| Revision as of 00:55, 12 July 2020 editNeutrality (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,431 edits +← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:10, 12 July 2020 edit undoPatiodweller (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,048 edits KEEPNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Is there an argument for deletion? I don't see one. City-wide police work stoppages are rare and notable, particularly as a coordinated reaction to a police killing. The article is underdeveloped but deserves to stay. --] (]) 00:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Is there an argument for deletion? I don't see one. City-wide police work stoppages are rare and notable, particularly as a coordinated reaction to a police killing. The article is underdeveloped but deserves to stay. --] (]) 00:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
| ::* The argument is that it is not independently notable outside the context of the Rayshard Brooks killing, and can be addressed sufficiently in the context of that article, without a standalone article. ]<sup>]</sup> 00:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC) | ::* The argument is that it is not independently notable outside the context of the Rayshard Brooks killing, and can be addressed sufficiently in the context of that article, without a standalone article. ]<sup>]</sup> 00:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - It's a recent event of course, but it is the subject of considerable major media coverage, as is clear from the many sources cited, so I wouldn't be surprised if it achieved long-term attention. We have fulfilled ] already, so at least for now we ought to keep it. ] (]) 01:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:10, 12 July 2020
2020 Atlanta police sickout
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- 2020 Atlanta police sickout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The content in this article can (and has) been easily summarized in three or four sentences at Killing of Rayshard Brooks. It is not necessary to have a separate article, and WP:NOTNEWS implications are present. I redirected the article to Killing of Rayshard Brooks; that was reverted, so I am bringing the article here. Neutrality 21:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC) Tagging @EEng: since he first had the idea.
- Redirect to Killing of Rayshard Brooks (as nom); delete as second choice. Neutrality 21:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Is there an argument for deletion? I don't see one. City-wide police work stoppages are rare and notable, particularly as a coordinated reaction to a police killing. The article is underdeveloped but deserves to stay. --Lockley (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- The argument is that it is not independently notable outside the context of the Rayshard Brooks killing, and can be addressed sufficiently in the context of that article, without a standalone article. Neutrality 00:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - It's a recent event of course, but it is the subject of considerable major media coverage, as is clear from the many sources cited, so I wouldn't be surprised if it achieved long-term attention. We have fulfilled WP:SIGCOV already, so at least for now we ought to keep it. Patiodweller (talk) 01:09, 12 July 2020 (UTC)