Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/Fwdixon(2nd): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:27, 7 January 2007 editJesup (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,116 edits []: Accusation is retribution for reporting Marshalbannana← Previous edit Revision as of 17:05, 7 January 2007 edit undoMarshal2.0 (talk | contribs)12 edits commentsNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:
Since this is obviously retribution, I request that someone rule on this quickly and consider if any action against the accuser is appropriate. Thanks. — ] 04:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Since this is obviously retribution, I request that someone rule on this quickly and consider if any action against the accuser is appropriate. Thanks. — ] 04:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


I should also note that ] started re-inserting this text exactly 4 days after the previous inserter (]) was reported, and 4 days is the minimum age of a newuser before they can edit sprotected pages. Note also the deceptive summary for Jesup's last re-insertion before this case was opened: "m (sourced, looks better)" - marked as a minor edit. ] 17:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
;Conclusions ;Conclusions



Revision as of 17:05, 7 January 2007

User:Jesup

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Fwdixon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Jesup (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)


Report submission by
Marshal2.0 01:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


Evidence Repeated identical edits (now with misleading summaries, including "minor edit" to hide it from some) on Katana, and Stratemeyer Syndicate related pages. by User:Fwdixon and many, many other identical edits by him (and before page was semi-protected by anon-IP's identified as sockpuppets of him). Furthermore Jesup has been acused of Sockpupetry in the past.Marshal2.0 01
49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Comments

User:Marshal2.0 is apparently engaging in retribution for my reporting User:Marshalbannana (the self-admitted previous user-id of this user) here as a possible sockpuppet of User:Jacknicholson, and probably because when Marshalbannana tried to acquit himself on Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Jacknicholson(2nd) I undid his self-acquital. The Katana article had to be fully protected to deal with the repeated editwarring from anon-IP's and later Jacknicholson/Marshalbannana once it was semi-protected.

Even a cursory examination of my edits will show I'm not a sockpuppet. The "evidence" above isn't supported by my contribution logs or the logs of the various pages, which is probably why no edit links were included.

If you examine the previous case referenced about Fwdixon you'll see it was a totally bogus case where a user accused everyone who disagreed with him of puppetry (and I had only added a short comment on the talk page at that time), and the admin dismissed it almost immediately.

Since this is obviously retribution, I request that someone rule on this quickly and consider if any action against the accuser is appropriate. Thanks. — jesup 04:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I should also note that User:Jesup started re-inserting this text exactly 4 days after the previous inserter (User:Fwdixon) was reported, and 4 days is the minimum age of a newuser before they can edit sprotected pages. Note also the deceptive summary for Jesup's last re-insertion before this case was opened: "m (sourced, looks better)" - marked as a minor edit. Marshal2.0 17:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Conclusions