Revision as of 01:18, 27 December 2006 edit71.111.81.43 (talk) Undo revision 96649110 by Kicking222 (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:18, 27 December 2006 edit undo71.111.81.43 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
'''del''' A decent man, but seems to fail ] (even forgetting that it is unreferenced) `'] 01:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | '''del''' A decent man, but seems to fail ] (even forgetting that it is unreferenced) `'] 01:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
I do not agree, he is a well known person in Oregon | I do not agree, he is a well known person in Oregon and think he should remain |
Revision as of 01:18, 27 December 2006
Les Balsiger
del A decent man, but seems to fail notability criteria (even forgetting that it is unreferenced) `'mikka 01:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC) I do not agree, he is a well known person in Oregon and think he should remain