This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jreferee (talk | contribs) at 16:03, 15 July 2007 (→[]: Added*). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:03, 15 July 2007 by Jreferee (talk | contribs) (→[]: Added*)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Aspergum
Perhaps if WP:INTERESTING were a notability criteria, but no. The article itself claims no notability (and started off as an advert), furthermore I can't seem to find any reference to it anywhere except for unreliable websites, and no media coverage whatsoever. I also couldn't find any notability criteria that applies specifically to medication or OTC meds, so apologies in advance if somehow this does deserve to stay and I just haven't seen the related policy.. Spazure 08:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
*Comment Er, I nominated this like I always do -- what did I break?? See me on my talk page to avoid clutter. Spazure 08:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The article "does not assert the importance or significance of its subject". --Malcolmxl5 10:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep, I've expanded and referenced it. Its notability lies in its role in the recognition of aspirin's usefulness as an antithrombotic agent. Gordonofcartoon 12:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Great, but what if the pain is in your jaw? ~ Infrangible 13:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- And does it lose its analgesic effect on the bedpost overnight? Gordonofcartoon 15:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - The notability criteria that applies to medication and everything else on Misplaced Pages is Misplaced Pages:Notability. Aspergum has received enough coverage in independent reliable sources so that a verifiable artice can be written on the topic. Thus, keep. -- Jreferee 16:02, 15 July 2007 (UTC)