This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nseidm1 (talk | contribs) at 18:51, 1 March 2007 (complete revant, much more work to be done including a history of the precedent technology. I have many citations to add!!! Be patient.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:51, 1 March 2007 by Nseidm1 (talk | contribs) (complete revant, much more work to be done including a history of the precedent technology. I have many citations to add!!! Be patient.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This article may contain excessive or inappropriate references to self-published sources. Please help improve it by removing references to unreliable sources where they are used inappropriately. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | This article or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This redirect was last edited by Nseidm1 (talk | contribs) 17 years ago. (Update timer) |
HHO Gas contains the following molecular arrangements according to gas chromatography published in the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. H2,H5,H4O,H6O,H7O,O2,HO2,H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide),O3,H1O3,H2O3,H3O3,H1O4,H2O4,O5. Oxyhydrogen only has H2 and O2 therefore these additional molecular structure are the claimed difference between HHO Gas and Oxyhydrogen.
Claimed Production Method
HHO Gas is produced in a common ducted electrolyzer much like the original by Yull Brown, William Rhodes, George Wiseman, Kim San Nam, and a slew of other inventors. The electrolyzer does not separate the product hydrogen and oxygen via independent ducting, and allows them to mix immediately after production. This creates the molecular isomers and allotropes listed above.
History
This technology has been around since the origional common ducted electrolyzer invented by William Rhodes in 1966.
Criticism
Although peer review publication of the gas chromatography clearly identifies extra molecular structures in addition to H2 and O2, the reason for the formation of these structures has not been discussed in peer review. This technology performs according to the 1'st and 2'nd laws of electrolysis, with the only difference between it's production and Oxyhydrogen is the design of the electrolyzer being common ducted. Because of its production method being a technical design specification, prevailing skeptics, such as James Randi, have refuted this technology to be little more than a combination of pseudoscience and conventional electrolysis, which has been known about for well over a century.
Noah Seidman claims that the recent broadcast did not accurately describe the simple nature of common ducted electrolyzers, along with the long history. Effort was made by the media to cast a shroud of "special" over the technology, which is blatantly false, as this technology has been around for decades and is completely consistent with the laws of electrolysis set forth by Michael Farraday in 1832. Noah Seidman also claims that this technology has been gross portrayed by the most recent Fox News Broadcast.
Precedent Brand Names
This gas is given a variety of names, such as HHO gas (Hybrid Hydrogen Oxygen), Brown's Gas (for Yull Brown), Rhodes Gas, or Green Gas. It is claimed to contain a variety of hydrogen and oxygen allotropes in accordance with the "magnecule" theory proposed by controversial physicist Ruggero Santilli; for example, according to chromatography there are small quantities of 5 atom hydrogen allotropes, and large quantities of 5 atom oxygen allotropes. The magnecule theory also makes claims about monatomic hydrogen and oxygen existing at relatively low pressures and temperatures. Klein holds several patents and patents pending on products for high-tech industries, such as US application 20,060,075,683 .
See also
References
- Santilli, Ruggero Maria (2006). "A new gaseous and combustible form of water". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 31 (9): pp. 1113-1128. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.11.006.
{{cite journal}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help);|pages=has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|month=ignored (help) (Excerpt) - Template:Cite Patent ()
- "Fire water". Swift: Online Newsletter of the JREF. May 26, 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-01.
- "That HHO iddea isn't new". Swift: Online Newsletter of the JREF. June 9, 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-01.