Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Library damage resulting from the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:34, 29 December 2006 edit17Drew (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users22,531 edits →[]: keep← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:04, 29 December 2006 edit undoSkier Dude (talk \| contribs)315,466 edits categoryNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===]===		===]===
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|~~{{{cat}}}~~}}		{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|S}}
	:{{la\|Library damage resulting from the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake}} <includeonly> — (])</includeonly>		:{{la\|Library damage resulting from the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake}} <includeonly> — (])</includeonly>
	Mainly to see what people here think and because Misplaced Pages is ], but see further comments below. ] 00:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)		Mainly to see what people here think and because Misplaced Pages is ], but see further comments below. ] 00:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:04, 29 December 2006

Mainly to see what people here think and because Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information, but see further comments below. Carcharoth 00:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment - I'm nominating this to generate further discussion, as I feel that the article in its present form violates the concept that Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There is some notable stuff in here, but after the non-notable stuff has been weeded out, what is left could be put somewhere like 2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake#Other_effects, or a new section created on the cultural impact of the disaster. Carcharoth 00:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Article history - I have notified the creator here. Please also note the creator's contributions (from 2-6 November 2006: a draft of this article, a US Department of Defense photo, and moving the draft article into the main article space and a few more edits there). The draft article is at User:Elesemichelle/New sub page. Carcharoth 00:39, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep I wouldn't consider this indiscriminate, though I think it might be good to add a section in the opening that establishes the significance of the article. —ShadowHalo 01:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)