This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) at 19:02, 25 February 2021 (→A motion has been proposed which relates to you: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:02, 25 February 2021 by Dreamy Jazz (talk | contribs) (→A motion has been proposed which relates to you: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) /
Proposed decision posted at the open Kurds and Kurdistan case
In the open Kurds and Kurdistan arbitration case, a number of remedies and finding of facts have been proposed, some of which relate to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 16:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Pronouns
GPinkerton has made it clear that they do not like being referred to using feminine pronouns. Please do not continue to do so. SQL 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Didn't know, thought Gp was a women.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 21:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- The best advice I can give you - is that if someone hasn't told you how to refer to them on-wiki (some people have this in their userpages, some even in signatures, some have mentioned in places over the years) - it's best to just use neutral pronouns. I apologize for the appearance of a pile-on, by the way. I hadn't seen that L235 had said something on the arbitration case talkpage as well. SQL 22:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed
An arbitration case regarding Kurds and Kurdistan has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.
- GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the English Misplaced Pages. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Thepharoah17 (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- عمرو بن كلثوم (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Supreme Deliciousness (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Paradise Chronicle is warned to avoid casting aspersions and repeating similar uncollegial conduct in the future.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 14:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed
- Dreamy Jazz, the tp says "topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed", does this only apply to article edits? So am I still allowed to discuss at talkpages about the topic? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I have referred the matter to arbcom. I should have an answer to you soon. Dreamy Jazz 22:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Dreamy Jazz, the tp says "topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed", does this only apply to article edits? So am I still allowed to discuss at talkpages about the topic? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:ARCA notification
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Kurds and Kurdistan and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, BDD (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- By the way, this was an entirely acceptable edit under WP:BANEX, though erring on the side of caution in the case of a topic ban is always wise. --BDD (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Moved to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Motions#Kurds and Kurdistan: topic ban clarification. I apologize for the confusion. --BDD (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
A motion has been proposed which relates to you
A motion has been proposed which clarifies the scope of your topic ban. The motion, if it passes, will remove the phrase "articles related to" from the wording of your topic ban, to clarify that the topic ban was intended to apply everywhere and not just in article space. This motion and clarification is because of a error which was not noticed, and is not because due to any edits or actions you have made since the topic ban was implemented. The motion is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Motions § Kurds and Kurdistan: topic ban clarification. Dreamy Jazz 19:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)