This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Poochiedontsurf (talk | contribs) at 11:58, 22 October 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:58, 22 October 2007 by Poochiedontsurf (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Law Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Youth rights article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Citations
I removed the "not verified" tag as per new citations. In the future, please notate concerns individually with || or other appropriate tag. From here out, please do not add new content to the article without appropriate citations. - Freechild 20:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Rights and liberation
Are youth rights and youth liberation the same thing, as this article suggests? Or are they inherently different movements that aim for two unique ends? It seems to me that the Youth Rights Movement is about concessions, while the youth liberation movement - if there is one - is more anarchistic, calling for a specifically radical departure from the current condition of youth towards a fully-engendered personhood. Perhaps "youth liberation" doesn't deserve a seperate article, but at least its own section in the youth rights article might be called for. - Freechild 19:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Early commentary
Wait a minute, as long as a group can't vote on anything, how do they get things their way? How did women get suffrage? Men voted that in, right?
The role of youth in the development of the country
Let's go for it
Hey gais! I added NAMBLA and the Girl Love wiki to the list of websites advocating 'youth rights' because most of the article seems to suggest that organisations trying to prevent and mitigate the effects of abuse are in fact walking all over the rights of children.
Also, none of the legitimateorganisations you listed - and Americans for a Society Free from Age Restrictions is not legitimate, it's full of pedophiles, and the website is ultimately and totally hacked - call for a reduction in the age of consent. Prove it's full of pedophiles? Okay. They want to abolish the age of consent - ie. they want to repeal the law which lets adults have sex with children. Good enough?
Oh, and if you disagree with me, you're a child molester. Win. poochie 11:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Categories: