Revision as of 23:41, 9 December 2020 editMJL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors42,375 edits →Last warning: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:17, 10 December 2020 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,819 edits You have been blocked from editing for disruptive editing.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
Conduct like that is unacceptable, and Misplaced Pages does not allow people to continue to edit if they are only ] to ]. –<span style="font-family:CG Times, times">] ]<sup>]</sup></span> 23:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC) | Conduct like that is unacceptable, and Misplaced Pages does not allow people to continue to edit if they are only ] to ]. –<span style="font-family:CG Times, times">] ]<sup>]</sup></span> 23:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
== December 2020 == | |||
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''2 weeks''' for persistently making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] (]) 01:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> |
Revision as of 01:17, 10 December 2020
Welcome!
|
Discretionary sanctions alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
O3000 (talk) 01:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Template:Z33
Sorry you don't like the truth.03:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Guitarguy2323 (talk)
- Yeah! Everyone knows reality has a well-documented anti-Trump bias. Local Milk Person (talk) 23:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Nah just lefties :)Guitarguy2323 (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
W. Bush
Hello! Please do not remove George W Bush from the Republicans who oppose Trump without a reliable source that denounces the New York Times article. Feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions. Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 00:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Spokespeople are not considered reliable sources. At most, we would note that a spokesman disputed the Times report. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages without adequate explanation, as you did at List of Republicans who oppose the 2020 Donald Trump presidential campaign, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
LOL So if the New York Times said everyone should Jump off a cliff you would dispute that. So I guess the office of a president is no longer a reliable source :DGuitarguy2323 (talk) 01:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Once again, this was not the office of the president. This was the Texas tribune reporting what a spokesman said. If you have a source citing a website of the president or something like that, then please bring it up. Your analogy is humorous but definitely is not what this argument is about. Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
I hope this clarifies it. I did not mean to discourage you from editing, but your continual deletion was not based on a reliable source. Feel free to continue to make constructive edits. Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 01:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
This ] violates wp:npa, please reword it.Slatersteven (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Last warning
Conduct like that is unacceptable, and Misplaced Pages does not allow people to continue to edit if they are only here to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 23:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)