Misplaced Pages

Talk:Firefox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:55, 20 September 2020 editViperSnake151 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers109,484 edits File:Firefox Logo, 2019.png and othersTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit Revision as of 00:01, 24 September 2020 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,575,347 edits Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2020-09-23. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTaggerNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:
|currentstatus=FFA |currentstatus=FFA
|otd2date=2019-09-23|otd2oldid=917248497 |otd2date=2019-09-23|otd2oldid=917248497
|otd3date=2020-09-23|otd3oldid=979727918
}} }}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=

Revision as of 00:01, 24 September 2020

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Firefox article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Former featured articleFirefox is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 28, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 25, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
February 10, 2007Featured article reviewKept
May 2, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
April 30, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 23, 2019, and September 23, 2020.
Current status: Former featured article
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMozilla (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mozilla, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MozillaWikipedia:WikiProject MozillaTemplate:WikiProject MozillaMozilla
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconInternet High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software / Free and open-source software Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Top-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconApple Inc. Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLinux High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconOpen (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen
Template:WP1.0

To-do list for Firefox: edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2013-08-09

As of 08/09/13, the Firefox article requires the following to be completed:

  • Address problems identified in the peer review:
    • Update sections that are marked as outdated
    • Replace Mozilla references with a third-party source
    • References need a publisher & access date
  • Expand the lead section to better summarize key points of the article using Misplaced Pages guidelines


Section sizes
Section size for Firefox (32 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 11,624 11,624
History 22,902 22,902
Features 8,832 26,416
Browser extensions 3,264 3,264
Themes 1,159 1,159
Guest session 1,439 1,439
Standards 11,722 11,722
Security 10,704 10,704
Privacy 13,441 13,441
Localizations 2,238 2,238
Platform availability 5,108 45,780
Microsoft Windows 8,166 8,166
macOS 5,873 5,873
Linux 1,378 1,378
Firefox for Android 8,531 8,531
Firefox for iOS 7,571 7,571
Firefox Reality (AR/VR) 1,253 1,253
Unofficial ports 7,900 7,900
Channels and release schedule 7,878 7,878
Licensing 4,798 4,798
Trademark and logo 6,987 13,516
Branding and visual identity 6,529 6,529
Promotion 9,407 9,407
Performance 18 17,117
2000s 7,809 7,809
2010s 7,621 7,621
Firefox Quantum 1,669 1,669
Usage share 7,480 7,480
See also 231 231
References 30 30
Further reading 1,288 1,288
External links 1,330 1,330
Total 196,180 196,180

Template:Notareferencedesk

Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17



This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Is Firefox "free"?

The top part of the article says Firefox is a "free and open-source" web browser, however I was under the impression that parts of Firefox were non-free (free-as-in-freedom). Is this accurate? --Sebastian Hudak (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

It is released without cost to the person who installs and uses it, so it is free. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:30, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
"Free" when used as "Free and open-source" doesn't refer to cost, it refers to "freedom", mainly the program's license and the rights it gives to the users. I was under the impression that parts of Firefox were "non-free". Cost is irrelevant to "freedom". Sorry for the confusion. --Sebastian Hudak (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
That's one interpretation of what free and open-source software means. There are four freedoms and none of those appear to be contravened by Firefox. Which are you concerned with? Which do you have sources to support that contravention? Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
The Firefox branding (e.g. logo) is non-free. Everyone may compile a completely free version of Firefox, but without using its branding. This was once an issue for Debian and Ubuntu. See Iceweasel. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
It is requested that edits be made to the following semi-protected articles:

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.


I work for Mozilla so changing this very important page might be a CoI. Mozilla announced a change in the Firefox brand (https://blog.mozilla.org/opendesign/firefox-the-evolution-of-a-brand/) where Firefox will be the masterbrand and the spezific products have specific names. Firefox therefor does not reference anymore just the browser but more products so this page should imo move to Firefox_browser and Firefox should be an overview of all products of the umbrella brand. Rraue (talk) 09:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

  • @Rraue: Thank you for disclosing your conflict of interest. Per WP:Official names, until Firefox browswer catches on as the common use of the name, the article's title should remain as is. Also, please sign your edits by inserting 4 of these: ~ before publishing your edit. Thank you! Orville1974 13:55, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

A majority of modern day browsers are free and make money of ads, or in Firefox's case donations/royalties. Drakesdrs1 (talk) 15:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Firefox browser and Firefox product family

Can this page be separated into two pages, one for the browser, and one for the product family? SportsFan007 (talk) 08:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

I'm going to personally lean towards no. While I did notice the new Firefox 70 icon, the Firefox.com site still prominently shows the web browser, and the other Firefox software (Lockwise password manager, Monitor privacy check, Send temporary file upload and Pocket bookmark service) are all complimentary aka. add-ons or web services, although some have dedicated apps and/or support non-Firefox browsers. All this to say, the Firefox name generally refers to the browser. For other uses, a disambiguation page is more than enough. --LABcrabs (talk) 22:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Fx shifted from 6 to 4 weeks between versions

I guess the part concerning updates needs updating. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Firefox Logo, 2019.png and others

Mozilla is undergoing a transition to these logos, it seems. Maybe someone can put something in about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seemplez (talkcontribs) 11:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

This logo is for the Firefox brand (which now encompasses multiple properties). Firefox Browser (née Mozilla Firefox) still uses the existing logo but with an art style patterned upon it. ViperSnake151  Talk  23:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Should we specify that OS X 10.9-10.11 is supported with ESR releases?

In the infobox and system requirements table, I've noted that OS X 10.9-10.11 are supported by the ESR channel, but 10.12 is needed for the standard release. However, this goes against the precedent of the last time this happened, when OS X 10.6-10.8 were dropped in 2016. Should I leave it the way I edited it until 2021, or just immediately bump the requirements to macOS 10.12?Herbfur (talk) 15:35, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Categories: