Germanic peoples: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:34, 19 May 2003 editAndre Engels (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers20,762 editsm nl:← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:37, 4 June 2003 edit undoKarl Schalike (talk \| contribs)334 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	]]]]]		]]]]]

	The '''Germanic Peoples'''		The '''Germanic Peoples or Germanic Tribes'''

	The idea of a single German people, or ''Volk,'' is a relatively recent development, largely invented by ] and ] writers and politicians. ~~From~~ ancient times, ~~several~~ ~~ethnic~~ ~~groups~~ ~~have~~ ~~mixed~~ ~~to shape~~ the ]. ~~Even~~ ~~though~~ the ] ~~had often grouped several peoples under the name Germans, it~~ is doubtful that most of these groups viewed themselves as connected in any cultural, linguistic, or political sense. The formation of an eastern Frankish kingdom in the ] seems a watershed event in German development, although this kingdom featured a diversity of cultures and political allegiances. Most of the ] "German" rulers actually considered themselves kings of the Romans, and, later, Roman emperors. Not until the ] did the emperors officially add "of the German nation" to their title.		The idea of a single German people, or ''Volk,'' is a relatively recent development, largely invented by ] and ] writers and politicians. In ancient times, the many ] tribes were given the broad label as ](Latin Germanicus) by the ]. It is doubtful that most of these groups viewed themselves as connected in any cultural, linguistic, or political sense.
			These tribes wandered for centuries in far and diverse directions taking them to ] and ] at the northern tip of ] and as far south through present day ] and further south to ] ]. Over time, the wandering meant intrusions into other tribal territories and the ensuing wars for land claims escalated with the dwindling amount of unoccupied territory. Nomadic tribes then began the staking out of permanent homes as a means of protection. Much of this resulted in fixed settlements from which many, under a powerful leader, expanded outwards. A defeat meant either scattering or merging with the dominant tribe and this continued to be how nations were formed.

			'''Germanic tribes: '''
	(''Source: Microsoft Corporation, ].'')
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]
			*]


	~~The~~ Germanic ~~peoples~~ are frequently blamed in popular conceptions for the "Fall" of the Roman Empire in the late ]. Professional ] and ] have since the ] shifted their interpretations in such a way that the Germanic peoples are no longer seen as '''invading''' a decaying empire but as being '''co-opted''' into helping defend territory the central government could no longer adequately administer.		Some of the Germanic tribes are frequently blamed in popular conceptions for the "Fall" of the Roman Empire in the late ]. Professional ] and ] have since the ] shifted their interpretations in such a way that the Germanic peoples are no longer seen as '''invading''' a decaying empire but as being '''co-opted''' into helping defend territory the central government could no longer adequately administer.

	The presence of successor states controlled by an ethnically Germanic nobility is clear in the ]. How they got there is the substance of the debate today. Perhaps more important in the ] of the ] and the ] of the ] has been the debate about exactly what "tribe" or "people" meant to these groups, whose fluidity and willingness to blend is clear from the written record. The late classical sources are especially clear in the matter of the blended nature of the ].		The presence of successor states controlled by an ethnically Germanic nobility is clear in the ]. How they got there is the substance of the debate today. Perhaps more important in the ] of the ] and the ] of the ] has been the debate about exactly what "tribe" or "people" meant to these groups, whose fluidity and willingness to blend is clear from the written record. The late classical sources are especially clear in the matter of the blended nature of the ].

Revision as of 17:37, 4 June 2003

The Germanic Peoples or Germanic Tribes

The idea of a single German people, or Volk, is a relatively recent development, largely invented by 19th and 20th centuries writers and politicians. In ancient times, the many barbarian tribes were given the broad label as Germanic tribes(Latin Germanicus) by the Romans. It is doubtful that most of these groups viewed themselves as connected in any cultural, linguistic, or political sense. These tribes wandered for centuries in far and diverse directions taking them to England and Scandinavia at the northern tip of Europe and as far south through present day Europe and further south to Mediterranean Africa. Over time, the wandering meant intrusions into other tribal territories and the ensuing wars for land claims escalated with the dwindling amount of unoccupied territory. Nomadic tribes then began the staking out of permanent homes as a means of protection. Much of this resulted in fixed settlements from which many, under a powerful leader, expanded outwards. A defeat meant either scattering or merging with the dominant tribe and this continued to be how nations were formed.

Germanic tribes:

Some of the Germanic tribes are frequently blamed in popular conceptions for the "Fall" of the Roman Empire in the late 5th century. Professional historians and archaeologists have since the 1950s shifted their interpretations in such a way that the Germanic peoples are no longer seen as invading a decaying empire but as being co-opted into helping defend territory the central government could no longer adequately administer.

The presence of successor states controlled by an ethnically Germanic nobility is clear in the 6th century. How they got there is the substance of the debate today. Perhaps more important in the last decade of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st has been the debate about exactly what "tribe" or "people" meant to these groups, whose fluidity and willingness to blend is clear from the written record. The late classical sources are especially clear in the matter of the blended nature of the Alamanni.

Individuals and small groups from Germanic tribes had long been recruited from the limes or border regions of the Roman world and had risen high in the command structure of the army -- Odoacer, who deposed Romulus Augustulus is an example. In the later empire the government began to recruit whole tribal groups under their native leaders as officers.

The Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Vandals were converted to Christianity while they were still outside the bounds of the Empire; however, they were converted to the Arian heresy rather than to orthodox Catholicism. The one great written remnant of the Gothic language is a translation of portions of the Bible made by Ulfilas, the missionary who converted them. The Lombards were not converted until after their entrance into the Empire, but received Christianity from Arian Germanic groups.

The Franks were converted directly from paganism to Catholicism without an intervening time as Arians.

Batavii -- Bavarii -- Burgundians -- Frisians -- Saxons