Misplaced Pages

Datapackets: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:03, 28 January 2005 editAgquarx (talk | contribs)190 editsm ...got a reverse of a 'writers block', this is VERY much work in progress, enter at your own risk...← Previous edit Revision as of 07:06, 28 January 2005 edit undoAgquarx (talk | contribs)190 editsm ...got a reverse of a 'writers block', this is VERY much work in progress, enter at your own risk...Next edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
---- ----


* BEWARE! EVERYTHING BELOW IS DEFINED '''FORWARDTHINKING''', fowardthinking is the "natural" way of perceiving events, that is - I choose this(these) event(s) look(s) like C.A.U.S.E., AFTER { this } FORWARD I choose that(these) event(s) which(whom) look(s) like E.F.F.E.C.T. I think it is self-explanatory what BACKWARDTHINKING means. IF you backwardthink you get an answer before you ask the question, you get a meaning of a symbol before the symbol is presented to your sensory inputs, you get an "effect" before you volition (wilIt, grok, observe) a "cause". It does NOT mean going forward or backward IN time, the difference is in perception, not flow of time, because there is NO FLOW OF TIME, all the events ARE simultaneously. There is no past, now, future. What is I call the EVERNOW. The "flow of time is an attribute of our Self, a feeling, just like self-awareness, dreaming, being awake - a STATE of the mind (I SELF or ISelf or {@}). ] 07:03, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) * BEWARE! EVERYTHING BELOW IS DEFINED '''FORWARDTHINKING''', fowardthinking is the "natural" way of perceiving events, that is - I choose this(these) event(s) look(s) like C.A.U.S.E., AFTER { this } FORWARD I choose that(these) event(s) which(whom) look(s) like E.F.F.E.C.T. I think it is self-explanatory what BACKWARDTHINKING means. IF you backwardthink you get an answer before you ask the question, you get a meaning of a symbol before the symbol is presented to your sensory inputs, you get an "effect" before you volition (wilIt, grok, observe) a "cause". It does NOT mean going forward or backward IN time, the difference is in perception, not flow of time, because there is NO FLOW OF TIME, all the events ARE simultaneously. There is no past, now, future. What is I call the EVERNOW. The "flow of time is an attribute of our Self, a feeling, just like self-awareness, dreaming, being awake - a STATE of the mind (I SELF or ISelf or {@}). ] 07:06, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)


---- ----
Line 13: Line 13:


