Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jiang

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Heimdal (talk | contribs) at 16:47, 21 February 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:47, 21 February 2005 by Heimdal (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Note: Unless you specify that you will be monitoring this page, I will respond to you on your talk page instead of mine. But if you want a speedier response or any response at all, answer on this page since I will probably forget to check yours.

POST A COMMENT

Archived versions: 18VIII03 | 21X03 | 30XII03 | 21II04 | 17IV04 | 07VI04 | 28VII04 | 2X04 | 5XII04 | 18II05


Hello Jiang,
I would be ready to compromise with you over the Germany article.
I shall remove all the subsections of the article's chapters (with subsections I mean sections like "Holy Roman Empire", "German Empire", "First World War" etc in the History chapter, for example). That would automatically shorten the article. The idea with the subsections originally came to me when studying the structure of the Japan article - see for example the chapter "Society" there, which I copied and which you dissolved. Since they appear to offend you, the subsections will go.
You in turn will need to accept that the text of the article will not be shortened. The paragraph about the "Holy Roman Empire" for example will be reinstated, although it will no longer be a subsection but a simple paragraph. Likewise, the piece about "Foreign affairs", which you rechristened "Foreign relations" - and which for some unknown reason you placed behind the "Economy" chapter, of all places - will be put back into "Politics", though as a simple paragraph, not as a subsection.
Another point is your decision to remove my title "Parliament" above the piece about the Bundestag and the Bundesrat, and to rename it "Government". But in a parliamentary democracy like Germany's, parliament and government are not one and the same thing. In the Japan article, for example, the subsection about the parliament is rightly called "The Diet", NOT "Government".
So do us all a favour, ask AllyUnion to unblock the article. You have time to consider until next Monday, as I shall be away over the weekend.
Heimdal 13:58, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Jiang, I do not even intend to discuss with you any further, as long as you keep the article blocked. I do not want to explain to you why it is wrong to rename the Holy Roman Empire "Imperial Germany", and what is the democratic principle of the separation of powers. Go to your university library and look it up in a dictionary if you don't know. Apart from this, it would be befit you if you were a little less arrogant, yes? - Heimdal 16:47, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)