Misplaced Pages

Talk:Tolkien's legendarium

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jc37 (talk | contribs) at 11:44, 16 April 2023 (question). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 11:44, 16 April 2023 by Jc37 (talk | contribs) (question)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articlesTolkien's legendarium has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 14, 2021. (Reviewed version).
WikiProject iconMiddle-earth GA‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Archiving icon
Archives

1


Unfinished Tales

I am surprised that Unfinished Tales is not even listed, let alone discussed. It is far more substantial than The Adventures of Tom Bombadil or Bilbo's Last Song, and I see no reason to exclude it, but I don't know Tolkien research particularly well, so I may be missing something?--Verbarson (talk) 21:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

We basically have to go by what scholars write; and no text article can (or should) be exhaustive, but I've managed to work in a brief mention. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Addition of unused David Day sources

Ok, you put the header here. I'll ask straight out: What is your issue with David Day? - jc37 11:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Categories: