Misplaced Pages

Talk:Bessarabia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:56, 31 January 2005 editAndriyK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,870 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 12:59, 31 January 2005 edit undoAndriyK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,870 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
------------------- -------------------
Dear AAAAA, Dear AAAAA,
you write an ecyclopedia article on Bessarabia, not an article on antisemitizm or Jewish history. you write an ecyclopedia article on Bessarabia, not an article on anti-Semitism or on Jewish history.


If anybody would "try to ADD more information" to balance your information, this would make the article too large If anybody would "try to ADD more information" to balance what you have written, this would make the article too large
and unsuitable for wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia article, not a monography on the history of Bessarabia, after all. and unsuitable for wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia article, not a monography on the history of Bessarabia, after all.


There is no such a rule, that the balance should be reachet just by addindg information, not by deliting it. There is no such a rule, that the balance should be reachet only by adding information, not by deliting it.


The NPOV policy is obligatory for everybody who edits the article. The NPOV policy is obligatory for everybody who edits the article.

Revision as of 12:59, 31 January 2005

Dear Wikipedians,

The changes to the article "Bessarabia" made at 19:46 on 30 Jan 2005 have nothing to do with vandalism. Their purpose is to make the article to conform the NPOV policy. If you do not agree, let us start a discussion, but do not merely revert the changes.

  • First of all, you should "Log In", so you can sign your statements and all your changes will show with the same ID.--AAAAA 12:28, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Secondly, the information you deleted is factual, unless you have information to the contrary. Instead of just deleting, you should try to ADD more information, if you think the article needs more balance.--AAAAA 12:28, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Dear AAAAA, you write an ecyclopedia article on Bessarabia, not an article on anti-Semitism or on Jewish history.

If anybody would "try to ADD more information" to balance what you have written, this would make the article too large and unsuitable for wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia article, not a monography on the history of Bessarabia, after all.

There is no such a rule, that the balance should be reachet only by adding information, not by deliting it.

The NPOV policy is obligatory for everybody who edits the article. It is not normal, if somebody makes obviously biased articles and other wikipedians have to correct this.

Regrads,

AndriyK