Misplaced Pages

User talk:72.83.118.69

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Haemo (talk | contribs) at 00:15, 31 October 2007 (decline). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:15, 31 October 2007 by Haemo (talk | contribs) (decline)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

August 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did to Bonnie Wright, you will be blocked from editing.

Repeated vandalism, personal attacks and abuse will not be tolerated. Aula 22:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Fred and George Weasley. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Faithlessthewonderboy 04:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not erase the warnings and notices given to you on your talk page. Such action is also considered vandalism, and will most likely be reverted because the notices are there as a record. If, after some time goes by, you'd like to archive them, feel free to do so on a separate page. However, recent notices should remain on the page. Thanks! 17:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Bobsmith319, you will be blocked from editing. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 01:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Bobsmith319. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dreadstar † 02:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Misplaced Pages as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Antandrus (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.83.118.69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not mess with Bobsmith319's page. My friend got on Misplaced Pages and I showed him the fight in the pregnancy's discussion page. While I was gone, he didn't to mess around with Bobsmith's page since he found his annoying. Anyway, please give me another chance... I don't wanna wait a week just to use Misplaced Pages again. Also what you mean with "Blocked again; I'm sure that's a huge surprise"

Decline reason:

Your friend's pretty nasty. Nasty enough to keep you off Misplaced Pages for a week. I'd be pretty angry at him if I were you. When you get back in a week, keep him away from your computer. — jpgordon 03:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alright, I'll take the week ban. Well sorry for the crap he caused. 72.83.118.69 03:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Bobsmith319. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. To the person who's not doing this, you might consider creating an account, since this IP is likely to be blocked again quite soon. delldot talk 03:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hey delldot, that Bobsmith kid put up a banner a few days ago on my talk page saying I was banned from editing at Misplaced Pages indefinitely. I don't want that kid messing with my Discussion page.

OK, but please don't mess with his page either. delldot talk 04:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Weasley family, you will be blocked from editing. --Max Talk (+) 05:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I was about to undo it, but you beat me to it. I'll use the sandbox from now on. 72.83.118.69 05:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

All right, thank you.--Max Talk (+) 05:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Avro Tudor, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Avro Tudor was changed by 72.83.118.69 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-03T03:11:08+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 07:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. jpgordon 15:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.83.118.69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That is the biggest crap I've ever heard! First of all I only did some minor vandalism yesterday, but I stopped within minutes. The only way you could pin me for major vandalism is if you counted the stuff I did to the Sandbox. If you're going to block me atleast then don't do it for a month! That is just pure crap! Really it is.

Decline reason:

Actually, it appears that you were engaging in vandalism for a good hour. This isn't your first block and they escalate each time. Denied. — IrishGuy 23:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2007

Please stop restoring the abusive comment made at Talk:Pregnancy. If you continue to restore it, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Ginkgo100 01:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Abusive... yeah, wtf. If you feel that my comment is abusive, then you might as well delete 90% of the other comments that were directed toward Bobsmith's crazy rant about removing the nude image. All I'm saying is that I find it funny that he is threating to report people when they reply to him about how he is forcing his beliefs on other people. The only reason you see my comment as "trolling" was because at the same time I first posted it, I decide to attack Bobsmith's profile. Its not trolling, it just a simple comment to Bobsmith. 72.83.118.69 15:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeatedly adding trolling comments. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.83.118.69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wow... the lady can't even give me an answer about why it is considered trolling. I ask her a simple question and she rudely ignores it. If you're gonna block me atleast answer the freakin' question above. Heck, I bet she doesn't even have a legitimate answer to the question. Apparently she just considering my post as trolling because of my history, not because its actually trolling.

Decline reason:

Reviewing your contributions and your block log, it's clear you have a lengthy history of inappropriate behavior around the wiki, and that you have repeatedly ignored any and all requests to contribute more productively. Misplaced Pages is not a chat forum, nor is it open to flames, nor do many people appreciate disruptive behavior on user talk pages (blanking, nonsense comments, and such). If your primary goals are attacking or harassing other users, you're very likely to be blocked. If you fail to get the message after one or two blocks, the duration of those blocks will only increase over time. We're here to write an encyclopedia -- if you're not here to do that, you may want to find another website. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.83.118.69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Let me make this plain and clear, this block is nothing but crap. I did nothing except bring back a post that Ginkgo100 considers trolling for some reason. She can't even give me an answer to the above question, which really pissed me off. How about you guys wait till I actually do something WRONG before you block me. I did nothing wrong, that post was not trolling, trolling is this "BOBSMITH YOU'RE A FAG GET OFF WIKIPEDIA!". That post toward Bobsmith was tame, not trolling. This time you guys have no right to ban me, especially for a month. THAT WAS NOT TROLLING!

Decline reason:

Being abusive to other editors is disruptive. Abusing the unblock template is disruptive. Removing block reviews is disruptive. Your edit history betrays a look history of being disruptive in a wide variety of forms. — Haemo 00:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User infoThis is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.