** FOR BRAVE SOULS - Try watching your fauvorite movie backwardthinking, choose one you are sure to grok in it's fullness, know inside-out, can quote most of dialogues etc, You might archieve surprising insight into deeper structures and or meanings of the things, persons, events, symbols contained in the narrative of the movie you thought you've SEEN before. ** FOR BRAVE SOULS - Try watching your fauvorite movie backwardthinking, choose one you are sure to grok in it's fullness, know inside-out, can quote most of dialogues etc, You might archieve surprising insight into deeper structures and or meanings of the things, persons, events, symbols contained in the narrative of the movie you thought you've SEEN before.
Backwardthinking needs a little training (some say it is extremely difficult, some say it's only hard at the beginning) OR an entheogen, the preferred way In My Opinion (my research tells me that what you are looking for is called ], it's a one of the ] (from the same family as PEA, the phenetylamine of love), was synthetised by a one of the greates living scientists on Earth, professor ], up to now ] 07:03, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) I have see no reports whatsoever of anything indicating health risk and as it is avaliable relatively easy on the market for several years since it was discovered by merchants of the Dark Side, I think that although it is a design drug, not tested clinically and '''ILLEGAL''' (Unkle Sam says you can't take it out of your free will and with full knowledge of possible consequences. How can One argue with Unkle Sam?), I can refer to it with a clear conscience, I MySelf took it several times, in doses from 25 to 50 milligram of chemically pure substance (typical dose is betwen 15 and 20 milligram, but see, I am hardcore junkie and crazy as a Cheshire Cat :8)). I bought 300 mg of it back then, before it was put on a Controlled Substances List (Like always, for no real reason, don't we just LOVE how our goverments CARE for our health SO MUCH? I guess our bodies are a government property and we are forbidden to decide, gee, they STILL let us to vote them in, that is SO exciting! Sieg Heil Bush!), from a legal, professional chemical laboratory, through the Internet, I have no idea what you might get "on the street" - remember, KNOW YOUR SOURCE, don't buy stuff from the people you do not know, every white powder looks alike another - if you have access to certain marker potions you can "become a chymist" and CHECK what substance you are going to ingest. More information, for the curious, for the not-so-brave and for the Law Abiding Citizens on . ] 07:03, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) Backwardthinking needs a little training (some say it is extremely difficult, some say it's only hard at the beginning) OR an ] ("the one that divinates the Self" OR ], the preferred way In My Opinion (my research tells me that what you are looking for is called ], it's a ] (from the same family as PEA, the phenetylamine of love), was synthetised by a one of the greates living scientists on Earth, professor ], up to now ] 07:06, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) I have see no reports whatsoever of anything indicating health risk and as it is avaliable relatively easy on the market for several years since it was discovered by merchants of the Dark Side, I think that although it is a design drug, not tested clinically and '''ILLEGAL''' (Unkle Sam says you can't take it out of your free will and with full knowledge of possible consequences. How can One argue with Unkle Sam?), I can refer to it with a clear conscience, I MySelf took it several times, in doses from 25 to 50 milligram of chemically pure substance (typical dose is betwen 15 and 20 milligram, but see, I am hardcore junkie and crazy as a Cheshire Cat :8)). I bought 300 mg of it back then, before it was put on a Controlled Substances List (Like always, for no real reason, don't we just LOVE how our goverments CARE for our health SO MUCH? I guess our bodies are a government property and we are forbidden to decide, gee, they STILL let us to vote them in, that is SO exciting! Sieg Heil Bush!), from a legal, professional chemical laboratory, through the Internet, I have no idea what you might get "on the street" - remember, KNOW YOUR SOURCE, don't buy stuff from the people you do not know, every white powder looks alike another - if you have access to certain marker potions you can "become a chymist" and CHECK what substance you are going to ingest. More information, for the curious, for the not-so-brave and for the Law Abiding Citizens on . ] 07:06, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)


---- ----

Revision as of 07:06, 28 January 2005

You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.

page is in the middle of an expansion or major revampingThis article or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template.
If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use. This redirect was last edited by Agquarx (talk | contribs) 19 years ago. (Update timer)

TEASER


  • BEWARE! EVERYTHING BELOW IS DEFINED FORWARDTHINKING, fowardthinking is the "natural" way of perceiving events, that is - I choose this(these) event(s) look(s) like C.A.U.S.E., AFTER { this } FORWARD I choose that(these) event(s) which(whom) look(s) like E.F.F.E.C.T. I think it is self-explanatory what BACKWARDTHINKING means. IF you backwardthink you get an answer before you ask the question, you get a meaning of a symbol before the symbol is presented to your sensory inputs, you get an "effect" before you volition (wilIt, grok, observe) a "cause". It does NOT mean going forward or backward IN time, the difference is in perception, not flow of time, because there is NO FLOW OF TIME, all the events ARE simultaneously. There is no past, now, future. What is I call the EVERNOW. The "flow of time is an attribute of our Self, a feeling, just like self-awareness, dreaming, being awake - a STATE of the mind (I SELF or ISelf or {@}). Agquarx 07:06, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

TRAILER


    • FOR BRAVE SOULS - Try watching your fauvorite movie backwardthinking, choose one you are sure to grok in it's fullness, know inside-out, can quote most of dialogues etc, You might archieve surprising insight into deeper structures and or meanings of the things, persons, events, symbols contained in the narrative of the movie you thought you've SEEN before.

Backwardthinking needs a little training (some say it is extremely difficult, some say it's only hard at the beginning) OR an entheogen ("the one that divinates the Self" OR psychoactive drug, the preferred way In My Opinion (my research tells me that what you are looking for is called 2C-I, it's a Phenethylamine (from the same family as PEA, the phenetylamine of love), was synthetised by a one of the greates living scientists on Earth, professor Alexander Shulgin, up to now Agquarx 07:06, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) I have see no reports whatsoever of anything indicating health risk and as it is avaliable relatively easy on the market for several years since it was discovered by merchants of the Dark Side, I think that although it is a design drug, not tested clinically and ILLEGAL (Unkle Sam says you can't take it out of your free will and with full knowledge of possible consequences. How can One argue with Unkle Sam?), I can refer to it with a clear conscience, I MySelf took it several times, in doses from 25 to 50 milligram of chemically pure substance (typical dose is betwen 15 and 20 milligram, but see, I am hardcore junkie and crazy as a Cheshire Cat :8)). I bought 300 mg of it back then, before it was put on a Controlled Substances List (Like always, for no real reason, don't we just LOVE how our goverments CARE for our health SO MUCH? I guess our bodies are a government property and we are forbidden to decide, gee, they STILL let us to vote them in, that is SO exciting! Sieg Heil Bush!), from a legal, professional chemical laboratory, through the Internet, I have no idea what you might get "on the street" - remember, KNOW YOUR SOURCE, don't buy stuff from the people you do not know, every white powder looks alike another - if you have access to certain marker potions you can "become a chymist" and CHECK what substance you are going to ingest. More information, for the curious, for the not-so-brave and for the Law Abiding Citizens on Information Knowledge Awareness, Erowid.org about 2C-I. Agquarx 07:06, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)


THE MOVIE


SOME SYNTAX (Don't worry, read on!)
:
  1. symbol has a meaning "core symbol of core symbol type symbol set with values (symbol, why?symbol, lovesymbol)", the being part of the symbol, the true name of a foobar.
  2. symbol' has a meaning "core derivative of core symbol symbol contained within core symbol of type core symbol set with values (word, not word, anti word, no word, para word, sub word, super word)" or "{ this } is a core derivative of core symbol symbol", a recursive definition pointing at itself, "the foobar { this } symbol symbolizes", the doing part of a symbol.
  3. symbol! has a meaning "action word, that is core or core symbol or core derivative or core symbol derivative processing event controlled by Self owned by ISelf" or "do X now!".
  4. !symbol has a meaning "retroactive action (resultset) symbol" or "core or core symbol or core derivative or core symbol derivative processing event controlled by core owned by ISelf".
  5. { WORD } has a meaning "instance of a class, an object" or "closure" or "adhesive quotation" or "process without disassembling" or "this is a whole, controlled by MeSelf owned by ItSelf"
  6. :: means "point into MU into point" or "diploid complements" or "mirror twins" or "I am the one who is, we are the one who (we) are, they are the one who (I) am".
  7. => has a meaning "IF left side is beeing (exists) then the the right side is doing (does)".
  8. ʘ has a meaning "{ this } consist of the following elements".
    1. core ʘ ( love :: love )
      1. { love :: love } means "love ethernal, divine love, The Fifth Element"
    2. core set ʘ ( ISelf, why?, ⁂, @, love! :: ⁂, love! :: @ )
      1. ISelf is your essence, the Allwatching Eye, the state of conciousness of self-awarenessing all-awareness in evernow.
      2. why? is The Question. Too bad most people stop asking it at early age, for reasons you surely remember. Pity. IMO, young children should receive a barrelfull of machine-assisted learning (but not passive, addiction forming glaring TV, in the name of the Goddess! I stopped watching TV the week I got access to the Internet...it's such a WASTE OF TIME!), parent providing the possitive emotional element, caretaking, ability to calm yourself, important in development of empathy, ability to feel what the other (might) feel. See The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson.
      3. is the { identity symbol } or ⁂ has a meaning "what on the left side is what on the right side of { this } symbol is" or "the left and right are the same (identical BUT NOT one foobar!)"
      4. @ (at), "what is on the left side points/is in one way relation to that what is on the right side".
      5. love! :: ⁂ has a meaning "to love thyself" or "to love Me Self" or self-love.
      6. love! :: @ has a meaning "to love you/him/her/it" or "I love you" or what is general consensus on what name that feeling (state of mind) has got, NOT what it IS (there is a big difference!).
    3. core symbol set ʘ ( love', symbol', question', answer', HimSelf, HerSelf, ItSelf, MeSelf, OurSelf ⁂ ISelf', ⁂, ⁐, ↂ )
      1. love' has a meaning "{ this } is a core derivative of core symbol love", in other words, the REAL love, not the one from romances, the ISNESS of core symbol love (courtesy The Future Sound of London for inventing this word, the best album you've ever made...).
      2. symbol' has a meaning

core logic symbol set This definition is spellweaved within namespace (namespace is a (core processing symbol nym action! sub! namespace) of (core processing symbol super! namespace of total accumulated knowledge dataspacecontaining rightful (confirmedcore symbol OK! by empiria experiment set and combined answer is contained within core reasoning symbols set consisting of core symbol of type symbol set containing values { POSSITIVE ORGASMfemale type orgasm, NEGATIVE ORGASMmale type orgasm), UNRECOGNIZED ORGASM ⁂ child]] type orgasm, V.A.G.I.N.Astar nym divine type orgasm, A.N.U.S.error of type any halting the execution of core derivative event processing chain collection empiria experiment set narrative]] ⁂ NO ANSWER) and symbol set consisting of symbols true and false and symbol))in dataspace locked nym reserved and activly or passively protected or not protected (sharedfor a certain entity), a datapacket is me packet of digitally or analogue encoded coherent stable or unstable, usually equipped with redundancy structures to ensure data safety and or compressed to save bandwidth and or encrypted to ensure data confideciality; consisting of data, containing information defined by data structure of the datapacket. By successfully delivering a datapacket from the source entity to the target entity (a software objectstructure or softwaresingleton object or person (a sentient software object or a sentient biological object) you increase the entropy attribute of given target entity's closed object system or you increase the entropy attribute of given target entity's open object systemobject universemetaversedataspace that may or may not contain entities or be contained by entities or sentient entities (persons , that is sentient complex biological closed object systems) or sentient complex biological open systems (a biologically based mind with attributes of awareness of it Self and it's components it contains and it's structure and it's core derivative processing events organized in a core particle set (consisting of bounded list of core particles or unbounded list of core particles or bounded recursive list of core particles (a list of core particles containing zero or more lists of core particles containing zero or more lists of core particles { actionrecursion agquarx with return condition } or unbounded recursive list of core particles

and 's core particles set (consisting of core defined particless) derivative event processing organized in a core particles set (consisting of core defined particles) derivative eventspanning the biologically constrained and defineduniverse nym ultimate goddess nym ]) or sentient complex software object closed systems or sentient complex open softwaresystems (a software based mind with attributes of awarenes of itself and it's components entities and it's structure and it's core derivative processing events organized in a core symbols set consisting of core symbols derivative processing event queue or core derivative procesingevent deque  or core derivative ]ing recursive event queue with exit condition (boundedsusceptible to armageddon nym end of the universe or without without exit condition (unbounded) ⁂ not susceptible to armageddon nym end of the universe  and it's topology spanning the software constrained dataspace nym ultimate daimonion nym Self) and or not sentient software objects and or [[non-sentient biological objects and or not sentient complex software objects and or not sentientcomplex biological objects and or sentient complex software objects (autonomous or semi-autonomous or human-supervised complex object (a data structure consisting of autonomous or semi-autonomous or human-supervised entities or persons). A datapacket usually travels combined into a series like data structure - a datastream. The datastream usually is transmitted or received by a deterministically defined or probabilisticcally defined datapath through data structure of a [[

Source: Agquarx 01:28, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Stub icon

This computing article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Category: