Misplaced Pages

User talk:HalfShadow

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ReyBrujo (talk | contribs) at 04:08, 5 November 2007 (→Re: The only time I've ever seen the featured get a protect is when it's taking an absolutely massive pounding: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:08, 5 November 2007 by ReyBrujo (talk | contribs) (→Re: The only time I've ever seen the featured get a protect is when it's taking an absolutely massive pounding: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 02 days are automatically archived to User talk:HalfShadow/Archive 2. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

George W. Bush talk page edit summary

Classic. You have my respect. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 00:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


Cookie

Per your request on my talk page. An admin aims to please. (Someone else will have to handle the chocolate milk, though.) User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward5b

Sheridan College

And according to this, which I only just found, it is the second largest. But, what the Hell is that even based on? I am so confused!!! http://www-acad.sheridanc.on.ca/BUSM25315/bruzzeda/indexj.htm

Sheridan College Followup

Ah, don't worry about it. Thanks, all the same!

Smile!

This template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions

Re: The only time I've ever seen the featured get a protect is when it's taking an absolutely massive pounding

I prefer to block vandals attacking the featured articles than protecting it. That would give vandals only two chances of attack, the first one to get a {{bv-n}} tag, the second to get blocked. Based on that, unless editors are attacking persons (libel information being added, contact information being included, etc), I think we can handle any article being open for editing (as you say, there are as many users watching it as those vandalizing it). -- ReyBrujo 04:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)