| Revision as of 10:46, 5 December 2020 editMelbourneStar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers82,994 edits General note: Unconstructive editing on Killing of George Floyd.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:52, 5 December 2020 edit undoObjective3000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,035 edits →Discretionary sanctions alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| ] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of ], such as the edit you made to ], did not appear constructive and has been ]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our ]. You can find information about these at our ] which also provides further information about ]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your ] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please read the article's FAQ (]) and open a discussion on the article's talk page, seeking a new consensus, if you wish. But unilaterally upending existing consensus is disruptive. Thank you,''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> —]<span style="color: #FF9F00;">☆</span>] 10:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC) | ] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of ], such as the edit you made to ], did not appear constructive and has been ]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our ]. You can find information about these at our ] which also provides further information about ]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your ] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please read the article's FAQ (]) and open a discussion on the article's talk page, seeking a new consensus, if you wish. But unilaterally upending existing consensus is disruptive. Thank you,''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> —]<span style="color: #FF9F00;">☆</span>] 10:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == Discretionary sanctions alert == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }} ] (]) 18:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC){{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 5 December 2020
Hi Alex
December 2016
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Chicago 1885 cholera epidemic myth has been reverted.
Your edit here to Chicago 1885 cholera epidemic myth was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhkxD6bD2AY) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Misplaced Pages's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
April 2020
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hospital-acquired infection have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Are.u.sure! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
December 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Killing of George Floyd, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please read the article's FAQ (here) and open a discussion on the article's talk page, seeking a new consensus, if you wish. But unilaterally upending existing consensus is disruptive. Thank you, —MelbourneStar☆ 10:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.