Misplaced Pages

Talk:John Connor: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:43, 30 December 2006 editThe 80s chick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers11,089 edits →Age← Previous edit Revision as of 20:21, 2 January 2007 edit undo70.109.136.128 (talk) →AgeNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:
Explain!--Tim Explain!--Tim
:I haven't listened to any commentaries or watched any behind-the-scenes documentaries that might explain this, but from what I'm guessing, the makers of ''Terminator 3'' were either not aware of the canon established by the previous movies, or they didn't care about it. -- ] 06:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC) :I haven't listened to any commentaries or watched any behind-the-scenes documentaries that might explain this, but from what I'm guessing, the makers of ''Terminator 3'' were either not aware of the canon established by the previous movies, or they didn't care about it. -- ] 06:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

EVula likes ass!

Revision as of 20:21, 2 January 2007

WikiProject iconFilm Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

I seek John Connor. --Cyberman 06:45, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

Should we add to the disambiguation page John Connors, the former CFO of Microsoft?--Whirling 07:39, August 1, 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup

The information in this article is organized like some sort of fansite, with all this pseudo-roleplaying in the writing. Just look at this thing:

July 24th, 2004 (Judgement Day)

The third terminator to be sent back in time is the T-X, which was sent to 1:14 AM July 24th, 2004. Unlike it's two predecessors, the T-X's primary objective was to terminate the following young people who would become John's generals in the future:

  1. Anderson, Elizabeth (Terminated)
  2. Anderson, William (Terminated)
  3. Barrera, José (Terminated)
  4. Brewster, Katherine
  5. Brewster, Robert (Terminated)
  6. ???
  7. Holand, ???
  8. ???, Ted
  9. ???

That is not how an encyclopedia article on a work of fiction should go. Especially the whole bit with the "Terminated" next to the names.--Foot Dragoon 05:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Age

Was John Connor really 13 in Terminator 2, as stated in Terminator 3? I thought he was 10 in T2?--Tim

He was 10. That was a major continuity error by the makers of Terminator 3. - Annie D 22:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Why did the writers change Connor's age from 10 to 13, and why was it allowed to stay that way to begin with?--Tim
Personal opinion: because the script for T3 was crap. There are several other discrepancies that, quite frankly, shouldn't exist. EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Explain!--Tim

I haven't listened to any commentaries or watched any behind-the-scenes documentaries that might explain this, but from what I'm guessing, the makers of Terminator 3 were either not aware of the canon established by the previous movies, or they didn't care about it. -- Annie D 06:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

EVula likes ass!

Categories: