| Revision as of 11:52, 4 July 2020 editEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,806 edits →July 2020: {{subst:uw-npov4}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:54, 4 July 2020 edit undoObjective3000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,037 edits →Discretionary sanctions alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> ] 11:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> ] 11:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == Discretionary sanctions alert == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }} ] (]) 11:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC){{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
Revision as of 11:54, 4 July 2020
September 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to White pride, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Http---orig12.deviantart.net-6d83-f-2015-232-d-a-5846661 dalton confederate flag rally video goes v by oddgarfield-d96hu6v.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Http---orig12.deviantart.net-6d83-f-2015-232-d-a-5846661 dalton confederate flag rally video goes v by oddgarfield-d96hu6v.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to White pride, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please see also the many past discussions of this issue on the article's talk page: Talk:White pride. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 07:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
White pride
Thank you for your explanation. However, I reverted an edit in which you removed a picture and caption and replaced the picture and caption with a red link. I reverted the edit as an unexplained removal of content. That is exactly what it was. It seems that you intended to substitute one picture for another. But that was not the result of your edit. This is a different issue from the one addressed in your explanation. That issue pertains to later edits by you which were reverted by other users. Since these edits not only followed mine but had to do with the text not just a failed picture substitution, any controversy over those changes would be between you and the other users. My revert of your edit concerning the problem with the picture substitution was proper and had nothing to do with the content of the article or later edits. So you need to take up the issue with the other users. In the event this does not work out to your satisfaction, I suggest you look at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution. Donner60 (talk) 01:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Nazism
Please stop adding variations on the "Nazism is really leftism" theme to the page. You're being reverted by multiple other editors. As a fairly new account, it's not a good idea to dive into controversial pages and make edits that give too much prominence to marginal or fringe viewpoints. As noted, they won't stay, so you'll have wasted your time, and your account is likely to end up blocked if you don't back off. Please use the talk page to explain what you want to do and why, although be warned that patience tends to wear thin there too, as this is a regular talk-point there. N-HH talk/edits 15:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
July 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 11:48, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. El_C 11:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.