Misplaced Pages

:Requested moves: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:39, 4 January 2007 view sourceGTBacchus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Rollbackers60,420 edits Uncontroversial proposals: rm request that was moved to controversial secion← Previous edit Revision as of 07:06, 4 January 2007 view source Ev (talk | contribs)13,000 edits [] []Next edit →
Line 226: Line 226:


*'''] → ]''' —('']'')— 'Juraj Dalmatinac' is a false, 'translated' name of the Orsini's artist (Georgius Mathaei Dalmaticus) name - done in the 19th century —] 20:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC) *'''] → ]''' —('']'')— 'Juraj Dalmatinac' is a false, 'translated' name of the Orsini's artist (Georgius Mathaei Dalmaticus) name - done in the 19th century —] 20:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
*:Please, relist this one instead of closing it, for more debate is currently taking place regarding a third option: ''Giorgio da Sebenico''. - Best regards, ] 07:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


*'''] → ]''' —('']'')— As per Vasari, at baptism, Clovio's name was Giorgio Iulio, his family name was Clovi. The name 'Juraj Julije Klović' is invented name much later (three hundred years) after the artist' death —] 20:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC) *'''] → ]''' —('']'')— As per Vasari, at baptism, Clovio's name was Giorgio Iulio, his family name was Clovi. The name 'Juraj Julije Klović' is invented name much later (three hundred years) after the artist' death —] 20:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:06, 4 January 2007

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Misplaced Pages. For information on retitling files, categories, and other items, see § When not to use this page.

Before moving a page or requesting a move, please review the article titling policy and the guidelines on primary topics.

Any autoconfirmed user can move a page using the "Move" option in the editing toolbar; see how to move a page for more information. If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

  • Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. In such cases, see § Requesting technical moves.
  • Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
  • A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
  • A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
  • Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are typically processed after seven days. If consensus supports the move at or after this time, a reviewer will perform it. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved." When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time, or closed as "no consensus". See Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Misplaced Pages:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

When not to use this page

Shortcuts

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

Undiscussed moves

Shortcuts

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

  • No article exists at the new target title;
  • There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
  • It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Uncontroversial proposals

Only list here proposals that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete. Things like capitalization and spelling mistakes would be appropriate here. If there is any prior discussion as to the name of the article please link to it. If there is any possibility that the proposed page move could be opposed by anyone, do not list it in this section. If the move location appears as a red link you should be able to move the article using the move button of the top of the article's page and don't need to use this page

Please use {{subst:WP:RM2|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} for uncontroversial moves only; do not copy, paste, and edit previous entries. No dated sections are necessary, and no templates on the article's talk page are necessary.

If your request was not fulfilled, and was removed from this section, please relist it in the other proposals section below.


Other proposals

All of the proposals listed below need to have a discussion set up on talk page of the article to be moved. Please use the template {{subst:WP:RM|Old Page Name|Requested name|Reason for move}} and, if necessary, create a new dated section.

Please use the correct template: see the instructions above. Do NOT attempt to copy and paste formatting from another listing.

4 January 2007

  • The Hitchers (band from Limerick)The Hitchers —(Discuss)— The The Hitchers page originally contained the article now at The Hitchers (band from Limerick). Another article was created, "The Hitchers (band from Teeside)", and "The Hitchers" changed to a disambig between the two. The Teeside band article was successfully prodded, and the Limerick band article survived an AfD. The information on the Teeside band has been merged with the Limerick band article. I think that it would be more sensible to rename the only current article ("band from Limerick") back to "The Hitchers", but we need to retain the edit history, and we can't do a move while the redirect exists. As I see it, the ideal state of things will be to have the article text at The Hitchers with the edit history that's now at "band from Limerick", with "band from Limerick" and perhaps "band from Teeside" as redirects. —Tevildo 03:25, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

3 January 2007

2 January 2007

1 January 2007

31 December 2006

30 December 2006


Backlog

Move dated sections here after five days have passed.

29 December 2006

  • MarapetMarapets — "Marapets" is the correct name of the website/company, but "Marapet" is not. —18:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)QQ
I see that Marapets is a deleted article; is Marapet a recreation which is a candidate for speedy deletion? Gene Nygaard 16:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

28 December 2006

Relisting with survey to gauge consensus. -GTBacchus 04:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

27 December 2006

Actually this is not an uncontroversial move. And there has been plenty of discussion here:Template_talk:Taoism#School names. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Moved from uncontroversial proposals, as it's clearly not uncontroversial. Please do not copy discussions to this page. -GTBacchus 18:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

26 December 2006

23 December 2006

Categories: