Talk:2008 United States presidential election

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Community Tech bot (talk | contribs) at 20:37, 2 October 2022 (Files used on this page or its Wikidata item are up for deletion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:37, 2 October 2022 by Community Tech bot (talk | contribs) (Files used on this page or its Wikidata item are up for deletion)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2008 United States presidential election article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 12 months

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

2008 United States presidential election was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 2, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
May 12, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
March 10, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Barack Obama (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama

Template:WikiProject Joe Biden Template:WikiProject Hillary Clinton

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Presidential elections Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2008.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

November 6 to 12, 2016 (12th)
November 1 to 7, 2020 (8th)

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Noam Cohen (2008-11-09). "Updating a Reference Site on the Fly". The New York Times.
(none) (August 17, 2009). "The 50 most-viewed Misplaced Pages articles in 2009 and 2008". The Daily Telegraph.

Protection

Can someone put this page under protection people have been vandalizing this page for the past few days.

Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add a section to Controversies

Negativity

The 2008 election, despite its high turnout and unusual enthusiasm, also featured attack ads from both campaigns which were deemed to be unusually provocative. McCain, for example, had released an ad that erroneously claimed that Obama had supported sex education for Kindergarteners.

https://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/15/west.negative/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/14/campaign.wrap/index.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec3aC8ZJZTc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVLQhRiEXZs 64.63.171.178 (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. It does not appear there is consensus for this addition. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 June 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Bring back colors to mark candidates who won states in the close states section. Editor57839 (talk) 22:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Not done for now: This is actually a controversial edit, so you'll need to discuss first with other editors. Please open a new section here and start a discussion. As per article's history, the colors were removed due to violation of MOS:ACCESS. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Colors

The colors in the close state sections were removed as detailed above. It seems that the other election pages have the color for the states, so should it be added back, or should they be removed from other pages? Either way, I believe the pages should be consistent.2601:241:300:B610:DF0:BFA8:41AE:6CFE (talk) 23:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 June 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the "International reactions" subsection under the "Results" section, please remove the link to International reactions to the 2008 United States presidential election, as the article has been deleted. 2601:241:300:B610:F5EF:BF57:495A:25EB (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 16:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Obama Sign Arlington Virginia.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Categories: