This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Black Kite (talk | contribs) at 18:51, 15 December 2021 (Yeah, when you start with "your recent disgraceful comments" you don't get to have a conversation here). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:51, 15 December 2021 by Black Kite (talk | contribs) (Yeah, when you start with "your recent disgraceful comments" you don't get to have a conversation here)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | “Libraries gave us power" Manic Street Preachers |
| Black Kite Hi, I'm an administrator here, and have been since 2007. I'll try to answer any questions here as soon as I can, though I do have periods where I'm not available. For admins: if you think I've done something really f***ing stupid and I don't respond to a question about it, please feel free to reverse it ... we can work it out later on. |
| For Talk Page Archives, click here. |
| If you email me via Misplaced Pages, please leave me a note here (unless there's a good reason you do not want that fact to be public). I do check my Misplaced Pages email fairly regularly, but not that regularly. |
WP:BLPCAT violation again on religious converstion pages
Can you please take a look at List of converts to Islam from Hinduism? Last time, several entried were removed before the article was protected. Now another editor doing the same like a previous blocked sock and . Thanks. --Bringtar (talk) 16:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Time to close AFD
This article's Mister Sister (film) AFD here has been listed for deletion three times now, and the third list has gone beyond 7 days. I think that's it's time to close it.Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
McCullough/Ayurveda
Black Kite, you implemented an arbitration enforcement remedy at Talk:Ayurveda in which comments that solely complain about "quackery" without any policy basis are removed without comment. I am wondering if a similar remedy might help at Talk:Peter A. McCullough, which has experienced months of comments that dispute "misinformation", which is well-sourced, but provide no PAG reasoning for doing so. There have been five such comments posted in the last week.
If you'd prefer, I think this request could reasonably be posted at AE, where other admins can discuss the idea. Either way, I would appreciate your thoughts on whether it's reasonable or if there are better methods to alleviating the disruption. Thanks, Firefangledfeathers 16:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)