This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grigoras.Iliescu (talk | contribs) at 08:05, 11 April 2007 (unblock me). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:05, 11 April 2007 by Grigoras.Iliescu (talk | contribs) (unblock me)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Grigoras.Iliescu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been banned by someone called Khoikhoi for being a "sockpuppet of banned user Bonaparte". This is not true and I invite suggestions on how to prove it. Could the issue be re-examined please.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been banned by someone called Khoikhoi for being a "sockpuppet of banned user Bonaparte". This is not true and I invite suggestions on how to prove it. Could the issue be re-examined please. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been banned by someone called Khoikhoi for being a "sockpuppet of banned user Bonaparte". This is not true and I invite suggestions on how to prove it. Could the issue be re-examined please. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been banned by someone called Khoikhoi for being a "sockpuppet of banned user Bonaparte". This is not true and I invite suggestions on how to prove it. Could the issue be re-examined please. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Welcome!
Hello, Grigoras.Iliescu, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Vreau să spun cu căldură unui frate basarabean: bun venit pe Wikipedie! Sper să vă placă aici şi să faceţi contribuţii valoroase! Biruitorul 17:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Transnistria
I see you've been active in the various minor Transnistria-related articles. This is good. However, your edits are mainly copycat POV (is it absolutely necessary to add the tautology "of Moldovan region of Transnistria (which is internationally recognised as part of the Republic of Moldova" at every mention of Transnistria?).
Additionally, I don't understand your widespread replacement of the Transnistria cataegory with the Moldova one. Please realize that Transnistria is already a subcategory of Moldova.
This edit of yours, (unexplained removal of a reliable source, replacing with a fact tag) was actually disruptive. Please refrain from such edits in the future, at least without any explanation of your actions. Thank you. --Illythr 03:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
Blocked as a sockpuppet |