| Revision as of 05:59, 1 January 2007 editDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,616 edits Your recent request for checkuser← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:24, 1 January 2007 edit undoRiskAficionado (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,061 edits WP:RPANext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| You recently compiled and listed a case at ]. A ] or ] has requested you supply one or more ]s to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the ] page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for ], and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is ''']'''. Thanks for your co-operation. '''] <sup>] · ] ]</sup>''' 05:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC), '']''. | You recently compiled and listed a case at ]. A ] or ] has requested you supply one or more ]s to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the ] page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for ], and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is ''']'''. Thanks for your co-operation. '''] <sup>] · ] ]</sup>''' 05:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC), '']''. | ||
| == ] == | |||
| refactoring should be done by an independant party. refactoring possible "personal attacks" against oneself involves a conflict of interests. if we were all to do that, i imagine we would be refactoring eachother's comments excessively and unnecessarily. i personally don't see the comment as much of a personal attack. ] 16:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:24, 1 January 2007
Faith Freedom International
Yes, that is exactly what I meant. Please do keep watching for the edit warriors on this article, your creating it provides a magnet for every kind of POV warrior, but the way to start was exactly like this, with evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources. I will make Ali Sina a redirect. Guy (Help!) 21:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Faith Freedom
Great job there. Arrow740 04:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Your vote
Would you please care to explain why you voted against my steward election. All you've done is link to a User Talk page in which I am being insulted and my views and actions misrepresented. Bastiq▼e 20:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
I have replied on the relevant Meta-Wiki page. -- Karl Meier 22:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Islamophobia
Hi Karl, I see you've been working on the Islamophobia article. IF you have the time (and the inclination) you might want to write something about the new EU report that was just released. I'm going to try to read it soon but I haven't had the time. jaco♫plane 17:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've now done some significant restructuring, rationalising and generally cleaning up of this article. It needs more, but I have you will approve of the direction in which I've taken it. I believe it is now a much better base for us to work on. Metamagician3000 11:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Your recent request for checkuser
You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the requests for checkuser page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant 05:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk.
WP:RPA
refactoring should be done by an independant party. refactoring possible "personal attacks" against oneself involves a conflict of interests. if we were all to do that, i imagine we would be refactoring eachother's comments excessively and unnecessarily. i personally don't see the comment as much of a personal attack. ITAQALLAH 16:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)