratheeba Rani Please stop trolling, by issuing false templates - I will ignore your trolling and try and answer your post above.
I'm afraid that it is not clear what you are trying to say - why would I be jealous of you?.
I have not "threatened" you, as repeatedly stated above, I am not an admin, so I can't block you
I have, however, advised you when you break the rules and guidelines, and when you ignore that advice, I have issued stronger advice.
Please understand:-- Misplaced Pages is not interested in who you are, where you are from, what you "know", or what you have found out.
Equally, Misplaced Pages is not interested in who I am, where I am from, nor even what I don't "know",
Misplaced Pages is only interested in what has already been published in reliable sources, which need to be cited in order to support information added to our pages.
You have been adding statements without any references, so they are being removed, and will continue to be removed.
- Misplaced Pages is not interested in who you are, where you are from, what you "know", or what you have found out.
- For information on how to add citations, please see Help:Referencing for beginners, and please only cite reliable sources, not blogs, or sources without a reputation for being independent and for fact checking
Furthermore, please stop uploading copyright images, taken from the internet, as these will be detected and deleted sooner or later - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Wonderful work, keep it ;) Cinedish (talk) 01:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC) |
harrasment;blocking
English Misplaced Pages conduct policy "WP:HA" redirects here. For Misplaced Pages's historical archive, see Misplaced Pages:Historical archive. For humor on Misplaced Pages, see Misplaced Pages:Humor.This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus. | Shortcuts |
This page in a nutshell: Do not stop other editors from enjoying Misplaced Pages by making threats, repeated annoying and unwanted contacts, repeated personal attacks, intimidation, or posting personal information. |
If you are a user who is being harassed, see § Dealing with harassment. |
Conduct policies |
---|
Harassment is a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually, the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine, frighten, or discourage them from editing.
Misplaced Pages must never be misused to harass anyone, whether or not the subject of the harassment is an editor here. Edits constituting harassment will be reverted, deleted, or suppressed, as appropriate, and editors who engage in harassment are subject to blocking and banning.
Harassment can include actions calculated to be noticed by the target and clearly suggestive of targeting them, even when no direct communication takes place.
Types of harassment and disruption
See also: Misplaced Pages:Civility § Identifying incivility, and Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks
Harassment, including threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Misplaced Pages and thus cause disruption to the project. Harassment of an editor on the basis of race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religious or political beliefs, disability, ethnicity, nationality, etc. is not allowed.
The prohibition against harassment applies equally to all Wikipedians. It is as unacceptable to harass a user with a history of inept or disruptive behavior as it is to harass any other user. Misplaced Pages encourages a civil community: people make mistakes, but they are encouraged to learn from them and change their ways. Harassment is contrary to this spirit and damaging to the work of building an encyclopedia.
Hounding
ShortcutsHounding on Misplaced Pages (or "wikihounding") is the singling out of one or more editors, joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Misplaced Pages.
Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam. The contribution logs can be used in the dispute resolution process to gather evidence to be presented in incidents and arbitration cases. Using dispute resolution can itself constitute hounding if it involves persistently making frivolous or meritless complaints about another editor.
The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason. Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions.
Threats
Threatening another person is considered harassment. This includes any real-world threats, such as threats of harm, and threats to disrupt a person's work on Misplaced Pages. Statements of intent to properly use normal Misplaced Pages processes, such as dispute resolution, are not threats. Legal threats are a special case of threat, with their own settled policy. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely.
Perceived legal threats
Main page: Misplaced Pages:No legal threats ShortcutMisplaced Pages has a policy of blocking users who post legal threats on Misplaced Pages against other editors. It is important not to post comments that others may reasonably interpret as a legal threat; words such as libelous or defamatory are best avoided for that reason. In handling apparent legal threats, users should seek to clarify the poster's intention, explain the policy, and ask them to remove the threat. That users are involved in a legal dispute with each other is not a reason to block, so long as no legal threats are posted on Misplaced Pages.
Posting of personal information
Shortcuts "WP:PRIVACY" redirects here. For the Wikimedia privacy policy, see Wikimedia:Privacy policy. See also: Doxing, Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing, and Arbitration Committee response to the Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outingPosting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person has voluntarily posted their own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. Personal information includes an editor's real-life name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, personal profiles on external sites, other contact information, or photograph, whether such information is accurate or not. Posting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of privacy and may place that editor at risk of harm outside their activities on Misplaced Pages. Unless unintentional and non-malicious (for example, where Wikipedians know each other off-site and may inadvertently post personal information, such as using the other person's real name in discussions), attempted outing is sufficient grounds for an immediate block. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors.
How to deal with personal information
If you have accidentally posted anything that might lead to you being outed (including but not limited to inadvertently editing while logged out, which reveals your IP address, and thus, your approximate location), it is important that you act promptly to have the edit(s) oversighted. Do not otherwise draw attention to the information. Referring to still-existing, self-disclosed posted information is not considered outing, and so the failure of an editor to have the information redacted in a timely manner may remove it from protection by this policy. Further information about protecting private information is at Personal security practices, On privacy, and How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages.
Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for oversight to delete that edit from Misplaced Pages. Any administrator may redact it pending oversight, even when the administrator is involved. If an editor has previously posted their own personal information but later redacted it, it should not be repeated on Misplaced Pages, although references to still-existing, self-disclosed information are not considered outing. If the previously posted information has been removed by oversight, then repeating it on Misplaced Pages is considered outing.
If you see an editor post personal information about another person, do not confirm or deny the accuracy of the information. Doing so would give the person posting the information, and anyone else who saw the page, feedback on the accuracy of the material. For the same reason, do not treat incorrect attempts at outing any differently from correct attempts. When reporting an attempted outing take care not to comment on the accuracy of the information. Outing should usually be described as "an attempted outing" or similar, to make it clear that the information may or may not be true, and it should be made clear to the users blocked for outing that the block log and notice does not confirm the information.
The fact that an editor has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse to post the results of "opposition research". Dredging up their off-site opinions to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be. Threats to out an editor will be treated as a personal attack and are prohibited.
Exceptions
Nothing in this policy prohibits the emailing of personal information about editors to individual administrators, functionaries, or arbitrators, or to the Wikimedia Foundation, when doing so is necessary to report violations of confidentiality-sensitive policies (such as conflict of interest or paid editing, harassment, or violations of the child-protection policy). Only the minimum information necessary should be conveyed and the minimum number of people contacted. Editors are warned, however, that the community has rejected the idea that editors should "investigate" each other. Posting such information on Misplaced Pages violates this policy.
Posting links to other accounts on other websites is allowable in specific situations (but see also Misplaced Pages:Linking to external harassment):
- There are job posting sites where employers publicly post advertisements to recruit paid Misplaced Pages editors. Linking to such an ad in a forum such as the Conflict of interest noticeboard is not a violation of this policy.
- If individuals have identified themselves without redacting or having it oversighted, such information can be used for discussions of conflict of interest (COI) in appropriate forums.
- If redacted or oversighted personally identifying material is important to the COI discussion, then it should be emailed privately to an administrator or arbitrator—but not repeated on Misplaced Pages: it will be sufficient to say that the editor in question has a COI and the information has been emailed to the appropriate administrative authority.
- To combat impersonation (an editor claiming falsely to be a particular person), it is permissible to post or link to disavowals from that person, provided that the person has explicitly and in good faith given their consent, and provided that there is a high degree of confidence in the authenticity of the source.
Issues involving private personal information (of anyone) could also be referred by email to a member of the functionaries team. While in the limited circumstances outlined above, links to external websites containing solicitations to edit Misplaced Pages may be posted on Misplaced Pages to demonstrate that there may be conflict of interest editing, links to personal profiles on external sites should not be connected to any specific Misplaced Pages editor unless that editor discloses it themselves.
Private correspondence
Shortcuts See also: Misplaced Pages:Private correspondenceThere is no community consensus regarding the posting of private off-wiki correspondence.
The Arbitration Committee has stated a principle that "In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki" and in a second principle that "Any uninvolved administrator may remove private correspondence that has been posted without the consent of any of the creators. Such material should instead be sent directly to the Committee."
User space harassment
Shortcut See also: Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed commentsA common problem is harassment in userspace. Examples include placing numerous false or questionable "warnings" on a user's talk page, restoring such comments after a user has removed them, placing "suspected sockpuppet" and similar tags on the user page of active contributors, and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space.
User pages are provided so that editors can provide some general information about themselves and user talk pages are to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues. Any sort of content which truly needs to be displayed, or removed, should be immediately brought to the attention of admins rather than edit warring to enforce your views on the content of someone else's user space.
Off-wiki harassment
Shortcut See also: Linking to external harassment and Misplaced Pages is not compulsoryInappropriate or unwanted public or private communication, following, or any form of hounding, when directed at another editor, violates the harassment policy. Off-wiki harassment, including through the use of external links, will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases. In some cases, evidence should be submitted by private email. As is the case with on-wiki harassment, off-wiki harassment can be grounds for blocking, and in extreme cases, banning.
Editors who welcome private communication typically post their preferred contact information on Misplaced Pages, sometimes enabling email through the Misplaced Pages interface. Contacting an editor using any other contact information, without first obtaining explicit permission, should be assumed to be uninvited and, depending on the context, may be harassment. Never contact another editor in this way as part of a dispute, or when the editor has asked not to be contacted that way. Unexpected contact using personal information as described above in Posting of personal information may be perceived as a threat to the safety and well-being of the person being contacted. Users who experience inappropriate off-wiki contact should report occurrences privately to the Arbitration Committee or to the emergency response team.
Harassing those outside of the editing community
ShortcutIn alignment with the protection of editors from harassment described throughout the rest of this policy, edits that harass living or recently deceased people who are not members of the Misplaced Pages community are also prohibited. Per the oversight policy, harassing content will be deleted or suppressed. Editors who post such material in any namespace may be indefinitely blocked.
Content and sourcing that comply with the biographies of living persons policy do not violate this policy; neither do discussions about sources and authors of sources, unless comments about persons are gratuitous to determining source quality. See also WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLPCOI, and the associated discretionary sanctions.
Dealing with harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:How to deal with harassment ShortcutIf you feel you are being harassed, first and foremost, act calmly (even if difficult). It is hard to overemphasize this.
If the harassment includes threats of physical harm to you or others, follow the procedures on dealing with threats of harm.
In serious cases or where privacy and off-wiki aspects are an issue (e.g., where private personal information is a part of the issue, or on-wiki issues spread to email and 'real world' harassment, or similar), you can contact the Arbitration Committee. To have personal information removed from page histories contact the oversight team.
For simpler, on-wiki matters, such as a user with whom you have arguments, see dispute resolution as the usual first step. It makes it easier to identify the problem you are having if there are some specific diffs. For more serious cases where you are willing to address it on-wiki, you may request administrative assistance. (Do not open a discussion about outing on behalf of a third party without the victim's permission, unless the relevant page revisions have already been oversighted. It is important not to make violations of privacy more severe.)
Note: If other editors have concerns over your editing, then you will quite likely gain attention from administrators and other concerned users as a result. Any civil and appropriate comments addressed by them to you would not be considered harassment.
Accusing others of harassment
ShortcutMaking accusations of harassment can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a personal attack if harassment is alleged without clear evidence that the others' action is actually harassment, and unfounded accusations may constitute harassment themselves if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of harassment on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle. At the same time, claims of harassment should be taken seriously and not be summarily dismissed unless it becomes clear the accusations are not well-founded.
Assistance for administrators being harassed
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Admins willing to make difficult blocksMisplaced Pages administrators' actions can bring them into direct conflict with difficult users and at times they too are harassed. Typically this happens when an administrator decides to intervene in a dispute with a view to warning or blocking disruptive parties or preventing their continual troublesome behavior.
Administrators are volunteer editors like any other user. They are not obligated any more than any other user to take any specific action beyond expected good conduct and responsiveness, and they are not required or expected to place themselves in an uncomfortable situation, to undertake actions which will diminish their enjoyment of working on Misplaced Pages or place themselves at risk in any way. Administrators who feel that they may have such a situation are advised to seek advice, discuss privately with other administrators, or pass the matter to another administrator willing to make difficult blocks.
Administrators who are confident they are safe from harassment, or willing to address difficult users and their potential actions, may wish to list themselves on the above page, and add the userbox template {{User difficultblocks}} to their user page, which also adds the user to Category:Misplaced Pages administrators willing to make difficult blocks
This administrator can and will make difficult blocks if needed. |
- Or use: ]
In case of problems, administrators have exactly the same right as any other user to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to contact the Arbitration Committee if needed.
Reactions to harassment
Some people may find it hard to remain calm and to react constructively in the face of real or perceived harassment. It is important that any allegations of misconduct about someone who is being harassed be considered in this context. Suffering real or perceived harassment does not justify an editor's misconduct, but a more cautious approach to sanctions in such situations is preferred.
Consequences of harassment
Although editors are encouraged to ignore or respond politely to isolated incidents, that should not imply that they are acceptable or without consequences. A pattern of hostility reduces the likelihood of the community assuming good faith, and can be considered disruptive editing. Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by harassment and/or personal attacks are likely to become involved in the dispute resolution process, and may face serious consequences such as blocks, arbitration, or being subjected to a community ban. Harassment negatively affects editor retention.
Blocking for harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks § Consequences of personal attacks- In extreme cases, such as legal threats, threats of violence, or outing, protective blocks may be employed without prior warnings.
- Incidents of wikihounding generally receive a warning. If wikihounding persists after a warning, escalating blocks are often used, beginning with 24 hours.
What harassment is not
Shortcut
This policy is aimed to protect victims of genuine harassment which is meant to cause distress to the user, such as repeated and unwanted correspondence or postings. Like the word stalk, harass carries real-life connotations – from simple unseemly behavior to criminal conduct – and must be used judiciously and with respect to these connotations.
However, some editors seem to give "harassment" a much broader, and inappropriate, meaning encompassing normal and appropriate editing practices such as merely editing the same page as another user, or warning another user for disruption or incivility. Such activities are not harassment if done civilly and in good faith.
It is also not harassment to track a user's contributions for policy violations (see above); that is part of what editor contribution histories are for. Editors do not own article content, or their own edits, and any other editor has the right to revert edits as appropriate. Unwarranted resistance to such efforts may be a sign of ownership behavior and lead to sanctions.
Unfounded accusations of harassment are a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly.
See also
- Misplaced Pages:Wikibullying
- Misplaced Pages:How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages, a page that provides a list of items to help prevent being outed.
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Personal attacks
- Misplaced Pages:Casting aspersions – accusing others of misbehavior without evidence.
- Misplaced Pages:WikiLawyering
- Wikimedia:Non-discrimination policy
- WMF Community health initiative, an anti-harassment project underway starting in 2017
- meta:Research:Harassment survey 2015
- Misplaced Pages:Ragpicking
Notes
- ^ The definition of "on Misplaced Pages" has previously been the subject of dispute. A September 2019 RfC clarified that even if a user voluntarily posts their own personal information on a Wikimedia project that is not the English Misplaced Pages, it may still be outing under certain circumstances to re-post that information on the English Misplaced Pages.
- It is generally more acceptable to reference information voluntarily disclosed only on another Wikimedia project if it is clear the user does not mind wider dissemination (e.g. posted on a user's public userpage at another Wikimedia wiki) and less acceptable if it requires much "research" to find (particularly information later removed by the user in question).
- Editors are urged to take care to err on the side of privacy, and to ask users before posting their personal information if there is any doubt. Posting information which might not constitute outing per se can still be unwise and reflect poorly on the poster's judgment.
- See Konieczny, Piotr (2018), Volunteer Retention, Burnout and Dropout in Online Voluntary Organizations: Stress, Conflict and Retirement of Wikipedians, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 42, Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 199–219, doi:10.1108/s0163-786x20180000042008, ISBN 978-1-78756-895-2, S2CID 155122668
Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content (?) |
| ||||||||||
Conduct (?) |
| ||||||||||
Deletion (?) |
| ||||||||||
Enforcement (?) |
| ||||||||||
Editing (?) |
| ||||||||||
Project content (?) |
| ||||||||||
WMF (?) |
| ||||||||||
This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus. | Shortcuts |
This page in a nutshell: Do not stop other editors from enjoying Misplaced Pages by making threats, repeated annoying and unwanted contacts, repeated personal attacks, intimidation, or posting personal information. |
If you are a user who is being harassed, see § Dealing with harassment. |
Conduct policies |
---|
Harassment is a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually, the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine, frighten, or discourage them from editing.
Misplaced Pages must never be misused to harass anyone, whether or not the subject of the harassment is an editor here. Edits constituting harassment will be reverted, deleted, or suppressed, as appropriate, and editors who engage in harassment are subject to blocking and banning.
Harassment can include actions calculated to be noticed by the target and clearly suggestive of targeting them, even when no direct communication takes place.
Types of harassment and disruption
See also: Misplaced Pages:Civility § Identifying incivility, and Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks
Harassment, including threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Misplaced Pages and thus cause disruption to the project. Harassment of an editor on the basis of race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religious or political beliefs, disability, ethnicity, nationality, etc. is not allowed.
The prohibition against harassment applies equally to all Wikipedians. It is as unacceptable to harass a user with a history of inept or disruptive behavior as it is to harass any other user. Misplaced Pages encourages a civil community: people make mistakes, but they are encouraged to learn from them and change their ways. Harassment is contrary to this spirit and damaging to the work of building an encyclopedia.
Hounding
ShortcutsHounding on Misplaced Pages (or "wikihounding") is the singling out of one or more editors, joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Misplaced Pages.
Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam. The contribution logs can be used in the dispute resolution process to gather evidence to be presented in incidents and arbitration cases. Using dispute resolution can itself constitute hounding if it involves persistently making frivolous or meritless complaints about another editor.
The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason. Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions.
Threats
Threatening another person is considered harassment. This includes any real-world threats, such as threats of harm, and threats to disrupt a person's work on Misplaced Pages. Statements of intent to properly use normal Misplaced Pages processes, such as dispute resolution, are not threats. Legal threats are a special case of threat, with their own settled policy. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely.
Perceived legal threats
Main page: Misplaced Pages:No legal threats ShortcutMisplaced Pages has a policy of blocking users who post legal threats on Misplaced Pages against other editors. It is important not to post comments that others may reasonably interpret as a legal threat; words such as libelous or defamatory are best avoided for that reason. In handling apparent legal threats, users should seek to clarify the poster's intention, explain the policy, and ask them to remove the threat. That users are involved in a legal dispute with each other is not a reason to block, so long as no legal threats are posted on Misplaced Pages.
Posting of personal information
Shortcuts "WP:PRIVACY" redirects here. For the Wikimedia privacy policy, see Wikimedia:Privacy policy. See also: Doxing, Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing, and Arbitration Committee response to the Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outingPosting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person has voluntarily posted their own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. Personal information includes an editor's real-life name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, personal profiles on external sites, other contact information, or photograph, whether such information is accurate or not. Posting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of privacy and may place that editor at risk of harm outside their activities on Misplaced Pages. Unless unintentional and non-malicious (for example, where Wikipedians know each other off-site and may inadvertently post personal information, such as using the other person's real name in discussions), attempted outing is sufficient grounds for an immediate block. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors.
How to deal with personal information
If you have accidentally posted anything that might lead to you being outed (including but not limited to inadvertently editing while logged out, which reveals your IP address, and thus, your approximate location), it is important that you act promptly to have the edit(s) oversighted. Do not otherwise draw attention to the information. Referring to still-existing, self-disclosed posted information is not considered outing, and so the failure of an editor to have the information redacted in a timely manner may remove it from protection by this policy. Further information about protecting private information is at Personal security practices, On privacy, and How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages.
Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for oversight to delete that edit from Misplaced Pages. Any administrator may redact it pending oversight, even when the administrator is involved. If an editor has previously posted their own personal information but later redacted it, it should not be repeated on Misplaced Pages, although references to still-existing, self-disclosed information are not considered outing. If the previously posted information has been removed by oversight, then repeating it on Misplaced Pages is considered outing.
If you see an editor post personal information about another person, do not confirm or deny the accuracy of the information. Doing so would give the person posting the information, and anyone else who saw the page, feedback on the accuracy of the material. For the same reason, do not treat incorrect attempts at outing any differently from correct attempts. When reporting an attempted outing take care not to comment on the accuracy of the information. Outing should usually be described as "an attempted outing" or similar, to make it clear that the information may or may not be true, and it should be made clear to the users blocked for outing that the block log and notice does not confirm the information.
The fact that an editor has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse to post the results of "opposition research". Dredging up their off-site opinions to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be. Threats to out an editor will be treated as a personal attack and are prohibited.
Exceptions
Nothing in this policy prohibits the emailing of personal information about editors to individual administrators, functionaries, or arbitrators, or to the Wikimedia Foundation, when doing so is necessary to report violations of confidentiality-sensitive policies (such as conflict of interest or paid editing, harassment, or violations of the child-protection policy). Only the minimum information necessary should be conveyed and the minimum number of people contacted. Editors are warned, however, that the community has rejected the idea that editors should "investigate" each other. Posting such information on Misplaced Pages violates this policy.
Posting links to other accounts on other websites is allowable in specific situations (but see also Misplaced Pages:Linking to external harassment):
- There are job posting sites where employers publicly post advertisements to recruit paid Misplaced Pages editors. Linking to such an ad in a forum such as the Conflict of interest noticeboard is not a violation of this policy.
- If individuals have identified themselves without redacting or having it oversighted, such information can be used for discussions of conflict of interest (COI) in appropriate forums.
- If redacted or oversighted personally identifying material is important to the COI discussion, then it should be emailed privately to an administrator or arbitrator—but not repeated on Misplaced Pages: it will be sufficient to say that the editor in question has a COI and the information has been emailed to the appropriate administrative authority.
- To combat impersonation (an editor claiming falsely to be a particular person), it is permissible to post or link to disavowals from that person, provided that the person has explicitly and in good faith given their consent, and provided that there is a high degree of confidence in the authenticity of the source.
Issues involving private personal information (of anyone) could also be referred by email to a member of the functionaries team. While in the limited circumstances outlined above, links to external websites containing solicitations to edit Misplaced Pages may be posted on Misplaced Pages to demonstrate that there may be conflict of interest editing, links to personal profiles on external sites should not be connected to any specific Misplaced Pages editor unless that editor discloses it themselves.
Private correspondence
Shortcuts See also: Misplaced Pages:Private correspondenceThere is no community consensus regarding the posting of private off-wiki correspondence.
The Arbitration Committee has stated a principle that "In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki" and in a second principle that "Any uninvolved administrator may remove private correspondence that has been posted without the consent of any of the creators. Such material should instead be sent directly to the Committee."
User space harassment
Shortcut See also: Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed commentsA common problem is harassment in userspace. Examples include placing numerous false or questionable "warnings" on a user's talk page, restoring such comments after a user has removed them, placing "suspected sockpuppet" and similar tags on the user page of active contributors, and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space.
User pages are provided so that editors can provide some general information about themselves and user talk pages are to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues. Any sort of content which truly needs to be displayed, or removed, should be immediately brought to the attention of admins rather than edit warring to enforce your views on the content of someone else's user space.
Off-wiki harassment
Shortcut See also: Linking to external harassment and Misplaced Pages is not compulsoryInappropriate or unwanted public or private communication, following, or any form of hounding, when directed at another editor, violates the harassment policy. Off-wiki harassment, including through the use of external links, will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases. In some cases, evidence should be submitted by private email. As is the case with on-wiki harassment, off-wiki harassment can be grounds for blocking, and in extreme cases, banning.
Editors who welcome private communication typically post their preferred contact information on Misplaced Pages, sometimes enabling email through the Misplaced Pages interface. Contacting an editor using any other contact information, without first obtaining explicit permission, should be assumed to be uninvited and, depending on the context, may be harassment. Never contact another editor in this way as part of a dispute, or when the editor has asked not to be contacted that way. Unexpected contact using personal information as described above in Posting of personal information may be perceived as a threat to the safety and well-being of the person being contacted. Users who experience inappropriate off-wiki contact should report occurrences privately to the Arbitration Committee or to the emergency response team.
Harassing those outside of the editing community
ShortcutIn alignment with the protection of editors from harassment described throughout the rest of this policy, edits that harass living or recently deceased people who are not members of the Misplaced Pages community are also prohibited. Per the oversight policy, harassing content will be deleted or suppressed. Editors who post such material in any namespace may be indefinitely blocked.
Content and sourcing that comply with the biographies of living persons policy do not violate this policy; neither do discussions about sources and authors of sources, unless comments about persons are gratuitous to determining source quality. See also WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLPCOI, and the associated discretionary sanctions.
Dealing with harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:How to deal with harassment ShortcutIf you feel you are being harassed, first and foremost, act calmly (even if difficult). It is hard to overemphasize this.
If the harassment includes threats of physical harm to you or others, follow the procedures on dealing with threats of harm.
In serious cases or where privacy and off-wiki aspects are an issue (e.g., where private personal information is a part of the issue, or on-wiki issues spread to email and 'real world' harassment, or similar), you can contact the Arbitration Committee. To have personal information removed from page histories contact the oversight team.
For simpler, on-wiki matters, such as a user with whom you have arguments, see dispute resolution as the usual first step. It makes it easier to identify the problem you are having if there are some specific diffs. For more serious cases where you are willing to address it on-wiki, you may request administrative assistance. (Do not open a discussion about outing on behalf of a third party without the victim's permission, unless the relevant page revisions have already been oversighted. It is important not to make violations of privacy more severe.)
Note: If other editors have concerns over your editing, then you will quite likely gain attention from administrators and other concerned users as a result. Any civil and appropriate comments addressed by them to you would not be considered harassment.
Accusing others of harassment
ShortcutMaking accusations of harassment can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a personal attack if harassment is alleged without clear evidence that the others' action is actually harassment, and unfounded accusations may constitute harassment themselves if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of harassment on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle. At the same time, claims of harassment should be taken seriously and not be summarily dismissed unless it becomes clear the accusations are not well-founded.
Assistance for administrators being harassed
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Admins willing to make difficult blocksMisplaced Pages administrators' actions can bring them into direct conflict with difficult users and at times they too are harassed. Typically this happens when an administrator decides to intervene in a dispute with a view to warning or blocking disruptive parties or preventing their continual troublesome behavior.
Administrators are volunteer editors like any other user. They are not obligated any more than any other user to take any specific action beyond expected good conduct and responsiveness, and they are not required or expected to place themselves in an uncomfortable situation, to undertake actions which will diminish their enjoyment of working on Misplaced Pages or place themselves at risk in any way. Administrators who feel that they may have such a situation are advised to seek advice, discuss privately with other administrators, or pass the matter to another administrator willing to make difficult blocks.
Administrators who are confident they are safe from harassment, or willing to address difficult users and their potential actions, may wish to list themselves on the above page, and add the userbox template {{User difficultblocks}} to their user page, which also adds the user to Category:Misplaced Pages administrators willing to make difficult blocks
This administrator can and will make difficult blocks if needed. |
- Or use: ]
In case of problems, administrators have exactly the same right as any other user to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to contact the Arbitration Committee if needed.
Reactions to harassment
Some people may find it hard to remain calm and to react constructively in the face of real or perceived harassment. It is important that any allegations of misconduct about someone who is being harassed be considered in this context. Suffering real or perceived harassment does not justify an editor's misconduct, but a more cautious approach to sanctions in such situations is preferred.
Consequences of harassment
Although editors are encouraged to ignore or respond politely to isolated incidents, that should not imply that they are acceptable or without consequences. A pattern of hostility reduces the likelihood of the community assuming good faith, and can be considered disruptive editing. Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by harassment and/or personal attacks are likely to become involved in the dispute resolution process, and may face serious consequences such as blocks, arbitration, or being subjected to a community ban. Harassment negatively affects editor retention.
Blocking for harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks § Consequences of personal attacks- In extreme cases, such as legal threats, threats of violence, or outing, protective blocks may be employed without prior warnings.
- Incidents of wikihounding generally receive a warning. If wikihounding persists after a warning, escalating blocks are often used, beginning with 24 hours.
What harassment is not
Shortcut
This policy is aimed to protect victims of genuine harassment which is meant to cause distress to the user, such as repeated and unwanted correspondence or postings. Like the word stalk, harass carries real-life connotations – from simple unseemly behavior to criminal conduct – and must be used judiciously and with respect to these connotations.
However, some editors seem to give "harassment" a much broader, and inappropriate, meaning encompassing normal and appropriate editing practices such as merely editing the same page as another user, or warning another user for disruption or incivility. Such activities are not harassment if done civilly and in good faith.
It is also not harassment to track a user's contributions for policy violations (see above); that is part of what editor contribution histories are for. Editors do not own article content, or their own edits, and any other editor has the right to revert edits as appropriate. Unwarranted resistance to such efforts may be a sign of ownership behavior and lead to sanctions.
Unfounded accusations of harassment are a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly.
See also
- Misplaced Pages:Wikibullying
- Misplaced Pages:How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages, a page that provides a list of items to help prevent being outed.
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Personal attacks
- Misplaced Pages:Casting aspersions – accusing others of misbehavior without evidence.
- Misplaced Pages:WikiLawyering
- Wikimedia:Non-discrimination policy
- WMF Community health initiative, an anti-harassment project underway starting in 2017
- meta:Research:Harassment survey 2015
- Misplaced Pages:Ragpicking
Notes
- ^ The definition of "on Misplaced Pages" has previously been the subject of dispute. A September 2019 RfC clarified that even if a user voluntarily posts their own personal information on a Wikimedia project that is not the English Misplaced Pages, it may still be outing under certain circumstances to re-post that information on the English Misplaced Pages.
- It is generally more acceptable to reference information voluntarily disclosed only on another Wikimedia project if it is clear the user does not mind wider dissemination (e.g. posted on a user's public userpage at another Wikimedia wiki) and less acceptable if it requires much "research" to find (particularly information later removed by the user in question).
- Editors are urged to take care to err on the side of privacy, and to ask users before posting their personal information if there is any doubt. Posting information which might not constitute outing per se can still be unwise and reflect poorly on the poster's judgment.
- See Konieczny, Piotr (2018), Volunteer Retention, Burnout and Dropout in Online Voluntary Organizations: Stress, Conflict and Retirement of Wikipedians, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 42, Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 199–219, doi:10.1108/s0163-786x20180000042008, ISBN 978-1-78756-895-2, S2CID 155122668
Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content (?) |
| ||||||||||
Conduct (?) |
| ||||||||||
Deletion (?) |
| ||||||||||
Enforcement (?) |
| ||||||||||
Editing (?) |
| ||||||||||
Project content (?) |
| ||||||||||
WMF (?) |
| ||||||||||
Misplaced Pages essays (?) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus. | Shortcuts |
This page in a nutshell: Do not stop other editors from enjoying Misplaced Pages by making threats, repeated annoying and unwanted contacts, repeated personal attacks, intimidation, or posting personal information. |
If you are a user who is being harassed, see § Dealing with harassment. |
Conduct policies |
---|
Harassment is a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually, the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine, frighten, or discourage them from editing.
Misplaced Pages must never be misused to harass anyone, whether or not the subject of the harassment is an editor here. Edits constituting harassment will be reverted, deleted, or suppressed, as appropriate, and editors who engage in harassment are subject to blocking and banning.
Harassment can include actions calculated to be noticed by the target and clearly suggestive of targeting them, even when no direct communication takes place.
Types of harassment and disruption
See also: Misplaced Pages:Civility § Identifying incivility, and Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks
Harassment, including threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Misplaced Pages and thus cause disruption to the project. Harassment of an editor on the basis of race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religious or political beliefs, disability, ethnicity, nationality, etc. is not allowed.
The prohibition against harassment applies equally to all Wikipedians. It is as unacceptable to harass a user with a history of inept or disruptive behavior as it is to harass any other user. Misplaced Pages encourages a civil community: people make mistakes, but they are encouraged to learn from them and change their ways. Harassment is contrary to this spirit and damaging to the work of building an encyclopedia.
Hounding
ShortcutsHounding on Misplaced Pages (or "wikihounding") is the singling out of one or more editors, joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Misplaced Pages.
Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam. The contribution logs can be used in the dispute resolution process to gather evidence to be presented in incidents and arbitration cases. Using dispute resolution can itself constitute hounding if it involves persistently making frivolous or meritless complaints about another editor.
The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason. Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions.
Threats
Threatening another person is considered harassment. This includes any real-world threats, such as threats of harm, and threats to disrupt a person's work on Misplaced Pages. Statements of intent to properly use normal Misplaced Pages processes, such as dispute resolution, are not threats. Legal threats are a special case of threat, with their own settled policy. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely.
Perceived legal threats
Main page: Misplaced Pages:No legal threats ShortcutMisplaced Pages has a policy of blocking users who post legal threats on Misplaced Pages against other editors. It is important not to post comments that others may reasonably interpret as a legal threat; words such as libelous or defamatory are best avoided for that reason. In handling apparent legal threats, users should seek to clarify the poster's intention, explain the policy, and ask them to remove the threat. That users are involved in a legal dispute with each other is not a reason to block, so long as no legal threats are posted on Misplaced Pages.
Posting of personal information
Shortcuts "WP:PRIVACY" redirects here. For the Wikimedia privacy policy, see Wikimedia:Privacy policy. See also: Doxing, Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing, and Arbitration Committee response to the Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outingPosting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person has voluntarily posted their own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. Personal information includes an editor's real-life name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, personal profiles on external sites, other contact information, or photograph, whether such information is accurate or not. Posting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of privacy and may place that editor at risk of harm outside their activities on Misplaced Pages. Unless unintentional and non-malicious (for example, where Wikipedians know each other off-site and may inadvertently post personal information, such as using the other person's real name in discussions), attempted outing is sufficient grounds for an immediate block. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors.
How to deal with personal information
If you have accidentally posted anything that might lead to you being outed (including but not limited to inadvertently editing while logged out, which reveals your IP address, and thus, your approximate location), it is important that you act promptly to have the edit(s) oversighted. Do not otherwise draw attention to the information. Referring to still-existing, self-disclosed posted information is not considered outing, and so the failure of an editor to have the information redacted in a timely manner may remove it from protection by this policy. Further information about protecting private information is at Personal security practices, On privacy, and How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages.
Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for oversight to delete that edit from Misplaced Pages. Any administrator may redact it pending oversight, even when the administrator is involved. If an editor has previously posted their own personal information but later redacted it, it should not be repeated on Misplaced Pages, although references to still-existing, self-disclosed information are not considered outing. If the previously posted information has been removed by oversight, then repeating it on Misplaced Pages is considered outing.
If you see an editor post personal information about another person, do not confirm or deny the accuracy of the information. Doing so would give the person posting the information, and anyone else who saw the page, feedback on the accuracy of the material. For the same reason, do not treat incorrect attempts at outing any differently from correct attempts. When reporting an attempted outing take care not to comment on the accuracy of the information. Outing should usually be described as "an attempted outing" or similar, to make it clear that the information may or may not be true, and it should be made clear to the users blocked for outing that the block log and notice does not confirm the information.
The fact that an editor has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse to post the results of "opposition research". Dredging up their off-site opinions to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be. Threats to out an editor will be treated as a personal attack and are prohibited.
Exceptions
Nothing in this policy prohibits the emailing of personal information about editors to individual administrators, functionaries, or arbitrators, or to the Wikimedia Foundation, when doing so is necessary to report violations of confidentiality-sensitive policies (such as conflict of interest or paid editing, harassment, or violations of the child-protection policy). Only the minimum information necessary should be conveyed and the minimum number of people contacted. Editors are warned, however, that the community has rejected the idea that editors should "investigate" each other. Posting such information on Misplaced Pages violates this policy.
Posting links to other accounts on other websites is allowable in specific situations (but see also Misplaced Pages:Linking to external harassment):
- There are job posting sites where employers publicly post advertisements to recruit paid Misplaced Pages editors. Linking to such an ad in a forum such as the Conflict of interest noticeboard is not a violation of this policy.
- If individuals have identified themselves without redacting or having it oversighted, such information can be used for discussions of conflict of interest (COI) in appropriate forums.
- If redacted or oversighted personally identifying material is important to the COI discussion, then it should be emailed privately to an administrator or arbitrator—but not repeated on Misplaced Pages: it will be sufficient to say that the editor in question has a COI and the information has been emailed to the appropriate administrative authority.
- To combat impersonation (an editor claiming falsely to be a particular person), it is permissible to post or link to disavowals from that person, provided that the person has explicitly and in good faith given their consent, and provided that there is a high degree of confidence in the authenticity of the source.
Issues involving private personal information (of anyone) could also be referred by email to a member of the functionaries team. While in the limited circumstances outlined above, links to external websites containing solicitations to edit Misplaced Pages may be posted on Misplaced Pages to demonstrate that there may be conflict of interest editing, links to personal profiles on external sites should not be connected to any specific Misplaced Pages editor unless that editor discloses it themselves.
Private correspondence
Shortcuts See also: Misplaced Pages:Private correspondenceThere is no community consensus regarding the posting of private off-wiki correspondence.
The Arbitration Committee has stated a principle that "In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki" and in a second principle that "Any uninvolved administrator may remove private correspondence that has been posted without the consent of any of the creators. Such material should instead be sent directly to the Committee."
User space harassment
Shortcut See also: Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed commentsA common problem is harassment in userspace. Examples include placing numerous false or questionable "warnings" on a user's talk page, restoring such comments after a user has removed them, placing "suspected sockpuppet" and similar tags on the user page of active contributors, and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space.
User pages are provided so that editors can provide some general information about themselves and user talk pages are to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues. Any sort of content which truly needs to be displayed, or removed, should be immediately brought to the attention of admins rather than edit warring to enforce your views on the content of someone else's user space.
Off-wiki harassment
Shortcut See also: Linking to external harassment and Misplaced Pages is not compulsoryInappropriate or unwanted public or private communication, following, or any form of hounding, when directed at another editor, violates the harassment policy. Off-wiki harassment, including through the use of external links, will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases. In some cases, evidence should be submitted by private email. As is the case with on-wiki harassment, off-wiki harassment can be grounds for blocking, and in extreme cases, banning.
Editors who welcome private communication typically post their preferred contact information on Misplaced Pages, sometimes enabling email through the Misplaced Pages interface. Contacting an editor using any other contact information, without first obtaining explicit permission, should be assumed to be uninvited and, depending on the context, may be harassment. Never contact another editor in this way as part of a dispute, or when the editor has asked not to be contacted that way. Unexpected contact using personal information as described above in Posting of personal information may be perceived as a threat to the safety and well-being of the person being contacted. Users who experience inappropriate off-wiki contact should report occurrences privately to the Arbitration Committee or to the emergency response team.
Harassing those outside of the editing community
ShortcutIn alignment with the protection of editors from harassment described throughout the rest of this policy, edits that harass living or recently deceased people who are not members of the Misplaced Pages community are also prohibited. Per the oversight policy, harassing content will be deleted or suppressed. Editors who post such material in any namespace may be indefinitely blocked.
Content and sourcing that comply with the biographies of living persons policy do not violate this policy; neither do discussions about sources and authors of sources, unless comments about persons are gratuitous to determining source quality. See also WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLPCOI, and the associated discretionary sanctions.
Dealing with harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:How to deal with harassment ShortcutIf you feel you are being harassed, first and foremost, act calmly (even if difficult). It is hard to overemphasize this.
If the harassment includes threats of physical harm to you or others, follow the procedures on dealing with threats of harm.
In serious cases or where privacy and off-wiki aspects are an issue (e.g., where private personal information is a part of the issue, or on-wiki issues spread to email and 'real world' harassment, or similar), you can contact the Arbitration Committee. To have personal information removed from page histories contact the oversight team.
For simpler, on-wiki matters, such as a user with whom you have arguments, see dispute resolution as the usual first step. It makes it easier to identify the problem you are having if there are some specific diffs. For more serious cases where you are willing to address it on-wiki, you may request administrative assistance. (Do not open a discussion about outing on behalf of a third party without the victim's permission, unless the relevant page revisions have already been oversighted. It is important not to make violations of privacy more severe.)
Note: If other editors have concerns over your editing, then you will quite likely gain attention from administrators and other concerned users as a result. Any civil and appropriate comments addressed by them to you would not be considered harassment.
Accusing others of harassment
ShortcutMaking accusations of harassment can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a personal attack if harassment is alleged without clear evidence that the others' action is actually harassment, and unfounded accusations may constitute harassment themselves if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of harassment on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle. At the same time, claims of harassment should be taken seriously and not be summarily dismissed unless it becomes clear the accusations are not well-founded.
Assistance for administrators being harassed
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Admins willing to make difficult blocksMisplaced Pages administrators' actions can bring them into direct conflict with difficult users and at times they too are harassed. Typically this happens when an administrator decides to intervene in a dispute with a view to warning or blocking disruptive parties or preventing their continual troublesome behavior.
Administrators are volunteer editors like any other user. They are not obligated any more than any other user to take any specific action beyond expected good conduct and responsiveness, and they are not required or expected to place themselves in an uncomfortable situation, to undertake actions which will diminish their enjoyment of working on Misplaced Pages or place themselves at risk in any way. Administrators who feel that they may have such a situation are advised to seek advice, discuss privately with other administrators, or pass the matter to another administrator willing to make difficult blocks.
Administrators who are confident they are safe from harassment, or willing to address difficult users and their potential actions, may wish to list themselves on the above page, and add the userbox template {{User difficultblocks}} to their user page, which also adds the user to Category:Misplaced Pages administrators willing to make difficult blocks
This administrator can and will make difficult blocks if needed. |
- Or use: ]
In case of problems, administrators have exactly the same right as any other user to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to contact the Arbitration Committee if needed.
Reactions to harassment
Some people may find it hard to remain calm and to react constructively in the face of real or perceived harassment. It is important that any allegations of misconduct about someone who is being harassed be considered in this context. Suffering real or perceived harassment does not justify an editor's misconduct, but a more cautious approach to sanctions in such situations is preferred.
Consequences of harassment
Although editors are encouraged to ignore or respond politely to isolated incidents, that should not imply that they are acceptable or without consequences. A pattern of hostility reduces the likelihood of the community assuming good faith, and can be considered disruptive editing. Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by harassment and/or personal attacks are likely to become involved in the dispute resolution process, and may face serious consequences such as blocks, arbitration, or being subjected to a community ban. Harassment negatively affects editor retention.
Blocking for harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks § Consequences of personal attacks- In extreme cases, such as legal threats, threats of violence, or outing, protective blocks may be employed without prior warnings.
- Incidents of wikihounding generally receive a warning. If wikihounding persists after a warning, escalating blocks are often used, beginning with 24 hours.
What harassment is not
Shortcut
This policy is aimed to protect victims of genuine harassment which is meant to cause distress to the user, such as repeated and unwanted correspondence or postings. Like the word stalk, harass carries real-life connotations – from simple unseemly behavior to criminal conduct – and must be used judiciously and with respect to these connotations.
However, some editors seem to give "harassment" a much broader, and inappropriate, meaning encompassing normal and appropriate editing practices such as merely editing the same page as another user, or warning another user for disruption or incivility. Such activities are not harassment if done civilly and in good faith.
It is also not harassment to track a user's contributions for policy violations (see above); that is part of what editor contribution histories are for. Editors do not own article content, or their own edits, and any other editor has the right to revert edits as appropriate. Unwarranted resistance to such efforts may be a sign of ownership behavior and lead to sanctions.
Unfounded accusations of harassment are a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly.
See also
- Misplaced Pages:Wikibullying
- Misplaced Pages:How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages, a page that provides a list of items to help prevent being outed.
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Personal attacks
- Misplaced Pages:Casting aspersions – accusing others of misbehavior without evidence.
- Misplaced Pages:WikiLawyering
- Wikimedia:Non-discrimination policy
- WMF Community health initiative, an anti-harassment project underway starting in 2017
- meta:Research:Harassment survey 2015
- Misplaced Pages:Ragpicking
Notes
- ^ The definition of "on Misplaced Pages" has previously been the subject of dispute. A September 2019 RfC clarified that even if a user voluntarily posts their own personal information on a Wikimedia project that is not the English Misplaced Pages, it may still be outing under certain circumstances to re-post that information on the English Misplaced Pages.
- It is generally more acceptable to reference information voluntarily disclosed only on another Wikimedia project if it is clear the user does not mind wider dissemination (e.g. posted on a user's public userpage at another Wikimedia wiki) and less acceptable if it requires much "research" to find (particularly information later removed by the user in question).
- Editors are urged to take care to err on the side of privacy, and to ask users before posting their personal information if there is any doubt. Posting information which might not constitute outing per se can still be unwise and reflect poorly on the poster's judgment.
- See Konieczny, Piotr (2018), Volunteer Retention, Burnout and Dropout in Online Voluntary Organizations: Stress, Conflict and Retirement of Wikipedians, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 42, Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 199–219, doi:10.1108/s0163-786x20180000042008, ISBN 978-1-78756-895-2, S2CID 155122668
Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content (?) |
| ||||||||||
Conduct (?) |
| ||||||||||
Deletion (?) |
| ||||||||||
Enforcement (?) |
| ||||||||||
Editing (?) |
| ||||||||||
Project content (?) |
| ||||||||||
WMF (?) |
| ||||||||||
Misplaced Pages essays (?) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus. | Shortcuts |
This page in a nutshell: Do not stop other editors from enjoying Misplaced Pages by making threats, repeated annoying and unwanted contacts, repeated personal attacks, intimidation, or posting personal information. |
If you are a user who is being harassed, see § Dealing with harassment. |
Conduct policies |
---|
Harassment is a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually, the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine, frighten, or discourage them from editing.
Misplaced Pages must never be misused to harass anyone, whether or not the subject of the harassment is an editor here. Edits constituting harassment will be reverted, deleted, or suppressed, as appropriate, and editors who engage in harassment are subject to blocking and banning.
Harassment can include actions calculated to be noticed by the target and clearly suggestive of targeting them, even when no direct communication takes place.
Types of harassment and disruption
See also: Misplaced Pages:Civility § Identifying incivility, and Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks
Harassment, including threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Misplaced Pages and thus cause disruption to the project. Harassment of an editor on the basis of race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religious or political beliefs, disability, ethnicity, nationality, etc. is not allowed.
The prohibition against harassment applies equally to all Wikipedians. It is as unacceptable to harass a user with a history of inept or disruptive behavior as it is to harass any other user. Misplaced Pages encourages a civil community: people make mistakes, but they are encouraged to learn from them and change their ways. Harassment is contrary to this spirit and damaging to the work of building an encyclopedia.
Hounding
ShortcutsHounding on Misplaced Pages (or "wikihounding") is the singling out of one or more editors, joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Misplaced Pages.
Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam. The contribution logs can be used in the dispute resolution process to gather evidence to be presented in incidents and arbitration cases. Using dispute resolution can itself constitute hounding if it involves persistently making frivolous or meritless complaints about another editor.
The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason. Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions.
Threats
Threatening another person is considered harassment. This includes any real-world threats, such as threats of harm, and threats to disrupt a person's work on Misplaced Pages. Statements of intent to properly use normal Misplaced Pages processes, such as dispute resolution, are not threats. Legal threats are a special case of threat, with their own settled policy. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely.
Perceived legal threats
Main page: Misplaced Pages:No legal threats ShortcutMisplaced Pages has a policy of blocking users who post legal threats on Misplaced Pages against other editors. It is important not to post comments that others may reasonably interpret as a legal threat; words such as libelous or defamatory are best avoided for that reason. In handling apparent legal threats, users should seek to clarify the poster's intention, explain the policy, and ask them to remove the threat. That users are involved in a legal dispute with each other is not a reason to block, so long as no legal threats are posted on Misplaced Pages.
Posting of personal information
Shortcuts "WP:PRIVACY" redirects here. For the Wikimedia privacy policy, see Wikimedia:Privacy policy. See also: Doxing, Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing, and Arbitration Committee response to the Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outingPosting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person has voluntarily posted their own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. Personal information includes an editor's real-life name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, personal profiles on external sites, other contact information, or photograph, whether such information is accurate or not. Posting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of privacy and may place that editor at risk of harm outside their activities on Misplaced Pages. Unless unintentional and non-malicious (for example, where Wikipedians know each other off-site and may inadvertently post personal information, such as using the other person's real name in discussions), attempted outing is sufficient grounds for an immediate block. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors.
How to deal with personal information
If you have accidentally posted anything that might lead to you being outed (including but not limited to inadvertently editing while logged out, which reveals your IP address, and thus, your approximate location), it is important that you act promptly to have the edit(s) oversighted. Do not otherwise draw attention to the information. Referring to still-existing, self-disclosed posted information is not considered outing, and so the failure of an editor to have the information redacted in a timely manner may remove it from protection by this policy. Further information about protecting private information is at Personal security practices, On privacy, and How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages.
Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for oversight to delete that edit from Misplaced Pages. Any administrator may redact it pending oversight, even when the administrator is involved. If an editor has previously posted their own personal information but later redacted it, it should not be repeated on Misplaced Pages, although references to still-existing, self-disclosed information are not considered outing. If the previously posted information has been removed by oversight, then repeating it on Misplaced Pages is considered outing.
If you see an editor post personal information about another person, do not confirm or deny the accuracy of the information. Doing so would give the person posting the information, and anyone else who saw the page, feedback on the accuracy of the material. For the same reason, do not treat incorrect attempts at outing any differently from correct attempts. When reporting an attempted outing take care not to comment on the accuracy of the information. Outing should usually be described as "an attempted outing" or similar, to make it clear that the information may or may not be true, and it should be made clear to the users blocked for outing that the block log and notice does not confirm the information.
The fact that an editor has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse to post the results of "opposition research". Dredging up their off-site opinions to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be. Threats to out an editor will be treated as a personal attack and are prohibited.
Exceptions
Nothing in this policy prohibits the emailing of personal information about editors to individual administrators, functionaries, or arbitrators, or to the Wikimedia Foundation, when doing so is necessary to report violations of confidentiality-sensitive policies (such as conflict of interest or paid editing, harassment, or violations of the child-protection policy). Only the minimum information necessary should be conveyed and the minimum number of people contacted. Editors are warned, however, that the community has rejected the idea that editors should "investigate" each other. Posting such information on Misplaced Pages violates this policy.
Posting links to other accounts on other websites is allowable in specific situations (but see also Misplaced Pages:Linking to external harassment):
- There are job posting sites where employers publicly post advertisements to recruit paid Misplaced Pages editors. Linking to such an ad in a forum such as the Conflict of interest noticeboard is not a violation of this policy.
- If individuals have identified themselves without redacting or having it oversighted, such information can be used for discussions of conflict of interest (COI) in appropriate forums.
- If redacted or oversighted personally identifying material is important to the COI discussion, then it should be emailed privately to an administrator or arbitrator—but not repeated on Misplaced Pages: it will be sufficient to say that the editor in question has a COI and the information has been emailed to the appropriate administrative authority.
- To combat impersonation (an editor claiming falsely to be a particular person), it is permissible to post or link to disavowals from that person, provided that the person has explicitly and in good faith given their consent, and provided that there is a high degree of confidence in the authenticity of the source.
Issues involving private personal information (of anyone) could also be referred by email to a member of the functionaries team. While in the limited circumstances outlined above, links to external websites containing solicitations to edit Misplaced Pages may be posted on Misplaced Pages to demonstrate that there may be conflict of interest editing, links to personal profiles on external sites should not be connected to any specific Misplaced Pages editor unless that editor discloses it themselves.
Private correspondence
Shortcuts See also: Misplaced Pages:Private correspondenceThere is no community consensus regarding the posting of private off-wiki correspondence.
The Arbitration Committee has stated a principle that "In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki" and in a second principle that "Any uninvolved administrator may remove private correspondence that has been posted without the consent of any of the creators. Such material should instead be sent directly to the Committee."
User space harassment
Shortcut See also: Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed commentsA common problem is harassment in userspace. Examples include placing numerous false or questionable "warnings" on a user's talk page, restoring such comments after a user has removed them, placing "suspected sockpuppet" and similar tags on the user page of active contributors, and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space.
User pages are provided so that editors can provide some general information about themselves and user talk pages are to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues. Any sort of content which truly needs to be displayed, or removed, should be immediately brought to the attention of admins rather than edit warring to enforce your views on the content of someone else's user space.
Off-wiki harassment
Shortcut See also: Linking to external harassment and Misplaced Pages is not compulsoryInappropriate or unwanted public or private communication, following, or any form of hounding, when directed at another editor, violates the harassment policy. Off-wiki harassment, including through the use of external links, will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases. In some cases, evidence should be submitted by private email. As is the case with on-wiki harassment, off-wiki harassment can be grounds for blocking, and in extreme cases, banning.
Editors who welcome private communication typically post their preferred contact information on Misplaced Pages, sometimes enabling email through the Misplaced Pages interface. Contacting an editor using any other contact information, without first obtaining explicit permission, should be assumed to be uninvited and, depending on the context, may be harassment. Never contact another editor in this way as part of a dispute, or when the editor has asked not to be contacted that way. Unexpected contact using personal information as described above in Posting of personal information may be perceived as a threat to the safety and well-being of the person being contacted. Users who experience inappropriate off-wiki contact should report occurrences privately to the Arbitration Committee or to the emergency response team.
Harassing those outside of the editing community
ShortcutIn alignment with the protection of editors from harassment described throughout the rest of this policy, edits that harass living or recently deceased people who are not members of the Misplaced Pages community are also prohibited. Per the oversight policy, harassing content will be deleted or suppressed. Editors who post such material in any namespace may be indefinitely blocked.
Content and sourcing that comply with the biographies of living persons policy do not violate this policy; neither do discussions about sources and authors of sources, unless comments about persons are gratuitous to determining source quality. See also WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLPCOI, and the associated discretionary sanctions.
Dealing with harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:How to deal with harassment ShortcutIf you feel you are being harassed, first and foremost, act calmly (even if difficult). It is hard to overemphasize this.
If the harassment includes threats of physical harm to you or others, follow the procedures on dealing with threats of harm.
In serious cases or where privacy and off-wiki aspects are an issue (e.g., where private personal information is a part of the issue, or on-wiki issues spread to email and 'real world' harassment, or similar), you can contact the Arbitration Committee. To have personal information removed from page histories contact the oversight team.
For simpler, on-wiki matters, such as a user with whom you have arguments, see dispute resolution as the usual first step. It makes it easier to identify the problem you are having if there are some specific diffs. For more serious cases where you are willing to address it on-wiki, you may request administrative assistance. (Do not open a discussion about outing on behalf of a third party without the victim's permission, unless the relevant page revisions have already been oversighted. It is important not to make violations of privacy more severe.)
Note: If other editors have concerns over your editing, then you will quite likely gain attention from administrators and other concerned users as a result. Any civil and appropriate comments addressed by them to you would not be considered harassment.
Accusing others of harassment
ShortcutMaking accusations of harassment can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a personal attack if harassment is alleged without clear evidence that the others' action is actually harassment, and unfounded accusations may constitute harassment themselves if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of harassment on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle. At the same time, claims of harassment should be taken seriously and not be summarily dismissed unless it becomes clear the accusations are not well-founded.
Assistance for administrators being harassed
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Admins willing to make difficult blocksMisplaced Pages administrators' actions can bring them into direct conflict with difficult users and at times they too are harassed. Typically this happens when an administrator decides to intervene in a dispute with a view to warning or blocking disruptive parties or preventing their continual troublesome behavior.
Administrators are volunteer editors like any other user. They are not obligated any more than any other user to take any specific action beyond expected good conduct and responsiveness, and they are not required or expected to place themselves in an uncomfortable situation, to undertake actions which will diminish their enjoyment of working on Misplaced Pages or place themselves at risk in any way. Administrators who feel that they may have such a situation are advised to seek advice, discuss privately with other administrators, or pass the matter to another administrator willing to make difficult blocks.
Administrators who are confident they are safe from harassment, or willing to address difficult users and their potential actions, may wish to list themselves on the above page, and add the userbox template {{User difficultblocks}} to their user page, which also adds the user to Category:Misplaced Pages administrators willing to make difficult blocks
This administrator can and will make difficult blocks if needed. |
- Or use: ]
In case of problems, administrators have exactly the same right as any other user to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to contact the Arbitration Committee if needed.
Reactions to harassment
Some people may find it hard to remain calm and to react constructively in the face of real or perceived harassment. It is important that any allegations of misconduct about someone who is being harassed be considered in this context. Suffering real or perceived harassment does not justify an editor's misconduct, but a more cautious approach to sanctions in such situations is preferred.
Consequences of harassment
Although editors are encouraged to ignore or respond politely to isolated incidents, that should not imply that they are acceptable or without consequences. A pattern of hostility reduces the likelihood of the community assuming good faith, and can be considered disruptive editing. Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by harassment and/or personal attacks are likely to become involved in the dispute resolution process, and may face serious consequences such as blocks, arbitration, or being subjected to a community ban. Harassment negatively affects editor retention.
Blocking for harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks § Consequences of personal attacks- In extreme cases, such as legal threats, threats of violence, or outing, protective blocks may be employed without prior warnings.
- Incidents of wikihounding generally receive a warning. If wikihounding persists after a warning, escalating blocks are often used, beginning with 24 hours.
What harassment is not
Shortcut
This policy is aimed to protect victims of genuine harassment which is meant to cause distress to the user, such as repeated and unwanted correspondence or postings. Like the word stalk, harass carries real-life connotations – from simple unseemly behavior to criminal conduct – and must be used judiciously and with respect to these connotations.
However, some editors seem to give "harassment" a much broader, and inappropriate, meaning encompassing normal and appropriate editing practices such as merely editing the same page as another user, or warning another user for disruption or incivility. Such activities are not harassment if done civilly and in good faith.
It is also not harassment to track a user's contributions for policy violations (see above); that is part of what editor contribution histories are for. Editors do not own article content, or their own edits, and any other editor has the right to revert edits as appropriate. Unwarranted resistance to such efforts may be a sign of ownership behavior and lead to sanctions.
Unfounded accusations of harassment are a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly.
See also
- Misplaced Pages:Wikibullying
- Misplaced Pages:How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages, a page that provides a list of items to help prevent being outed.
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Personal attacks
- Misplaced Pages:Casting aspersions – accusing others of misbehavior without evidence.
- Misplaced Pages:WikiLawyering
- Wikimedia:Non-discrimination policy
- WMF Community health initiative, an anti-harassment project underway starting in 2017
- meta:Research:Harassment survey 2015
- Misplaced Pages:Ragpicking
Notes
- ^ The definition of "on Misplaced Pages" has previously been the subject of dispute. A September 2019 RfC clarified that even if a user voluntarily posts their own personal information on a Wikimedia project that is not the English Misplaced Pages, it may still be outing under certain circumstances to re-post that information on the English Misplaced Pages.
- It is generally more acceptable to reference information voluntarily disclosed only on another Wikimedia project if it is clear the user does not mind wider dissemination (e.g. posted on a user's public userpage at another Wikimedia wiki) and less acceptable if it requires much "research" to find (particularly information later removed by the user in question).
- Editors are urged to take care to err on the side of privacy, and to ask users before posting their personal information if there is any doubt. Posting information which might not constitute outing per se can still be unwise and reflect poorly on the poster's judgment.
- See Konieczny, Piotr (2018), Volunteer Retention, Burnout and Dropout in Online Voluntary Organizations: Stress, Conflict and Retirement of Wikipedians, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 42, Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 199–219, doi:10.1108/s0163-786x20180000042008, ISBN 978-1-78756-895-2, S2CID 155122668
Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content (?) |
| ||||||||||
Conduct (?) |
| ||||||||||
Deletion (?) |
| ||||||||||
Enforcement (?) |
| ||||||||||
Editing (?) |
| ||||||||||
Project content (?) |
| ||||||||||
WMF (?) |
| ||||||||||
Misplaced Pages essays (?) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus. | Shortcuts |
This page in a nutshell: Do not stop other editors from enjoying Misplaced Pages by making threats, repeated annoying and unwanted contacts, repeated personal attacks, intimidation, or posting personal information. |
If you are a user who is being harassed, see § Dealing with harassment. |
Conduct policies |
---|
Harassment is a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually, the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine, frighten, or discourage them from editing.
Misplaced Pages must never be misused to harass anyone, whether or not the subject of the harassment is an editor here. Edits constituting harassment will be reverted, deleted, or suppressed, as appropriate, and editors who engage in harassment are subject to blocking and banning.
Harassment can include actions calculated to be noticed by the target and clearly suggestive of targeting them, even when no direct communication takes place.
Types of harassment and disruption
See also: Misplaced Pages:Civility § Identifying incivility, and Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks
Harassment, including threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Misplaced Pages and thus cause disruption to the project. Harassment of an editor on the basis of race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religious or political beliefs, disability, ethnicity, nationality, etc. is not allowed.
The prohibition against harassment applies equally to all Wikipedians. It is as unacceptable to harass a user with a history of inept or disruptive behavior as it is to harass any other user. Misplaced Pages encourages a civil community: people make mistakes, but they are encouraged to learn from them and change their ways. Harassment is contrary to this spirit and damaging to the work of building an encyclopedia.
Hounding
ShortcutsHounding on Misplaced Pages (or "wikihounding") is the singling out of one or more editors, joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Misplaced Pages.
Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam. The contribution logs can be used in the dispute resolution process to gather evidence to be presented in incidents and arbitration cases. Using dispute resolution can itself constitute hounding if it involves persistently making frivolous or meritless complaints about another editor.
The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason. Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions.
Threats
Threatening another person is considered harassment. This includes any real-world threats, such as threats of harm, and threats to disrupt a person's work on Misplaced Pages. Statements of intent to properly use normal Misplaced Pages processes, such as dispute resolution, are not threats. Legal threats are a special case of threat, with their own settled policy. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely.
Perceived legal threats
Main page: Misplaced Pages:No legal threats ShortcutMisplaced Pages has a policy of blocking users who post legal threats on Misplaced Pages against other editors. It is important not to post comments that others may reasonably interpret as a legal threat; words such as libelous or defamatory are best avoided for that reason. In handling apparent legal threats, users should seek to clarify the poster's intention, explain the policy, and ask them to remove the threat. That users are involved in a legal dispute with each other is not a reason to block, so long as no legal threats are posted on Misplaced Pages.
Posting of personal information
Shortcuts "WP:PRIVACY" redirects here. For the Wikimedia privacy policy, see Wikimedia:Privacy policy. See also: Doxing, Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing, and Arbitration Committee response to the Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outingPosting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person has voluntarily posted their own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. Personal information includes an editor's real-life name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, personal profiles on external sites, other contact information, or photograph, whether such information is accurate or not. Posting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of privacy and may place that editor at risk of harm outside their activities on Misplaced Pages. Unless unintentional and non-malicious (for example, where Wikipedians know each other off-site and may inadvertently post personal information, such as using the other person's real name in discussions), attempted outing is sufficient grounds for an immediate block. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors.
How to deal with personal information
If you have accidentally posted anything that might lead to you being outed (including but not limited to inadvertently editing while logged out, which reveals your IP address, and thus, your approximate location), it is important that you act promptly to have the edit(s) oversighted. Do not otherwise draw attention to the information. Referring to still-existing, self-disclosed posted information is not considered outing, and so the failure of an editor to have the information redacted in a timely manner may remove it from protection by this policy. Further information about protecting private information is at Personal security practices, On privacy, and How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages.
Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for oversight to delete that edit from Misplaced Pages. Any administrator may redact it pending oversight, even when the administrator is involved. If an editor has previously posted their own personal information but later redacted it, it should not be repeated on Misplaced Pages, although references to still-existing, self-disclosed information are not considered outing. If the previously posted information has been removed by oversight, then repeating it on Misplaced Pages is considered outing.
If you see an editor post personal information about another person, do not confirm or deny the accuracy of the information. Doing so would give the person posting the information, and anyone else who saw the page, feedback on the accuracy of the material. For the same reason, do not treat incorrect attempts at outing any differently from correct attempts. When reporting an attempted outing take care not to comment on the accuracy of the information. Outing should usually be described as "an attempted outing" or similar, to make it clear that the information may or may not be true, and it should be made clear to the users blocked for outing that the block log and notice does not confirm the information.
The fact that an editor has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse to post the results of "opposition research". Dredging up their off-site opinions to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be. Threats to out an editor will be treated as a personal attack and are prohibited.
Exceptions
Nothing in this policy prohibits the emailing of personal information about editors to individual administrators, functionaries, or arbitrators, or to the Wikimedia Foundation, when doing so is necessary to report violations of confidentiality-sensitive policies (such as conflict of interest or paid editing, harassment, or violations of the child-protection policy). Only the minimum information necessary should be conveyed and the minimum number of people contacted. Editors are warned, however, that the community has rejected the idea that editors should "investigate" each other. Posting such information on Misplaced Pages violates this policy.
Posting links to other accounts on other websites is allowable in specific situations (but see also Misplaced Pages:Linking to external harassment):
- There are job posting sites where employers publicly post advertisements to recruit paid Misplaced Pages editors. Linking to such an ad in a forum such as the Conflict of interest noticeboard is not a violation of this policy.
- If individuals have identified themselves without redacting or having it oversighted, such information can be used for discussions of conflict of interest (COI) in appropriate forums.
- If redacted or oversighted personally identifying material is important to the COI discussion, then it should be emailed privately to an administrator or arbitrator—but not repeated on Misplaced Pages: it will be sufficient to say that the editor in question has a COI and the information has been emailed to the appropriate administrative authority.
- To combat impersonation (an editor claiming falsely to be a particular person), it is permissible to post or link to disavowals from that person, provided that the person has explicitly and in good faith given their consent, and provided that there is a high degree of confidence in the authenticity of the source.
Issues involving private personal information (of anyone) could also be referred by email to a member of the functionaries team. While in the limited circumstances outlined above, links to external websites containing solicitations to edit Misplaced Pages may be posted on Misplaced Pages to demonstrate that there may be conflict of interest editing, links to personal profiles on external sites should not be connected to any specific Misplaced Pages editor unless that editor discloses it themselves.
Private correspondence
Shortcuts See also: Misplaced Pages:Private correspondenceThere is no community consensus regarding the posting of private off-wiki correspondence.
The Arbitration Committee has stated a principle that "In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki" and in a second principle that "Any uninvolved administrator may remove private correspondence that has been posted without the consent of any of the creators. Such material should instead be sent directly to the Committee."
User space harassment
Shortcut See also: Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed commentsA common problem is harassment in userspace. Examples include placing numerous false or questionable "warnings" on a user's talk page, restoring such comments after a user has removed them, placing "suspected sockpuppet" and similar tags on the user page of active contributors, and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space.
User pages are provided so that editors can provide some general information about themselves and user talk pages are to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues. Any sort of content which truly needs to be displayed, or removed, should be immediately brought to the attention of admins rather than edit warring to enforce your views on the content of someone else's user space.
Off-wiki harassment
Shortcut See also: Linking to external harassment and Misplaced Pages is not compulsoryInappropriate or unwanted public or private communication, following, or any form of hounding, when directed at another editor, violates the harassment policy. Off-wiki harassment, including through the use of external links, will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases. In some cases, evidence should be submitted by private email. As is the case with on-wiki harassment, off-wiki harassment can be grounds for blocking, and in extreme cases, banning.
Editors who welcome private communication typically post their preferred contact information on Misplaced Pages, sometimes enabling email through the Misplaced Pages interface. Contacting an editor using any other contact information, without first obtaining explicit permission, should be assumed to be uninvited and, depending on the context, may be harassment. Never contact another editor in this way as part of a dispute, or when the editor has asked not to be contacted that way. Unexpected contact using personal information as described above in Posting of personal information may be perceived as a threat to the safety and well-being of the person being contacted. Users who experience inappropriate off-wiki contact should report occurrences privately to the Arbitration Committee or to the emergency response team.
Harassing those outside of the editing community
ShortcutIn alignment with the protection of editors from harassment described throughout the rest of this policy, edits that harass living or recently deceased people who are not members of the Misplaced Pages community are also prohibited. Per the oversight policy, harassing content will be deleted or suppressed. Editors who post such material in any namespace may be indefinitely blocked.
Content and sourcing that comply with the biographies of living persons policy do not violate this policy; neither do discussions about sources and authors of sources, unless comments about persons are gratuitous to determining source quality. See also WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLPCOI, and the associated discretionary sanctions.
Dealing with harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:How to deal with harassment ShortcutIf you feel you are being harassed, first and foremost, act calmly (even if difficult). It is hard to overemphasize this.
If the harassment includes threats of physical harm to you or others, follow the procedures on dealing with threats of harm.
In serious cases or where privacy and off-wiki aspects are an issue (e.g., where private personal information is a part of the issue, or on-wiki issues spread to email and 'real world' harassment, or similar), you can contact the Arbitration Committee. To have personal information removed from page histories contact the oversight team.
For simpler, on-wiki matters, such as a user with whom you have arguments, see dispute resolution as the usual first step. It makes it easier to identify the problem you are having if there are some specific diffs. For more serious cases where you are willing to address it on-wiki, you may request administrative assistance. (Do not open a discussion about outing on behalf of a third party without the victim's permission, unless the relevant page revisions have already been oversighted. It is important not to make violations of privacy more severe.)
Note: If other editors have concerns over your editing, then you will quite likely gain attention from administrators and other concerned users as a result. Any civil and appropriate comments addressed by them to you would not be considered harassment.
Accusing others of harassment
ShortcutMaking accusations of harassment can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a personal attack if harassment is alleged without clear evidence that the others' action is actually harassment, and unfounded accusations may constitute harassment themselves if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of harassment on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle. At the same time, claims of harassment should be taken seriously and not be summarily dismissed unless it becomes clear the accusations are not well-founded.
Assistance for administrators being harassed
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Admins willing to make difficult blocksMisplaced Pages administrators' actions can bring them into direct conflict with difficult users and at times they too are harassed. Typically this happens when an administrator decides to intervene in a dispute with a view to warning or blocking disruptive parties or preventing their continual troublesome behavior.
Administrators are volunteer editors like any other user. They are not obligated any more than any other user to take any specific action beyond expected good conduct and responsiveness, and they are not required or expected to place themselves in an uncomfortable situation, to undertake actions which will diminish their enjoyment of working on Misplaced Pages or place themselves at risk in any way. Administrators who feel that they may have such a situation are advised to seek advice, discuss privately with other administrators, or pass the matter to another administrator willing to make difficult blocks.
Administrators who are confident they are safe from harassment, or willing to address difficult users and their potential actions, may wish to list themselves on the above page, and add the userbox template {{User difficultblocks}} to their user page, which also adds the user to Category:Misplaced Pages administrators willing to make difficult blocks
This administrator can and will make difficult blocks if needed. |
- Or use: ]
In case of problems, administrators have exactly the same right as any other user to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to contact the Arbitration Committee if needed.
Reactions to harassment
Some people may find it hard to remain calm and to react constructively in the face of real or perceived harassment. It is important that any allegations of misconduct about someone who is being harassed be considered in this context. Suffering real or perceived harassment does not justify an editor's misconduct, but a more cautious approach to sanctions in such situations is preferred.
Consequences of harassment
Although editors are encouraged to ignore or respond politely to isolated incidents, that should not imply that they are acceptable or without consequences. A pattern of hostility reduces the likelihood of the community assuming good faith, and can be considered disruptive editing. Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by harassment and/or personal attacks are likely to become involved in the dispute resolution process, and may face serious consequences such as blocks, arbitration, or being subjected to a community ban. Harassment negatively affects editor retention.
Blocking for harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks § Consequences of personal attacks- In extreme cases, such as legal threats, threats of violence, or outing, protective blocks may be employed without prior warnings.
- Incidents of wikihounding generally receive a warning. If wikihounding persists after a warning, escalating blocks are often used, beginning with 24 hours.
What harassment is not
Shortcut
This policy is aimed to protect victims of genuine harassment which is meant to cause distress to the user, such as repeated and unwanted correspondence or postings. Like the word stalk, harass carries real-life connotations – from simple unseemly behavior to criminal conduct – and must be used judiciously and with respect to these connotations.
However, some editors seem to give "harassment" a much broader, and inappropriate, meaning encompassing normal and appropriate editing practices such as merely editing the same page as another user, or warning another user for disruption or incivility. Such activities are not harassment if done civilly and in good faith.
It is also not harassment to track a user's contributions for policy violations (see above); that is part of what editor contribution histories are for. Editors do not own article content, or their own edits, and any other editor has the right to revert edits as appropriate. Unwarranted resistance to such efforts may be a sign of ownership behavior and lead to sanctions.
Unfounded accusations of harassment are a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly.
See also
- Misplaced Pages:Wikibullying
- Misplaced Pages:How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages, a page that provides a list of items to help prevent being outed.
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Personal attacks
- Misplaced Pages:Casting aspersions – accusing others of misbehavior without evidence.
- Misplaced Pages:WikiLawyering
- Wikimedia:Non-discrimination policy
- WMF Community health initiative, an anti-harassment project underway starting in 2017
- meta:Research:Harassment survey 2015
- Misplaced Pages:Ragpicking
Notes
- ^ The definition of "on Misplaced Pages" has previously been the subject of dispute. A September 2019 RfC clarified that even if a user voluntarily posts their own personal information on a Wikimedia project that is not the English Misplaced Pages, it may still be outing under certain circumstances to re-post that information on the English Misplaced Pages.
- It is generally more acceptable to reference information voluntarily disclosed only on another Wikimedia project if it is clear the user does not mind wider dissemination (e.g. posted on a user's public userpage at another Wikimedia wiki) and less acceptable if it requires much "research" to find (particularly information later removed by the user in question).
- Editors are urged to take care to err on the side of privacy, and to ask users before posting their personal information if there is any doubt. Posting information which might not constitute outing per se can still be unwise and reflect poorly on the poster's judgment.
- See Konieczny, Piotr (2018), Volunteer Retention, Burnout and Dropout in Online Voluntary Organizations: Stress, Conflict and Retirement of Wikipedians, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 42, Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 199–219, doi:10.1108/s0163-786x20180000042008, ISBN 978-1-78756-895-2, S2CID 155122668
Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content (?) |
| ||||||||||
Conduct (?) |
| ||||||||||
Deletion (?) |
| ||||||||||
Enforcement (?) |
| ||||||||||
Editing (?) |
| ||||||||||
Project content (?) |
| ||||||||||
WMF (?) |
| ||||||||||
Misplaced Pages essays (?) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus. | Shortcuts |
This page in a nutshell: Do not stop other editors from enjoying Misplaced Pages by making threats, repeated annoying and unwanted contacts, repeated personal attacks, intimidation, or posting personal information. |
If you are a user who is being harassed, see § Dealing with harassment. |
Conduct policies |
---|
Harassment is a pattern of repeated offensive behavior that appears to a reasonable observer to intentionally target a specific person or persons. Usually, the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Misplaced Pages unpleasant for the target, to undermine, frighten, or discourage them from editing.
Misplaced Pages must never be misused to harass anyone, whether or not the subject of the harassment is an editor here. Edits constituting harassment will be reverted, deleted, or suppressed, as appropriate, and editors who engage in harassment are subject to blocking and banning.
Harassment can include actions calculated to be noticed by the target and clearly suggestive of targeting them, even when no direct communication takes place.
Types of harassment and disruption
See also: Misplaced Pages:Civility § Identifying incivility, and Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks
Harassment, including threats, intimidation, repeated annoying and unwanted contact or attention, and repeated personal attacks may reduce an editor's enjoyment of Misplaced Pages and thus cause disruption to the project. Harassment of an editor on the basis of race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religious or political beliefs, disability, ethnicity, nationality, etc. is not allowed.
The prohibition against harassment applies equally to all Wikipedians. It is as unacceptable to harass a user with a history of inept or disruptive behavior as it is to harass any other user. Misplaced Pages encourages a civil community: people make mistakes, but they are encouraged to learn from them and change their ways. Harassment is contrary to this spirit and damaging to the work of building an encyclopedia.
Hounding
ShortcutsHounding on Misplaced Pages (or "wikihounding") is the singling out of one or more editors, joining discussions on multiple pages or topics they may edit or multiple debates where they contribute, to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work. This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Misplaced Pages.
Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam. The contribution logs can be used in the dispute resolution process to gather evidence to be presented in incidents and arbitration cases. Using dispute resolution can itself constitute hounding if it involves persistently making frivolous or meritless complaints about another editor.
The important component of hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason. Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions.
Threats
Threatening another person is considered harassment. This includes any real-world threats, such as threats of harm, and threats to disrupt a person's work on Misplaced Pages. Statements of intent to properly use normal Misplaced Pages processes, such as dispute resolution, are not threats. Legal threats are a special case of threat, with their own settled policy. Users who make legal threats will typically be blocked from editing indefinitely.
Perceived legal threats
Main page: Misplaced Pages:No legal threats ShortcutMisplaced Pages has a policy of blocking users who post legal threats on Misplaced Pages against other editors. It is important not to post comments that others may reasonably interpret as a legal threat; words such as libelous or defamatory are best avoided for that reason. In handling apparent legal threats, users should seek to clarify the poster's intention, explain the policy, and ask them to remove the threat. That users are involved in a legal dispute with each other is not a reason to block, so long as no legal threats are posted on Misplaced Pages.
Posting of personal information
Shortcuts "WP:PRIVACY" redirects here. For the Wikimedia privacy policy, see Wikimedia:Privacy policy. See also: Doxing, Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outing, and Arbitration Committee response to the Wikimedia Foundation statement on paid editing and outingPosting another editor's personal information is harassment, unless that person has voluntarily posted their own information, or links to such information, on Misplaced Pages. Personal information includes an editor's real-life name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, personal profiles on external sites, other contact information, or photograph, whether such information is accurate or not. Posting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of privacy and may place that editor at risk of harm outside their activities on Misplaced Pages. Unless unintentional and non-malicious (for example, where Wikipedians know each other off-site and may inadvertently post personal information, such as using the other person's real name in discussions), attempted outing is sufficient grounds for an immediate block. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors.
How to deal with personal information
If you have accidentally posted anything that might lead to you being outed (including but not limited to inadvertently editing while logged out, which reveals your IP address, and thus, your approximate location), it is important that you act promptly to have the edit(s) oversighted. Do not otherwise draw attention to the information. Referring to still-existing, self-disclosed posted information is not considered outing, and so the failure of an editor to have the information redacted in a timely manner may remove it from protection by this policy. Further information about protecting private information is at Personal security practices, On privacy, and How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages.
Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for oversight to delete that edit from Misplaced Pages. Any administrator may redact it pending oversight, even when the administrator is involved. If an editor has previously posted their own personal information but later redacted it, it should not be repeated on Misplaced Pages, although references to still-existing, self-disclosed information are not considered outing. If the previously posted information has been removed by oversight, then repeating it on Misplaced Pages is considered outing.
If you see an editor post personal information about another person, do not confirm or deny the accuracy of the information. Doing so would give the person posting the information, and anyone else who saw the page, feedback on the accuracy of the material. For the same reason, do not treat incorrect attempts at outing any differently from correct attempts. When reporting an attempted outing take care not to comment on the accuracy of the information. Outing should usually be described as "an attempted outing" or similar, to make it clear that the information may or may not be true, and it should be made clear to the users blocked for outing that the block log and notice does not confirm the information.
The fact that an editor has posted personal information or edits under their own name, making them easily identifiable through online searches, is not an excuse to post the results of "opposition research". Dredging up their off-site opinions to repeatedly challenge their edits can be a form of harassment, just as doing so regarding their past edits on other Misplaced Pages articles may be. Threats to out an editor will be treated as a personal attack and are prohibited.
Exceptions
Nothing in this policy prohibits the emailing of personal information about editors to individual administrators, functionaries, or arbitrators, or to the Wikimedia Foundation, when doing so is necessary to report violations of confidentiality-sensitive policies (such as conflict of interest or paid editing, harassment, or violations of the child-protection policy). Only the minimum information necessary should be conveyed and the minimum number of people contacted. Editors are warned, however, that the community has rejected the idea that editors should "investigate" each other. Posting such information on Misplaced Pages violates this policy.
Posting links to other accounts on other websites is allowable in specific situations (but see also Misplaced Pages:Linking to external harassment):
- There are job posting sites where employers publicly post advertisements to recruit paid Misplaced Pages editors. Linking to such an ad in a forum such as the Conflict of interest noticeboard is not a violation of this policy.
- If individuals have identified themselves without redacting or having it oversighted, such information can be used for discussions of conflict of interest (COI) in appropriate forums.
- If redacted or oversighted personally identifying material is important to the COI discussion, then it should be emailed privately to an administrator or arbitrator—but not repeated on Misplaced Pages: it will be sufficient to say that the editor in question has a COI and the information has been emailed to the appropriate administrative authority.
- To combat impersonation (an editor claiming falsely to be a particular person), it is permissible to post or link to disavowals from that person, provided that the person has explicitly and in good faith given their consent, and provided that there is a high degree of confidence in the authenticity of the source.
Issues involving private personal information (of anyone) could also be referred by email to a member of the functionaries team. While in the limited circumstances outlined above, links to external websites containing solicitations to edit Misplaced Pages may be posted on Misplaced Pages to demonstrate that there may be conflict of interest editing, links to personal profiles on external sites should not be connected to any specific Misplaced Pages editor unless that editor discloses it themselves.
Private correspondence
Shortcuts See also: Misplaced Pages:Private correspondenceThere is no community consensus regarding the posting of private off-wiki correspondence.
The Arbitration Committee has stated a principle that "In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki" and in a second principle that "Any uninvolved administrator may remove private correspondence that has been posted without the consent of any of the creators. Such material should instead be sent directly to the Committee."
User space harassment
Shortcut See also: Misplaced Pages:Don't restore removed commentsA common problem is harassment in userspace. Examples include placing numerous false or questionable "warnings" on a user's talk page, restoring such comments after a user has removed them, placing "suspected sockpuppet" and similar tags on the user page of active contributors, and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space.
User pages are provided so that editors can provide some general information about themselves and user talk pages are to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues. Any sort of content which truly needs to be displayed, or removed, should be immediately brought to the attention of admins rather than edit warring to enforce your views on the content of someone else's user space.
Off-wiki harassment
Shortcut See also: Linking to external harassment and Misplaced Pages is not compulsoryInappropriate or unwanted public or private communication, following, or any form of hounding, when directed at another editor, violates the harassment policy. Off-wiki harassment, including through the use of external links, will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases. In some cases, evidence should be submitted by private email. As is the case with on-wiki harassment, off-wiki harassment can be grounds for blocking, and in extreme cases, banning.
Editors who welcome private communication typically post their preferred contact information on Misplaced Pages, sometimes enabling email through the Misplaced Pages interface. Contacting an editor using any other contact information, without first obtaining explicit permission, should be assumed to be uninvited and, depending on the context, may be harassment. Never contact another editor in this way as part of a dispute, or when the editor has asked not to be contacted that way. Unexpected contact using personal information as described above in Posting of personal information may be perceived as a threat to the safety and well-being of the person being contacted. Users who experience inappropriate off-wiki contact should report occurrences privately to the Arbitration Committee or to the emergency response team.
Harassing those outside of the editing community
ShortcutIn alignment with the protection of editors from harassment described throughout the rest of this policy, edits that harass living or recently deceased people who are not members of the Misplaced Pages community are also prohibited. Per the oversight policy, harassing content will be deleted or suppressed. Editors who post such material in any namespace may be indefinitely blocked.
Content and sourcing that comply with the biographies of living persons policy do not violate this policy; neither do discussions about sources and authors of sources, unless comments about persons are gratuitous to determining source quality. See also WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLPCOI, and the associated discretionary sanctions.
Dealing with harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:How to deal with harassment ShortcutIf you feel you are being harassed, first and foremost, act calmly (even if difficult). It is hard to overemphasize this.
If the harassment includes threats of physical harm to you or others, follow the procedures on dealing with threats of harm.
In serious cases or where privacy and off-wiki aspects are an issue (e.g., where private personal information is a part of the issue, or on-wiki issues spread to email and 'real world' harassment, or similar), you can contact the Arbitration Committee. To have personal information removed from page histories contact the oversight team.
For simpler, on-wiki matters, such as a user with whom you have arguments, see dispute resolution as the usual first step. It makes it easier to identify the problem you are having if there are some specific diffs. For more serious cases where you are willing to address it on-wiki, you may request administrative assistance. (Do not open a discussion about outing on behalf of a third party without the victim's permission, unless the relevant page revisions have already been oversighted. It is important not to make violations of privacy more severe.)
Note: If other editors have concerns over your editing, then you will quite likely gain attention from administrators and other concerned users as a result. Any civil and appropriate comments addressed by them to you would not be considered harassment.
Accusing others of harassment
ShortcutMaking accusations of harassment can be inflammatory and hence these accusations may not be helpful in a dispute. It can be seen as a personal attack if harassment is alleged without clear evidence that the others' action is actually harassment, and unfounded accusations may constitute harassment themselves if done repeatedly. The result is often accusations of harassment on your part, which tends to create a nasty cycle. At the same time, claims of harassment should be taken seriously and not be summarily dismissed unless it becomes clear the accusations are not well-founded.
Assistance for administrators being harassed
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Admins willing to make difficult blocksMisplaced Pages administrators' actions can bring them into direct conflict with difficult users and at times they too are harassed. Typically this happens when an administrator decides to intervene in a dispute with a view to warning or blocking disruptive parties or preventing their continual troublesome behavior.
Administrators are volunteer editors like any other user. They are not obligated any more than any other user to take any specific action beyond expected good conduct and responsiveness, and they are not required or expected to place themselves in an uncomfortable situation, to undertake actions which will diminish their enjoyment of working on Misplaced Pages or place themselves at risk in any way. Administrators who feel that they may have such a situation are advised to seek advice, discuss privately with other administrators, or pass the matter to another administrator willing to make difficult blocks.
Administrators who are confident they are safe from harassment, or willing to address difficult users and their potential actions, may wish to list themselves on the above page, and add the userbox template {{User difficultblocks}} to their user page, which also adds the user to Category:Misplaced Pages administrators willing to make difficult blocks
This administrator can and will make difficult blocks if needed. |
- Or use: ]
In case of problems, administrators have exactly the same right as any other user to decline or withdraw from a situation that is escalating or uncomfortable, without giving a reason, or to contact the Arbitration Committee if needed.
Reactions to harassment
Some people may find it hard to remain calm and to react constructively in the face of real or perceived harassment. It is important that any allegations of misconduct about someone who is being harassed be considered in this context. Suffering real or perceived harassment does not justify an editor's misconduct, but a more cautious approach to sanctions in such situations is preferred.
Consequences of harassment
Although editors are encouraged to ignore or respond politely to isolated incidents, that should not imply that they are acceptable or without consequences. A pattern of hostility reduces the likelihood of the community assuming good faith, and can be considered disruptive editing. Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by harassment and/or personal attacks are likely to become involved in the dispute resolution process, and may face serious consequences such as blocks, arbitration, or being subjected to a community ban. Harassment negatively affects editor retention.
Blocking for harassment
See also: Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks § Consequences of personal attacks- In extreme cases, such as legal threats, threats of violence, or outing, protective blocks may be employed without prior warnings.
- Incidents of wikihounding generally receive a warning. If wikihounding persists after a warning, escalating blocks are often used, beginning with 24 hours.
What harassment is not
Shortcut
This policy is aimed to protect victims of genuine harassment which is meant to cause distress to the user, such as repeated and unwanted correspondence or postings. Like the word stalk, harass carries real-life connotations – from simple unseemly behavior to criminal conduct – and must be used judiciously and with respect to these connotations.
However, some editors seem to give "harassment" a much broader, and inappropriate, meaning encompassing normal and appropriate editing practices such as merely editing the same page as another user, or warning another user for disruption or incivility. Such activities are not harassment if done civilly and in good faith.
It is also not harassment to track a user's contributions for policy violations (see above); that is part of what editor contribution histories are for. Editors do not own article content, or their own edits, and any other editor has the right to revert edits as appropriate. Unwarranted resistance to such efforts may be a sign of ownership behavior and lead to sanctions.
Unfounded accusations of harassment are a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly.
See also
- Misplaced Pages:Wikibullying
- Misplaced Pages:How to not get outed on Misplaced Pages, a page that provides a list of items to help prevent being outed.
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Personal attacks
- Misplaced Pages:Casting aspersions – accusing others of misbehavior without evidence.
- Misplaced Pages:WikiLawyering
- Wikimedia:Non-discrimination policy
- WMF Community health initiative, an anti-harassment project underway starting in 2017
- meta:Research:Harassment survey 2015
- Misplaced Pages:Ragpicking
Notes
- ^ The definition of "on Misplaced Pages" has previously been the subject of dispute. A September 2019 RfC clarified that even if a user voluntarily posts their own personal information on a Wikimedia project that is not the English Misplaced Pages, it may still be outing under certain circumstances to re-post that information on the English Misplaced Pages.
- It is generally more acceptable to reference information voluntarily disclosed only on another Wikimedia project if it is clear the user does not mind wider dissemination (e.g. posted on a user's public userpage at another Wikimedia wiki) and less acceptable if it requires much "research" to find (particularly information later removed by the user in question).
- Editors are urged to take care to err on the side of privacy, and to ask users before posting their personal information if there is any doubt. Posting information which might not constitute outing per se can still be unwise and reflect poorly on the poster's judgment.
- See Konieczny, Piotr (2018), Volunteer Retention, Burnout and Dropout in Online Voluntary Organizations: Stress, Conflict and Retirement of Wikipedians, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 42, Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 199–219, doi:10.1108/s0163-786x20180000042008, ISBN 978-1-78756-895-2, S2CID 155122668
Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content (?) |
| ||||||||||
Conduct (?) |
| ||||||||||
Deletion (?) |
| ||||||||||
Enforcement (?) |
| ||||||||||
Editing (?) |
| ||||||||||
Project content (?) |
| ||||||||||
WMF (?) |
| ||||||||||
Misplaced Pages essays (?) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
i blocked you due to
- persistent personal attacks
- actions placing users in danger
- hounding
- harassment
- threatening
- apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor
- disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or disruption to the project generally, for no overridingly constructive reason