Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 209.23.254.18 (talk) at 14:47, 9 December 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

life}} }}

This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Misplaced Pages rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source: Chus Martinez on Plushophilia, 2014

Archives

Talk:Yiff Archive June 2005 – December 2005 January 2006 – June 2006 July 2006 – August 2006 September 2006 – December 2006 January 2007 – April 2007 May 2007 – July 2007 August 2007 – October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 – June 2008 July 2008 – September 2008 October 2008 – September 2009 October 2009 – May 2011 June 2011 – December 2011 January 2012 – December 2012 January 2013 – January 2022 January 2022 – Present

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Image replacement proposal

Hey folks, I'm here to discuss the article in the quickest possible way. I recently made a cropped version of the original (pictured) because it was "oversexualized and unrepresentative." What do y'think about replacing an existing image with a new one?

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 05:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC); edited: 07:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Is there any good reason why the article needs to be illustrated with artworks anyway? This is an article about a group of people, not a cartoon, and article illustrations are supposed to show the subject matter. Commons has many good photos of individuals in its 'fursuits' category and subcategories: we should be able to find one amongst that if none of the existing photos used in our article aren't suitable to go at the top of the page. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

There's nothing "good" about finding different photos instead of artworks where everything is just irrelevant to what you prefer. Therefore, I won't help you with improving the article anyway.

The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 21:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC); edited: 21:48, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

I quite like the image proposed , the artstyle is more representative and feels more relevant of the fandom currently. People remember first impressions the most and that is most likely going to be the first image they see so it should be good artwork that represents the fandom in it's current state. The current picture doesn't look like a "a typical furry character" like you see online, atleast not anymore. 10fps man (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

i agree! though, if the image proposed does end up being used in the article, some credit to the artist should be provided. a link wouldn't be needed obviously, but providing their online handle and the platform the work appeared on would be a good idea. it might also be a good idea to ask the artist if they would mind their work appearing on this article. Cat-with-the-'tism (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove "along with sport fans," (under the Sociological Aspects heading); it's an unnecessary comparison 2601:281:D17F:9DBD:5951:F070:B0AF:92D8 (talk) 10:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Yup, doesn't seem particularly relevant. I've removed it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists