| Revision as of 01:59, 10 January 2007 editTruthbringerToronto (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,618 edits R. L. Wysong← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:02, 10 January 2007 edit undoPatriotBible (talk | contribs)582 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Welcome!''' | '''Welcome!''' | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
| The ] article includes a review of his book. A single review normally isn't enough to save an article from being deleted, but it's often a strong hint that a second review probably could be found if one were to look long enough. Articles about creationists are potentially valuable to people trying to understand the creationist viewpoint, even if the person reading the article has a sound grasp of evolutionary biology. The fact that someone holds an incorrect belief is not itself reason to delete the person's article. It is possible for such an individual also to be a notable author. --] (] | ] 01:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | The ] article includes a review of his book. A single review normally isn't enough to save an article from being deleted, but it's often a strong hint that a second review probably could be found if one were to look long enough. Articles about creationists are potentially valuable to people trying to understand the creationist viewpoint, even if the person reading the article has a sound grasp of evolutionary biology. The fact that someone holds an incorrect belief is not itself reason to delete the person's article. It is possible for such an individual also to be a notable author. --] (] | ] 01:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I didn't prod it because he's a creationist. He doesn't look notable, that's why its a prod and not an afd. Feel free to add to it. One book from 1974 of unknown origins and press is not convincing that he's notable. ] 02:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:02, 10 January 2007
Welcome!
Hello, PatriotBible, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -andrew|ellipsed... 09:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Unicerosaurus
I appreciate your fervor, but I think it's a better idea to let the article stand for all to see, rather than to remove it. J. Spencer 16:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
R. L. Wysong
The R. L. Wysong article includes a review of his book. A single review normally isn't enough to save an article from being deleted, but it's often a strong hint that a second review probably could be found if one were to look long enough. Articles about creationists are potentially valuable to people trying to understand the creationist viewpoint, even if the person reading the article has a sound grasp of evolutionary biology. The fact that someone holds an incorrect belief is not itself reason to delete the person's article. It is possible for such an individual also to be a notable author. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't prod it because he's a creationist. He doesn't look notable, that's why its a prod and not an afd. Feel free to add to it. One book from 1974 of unknown origins and press is not convincing that he's notable. PatriotBible 02:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)