Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rascalpatrol: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:38, 28 December 2006 editRascalpatrol (talk | contribs)40 edits I now you've been told this before← Previous edit Revision as of 19:22, 28 December 2006 edit undoSkookum1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled89,945 edits second restoration of material deleted by rascalpatrol; DELETION IS VANDALISM even on your own talk page; this is not a Liberal Party blog where things can be cesnored because you don't like themNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
To our little vandal friend. Thou protest too much. (okay -- not my posts originally, but I like them) To our little vandal friend. Thou protest too much. (okay -- not my posts originally, but I like them)
Rascalpatrol Rascalpatrol

==Restoration of deleted post==

I'm not little, rascalpatrol.....

You are not an admin, and not even admins delete talkpage postings made by other editors. You are not a censor, though you are behaving one, and interpreting Wiki rules to suit yourself. The questions you deleted, and comments such as those I made, are not placed on the article page, but on the Talk page, as part of the discussion; rules for article content do NOT apply to talk page content. I reviewed your various edits and mutliple/repeated deletions/vandalisms in detail last night (nice thing about edit histories) and am going to seek to have you blocked for your deletions and vandalism, both in the article and in the talk page. If you're Erik Bornmann, you've seriously violated the "do not edit articles about yourself" guideline, also (your username may hide your IP address from the rest of us; it doesn't hide it from admins, and IPs can be traced down to individual desktops/networks; give your head a shake - if you are Bornmann, or one of his pals, then systematically vandalizing Misplaced Pages isa great way to get an article written on your attempts to silence criticism of your up-and-coming legal/political career. I leave it to you to restore my post, which you had no business in deleting. Would have been so much better if you'd had the ''cojones'' to respond. But like so many other political animals in this country, it's not about honesty, it's about covering things up, whatever the "things" are. If you don't like critical comments, you shouldn't be in politics. If you're not Erik Bornmann (but obviously have links to him) the existence of an information-suppression campaign in Misplaced Pages is being documented every time you make an edit/deletion/post, and by the look of all the shenanigans going on in the Ledgegate-related pages this is going to make a real nice article, which should reach print just as the Basi-Virk trials come underway and Bornmann is called to the stand. I'm not a journalist (have lots of friends who are, though) but seeing behaviour like yours really makes me wonder if it's necessary to take up the cause; since p.r. consultants and communications consultants are in the business of massaging truth into something else, while politicians are not in the business of truth ''at all''. Not that journalists are, necessarily (cf. Gary Mason's puffpiece on Basi in the ''Globe'').] 19:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC) I can see the headline now: "Bornmann blocked from Misplaced Pages for vandalism; efforts to censor truth about career kiboshed by Wiki admins". Oh, hell, I'm sure the ''Province'' will come up with something a lot pithier/catchier. I'm sure it'll be a feather in your political cap, if that's who you turn out to be....] 19:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

:And by the look of Gardiner's comment above, it appears that you, Rascalpatrol, ARE in fact Erik Bornmann. So I suggest you use your Wiki-edit tools a little more carefully now. Misplaced Pages is a very big sandbox and while you and your pals can invoke legalities as a form of libel chill, all that does to the casual observer (and I'm actually non-partisan in this) is offend them, and make them think "where there's smoke there's fire". If you're innocent of wrongdoing, then there's no need to delete well-known and well-documented facts. And rather than deleting other's questions, if you had more integrity you'd seek to answer them; you wouldn't presume to DELETE THEM. Silencing opposition is a hallmark of authoritarian states, but also of Canadian political parties and their armies of consultants; the suppression of truth in this country is increasingly nauseating, whether it's being perpetrated by Tories, Grits, the RCMP, the courts, whomever, "even the CBC". We do not live in an open society, in a real democracy, and one of the reasons why is people like you who are interested only in their own skins, and not in the public good.] 19:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

I've discussed this with a laywer friend who's been following the Ledgegate affair, and ''he'' thinks that your behaviour here on Misplaced Pages is going to be of interest to the Law Society of Upper Canada. Hiding information about yourself, etc...] 21:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
==Deleting posts==
You're hilarious; on ] you claim to not have deleted anything relevant, but here you go deleting talk-page posts, ''which are none of your business to delete''. I'm also mocking your "where do these people come from?" comment in the in-line comments. Where? From the rank-and-file of the citizenry who are tired of having p.r. hacks run this country for their own very profitable benefit and self-advancement. If you and your buddies who've been working over this page and softsoaping the Ledgegate page had made other contributions to Misplaced Pages it wouldn't seem like you were only interested in yourself (or, if you're really not Mr. Bornmann, then in him). Misplaced Pages is a neutral and meant to be impartial - you are decidedly trying to prevent it from being so by blocking widely-known news items about Mr. Bornmann, and have ''repeatedly'' deleted content in the article which was relevant, ''even though you would not like it to be''. Go head, threaten me with libel again - but I'm reporting you to admin for repeated vandalism and "proprietary" conduct over a particular article. Might just have to call Baldrey about this too...and/or Tieleman, since you seem to hate him so much....] 00:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:22, 28 December 2006

Bornmann

Sorry, I didn't realize that I was editing over you. I hope that I didn't disrupt anything. --JGGardiner 19:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

To our little vandal friend. Thou protest too much. (okay -- not my posts originally, but I like them) Rascalpatrol

Restoration of deleted post

I'm not little, rascalpatrol.....

You are not an admin, and not even admins delete talkpage postings made by other editors. You are not a censor, though you are behaving one, and interpreting Wiki rules to suit yourself. The questions you deleted, and comments such as those I made, are not placed on the article page, but on the Talk page, as part of the discussion; rules for article content do NOT apply to talk page content. I reviewed your various edits and mutliple/repeated deletions/vandalisms in detail last night (nice thing about edit histories) and am going to seek to have you blocked for your deletions and vandalism, both in the article and in the talk page. If you're Erik Bornmann, you've seriously violated the "do not edit articles about yourself" guideline, also (your username may hide your IP address from the rest of us; it doesn't hide it from admins, and IPs can be traced down to individual desktops/networks; give your head a shake - if you are Bornmann, or one of his pals, then systematically vandalizing Misplaced Pages isa great way to get an article written on your attempts to silence criticism of your up-and-coming legal/political career. I leave it to you to restore my post, which you had no business in deleting. Would have been so much better if you'd had the cojones to respond. But like so many other political animals in this country, it's not about honesty, it's about covering things up, whatever the "things" are. If you don't like critical comments, you shouldn't be in politics. If you're not Erik Bornmann (but obviously have links to him) the existence of an information-suppression campaign in Misplaced Pages is being documented every time you make an edit/deletion/post, and by the look of all the shenanigans going on in the Ledgegate-related pages this is going to make a real nice article, which should reach print just as the Basi-Virk trials come underway and Bornmann is called to the stand. I'm not a journalist (have lots of friends who are, though) but seeing behaviour like yours really makes me wonder if it's necessary to take up the cause; since p.r. consultants and communications consultants are in the business of massaging truth into something else, while politicians are not in the business of truth at all. Not that journalists are, necessarily (cf. Gary Mason's puffpiece on Basi in the Globe).Skookum1 19:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC) I can see the headline now: "Bornmann blocked from Misplaced Pages for vandalism; efforts to censor truth about career kiboshed by Wiki admins". Oh, hell, I'm sure the Province will come up with something a lot pithier/catchier. I'm sure it'll be a feather in your political cap, if that's who you turn out to be....Skookum1 19:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

And by the look of Gardiner's comment above, it appears that you, Rascalpatrol, ARE in fact Erik Bornmann. So I suggest you use your Wiki-edit tools a little more carefully now. Misplaced Pages is a very big sandbox and while you and your pals can invoke legalities as a form of libel chill, all that does to the casual observer (and I'm actually non-partisan in this) is offend them, and make them think "where there's smoke there's fire". If you're innocent of wrongdoing, then there's no need to delete well-known and well-documented facts. And rather than deleting other's questions, if you had more integrity you'd seek to answer them; you wouldn't presume to DELETE THEM. Silencing opposition is a hallmark of authoritarian states, but also of Canadian political parties and their armies of consultants; the suppression of truth in this country is increasingly nauseating, whether it's being perpetrated by Tories, Grits, the RCMP, the courts, whomever, "even the CBC". We do not live in an open society, in a real democracy, and one of the reasons why is people like you who are interested only in their own skins, and not in the public good.Skookum1 19:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

I've discussed this with a laywer friend who's been following the Ledgegate affair, and he thinks that your behaviour here on Misplaced Pages is going to be of interest to the Law Society of Upper Canada. Hiding information about yourself, etc...Skookum1 21:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Deleting posts

You're hilarious; on Talk:Erik Bornmann you claim to not have deleted anything relevant, but here you go deleting talk-page posts, which are none of your business to delete. I'm also mocking your "where do these people come from?" comment in the in-line comments. Where? From the rank-and-file of the citizenry who are tired of having p.r. hacks run this country for their own very profitable benefit and self-advancement. If you and your buddies who've been working over this page and softsoaping the Ledgegate page had made other contributions to Misplaced Pages it wouldn't seem like you were only interested in yourself (or, if you're really not Mr. Bornmann, then in him). Misplaced Pages is a neutral and meant to be impartial - you are decidedly trying to prevent it from being so by blocking widely-known news items about Mr. Bornmann, and have repeatedly deleted content in the article which was relevant, even though you would not like it to be. Go head, threaten me with libel again - but I'm reporting you to admin for repeated vandalism and "proprietary" conduct over a particular article. Might just have to call Baldrey about this too...and/or Tieleman, since you seem to hate him so much....Skookum1 00:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Rascalpatrol: Difference between revisions Add topic