Misplaced Pages

Talk:Neutral reportage

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JustaHulk (talk | contribs) at 00:44, 2 January 2008 (rem WP:BLP issue; if it cannot go in the article, it sure can't go here. The issue is not what is in the paper - the issue is that you understand the concerns that multiple editors have alerted to). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:44, 2 January 2008 by JustaHulk (talk | contribs) (rem WP:BLP issue; if it cannot go in the article, it sure can't go here. The issue is not what is in the paper - the issue is that you understand the concerns that multiple editors have alerted to)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neutral reportage article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Barbara Schwarz vs Salt Lake Tribune

I have been accused of trying to reinsert inappropriate WP:BLP information deleted when Ms Schwarz's article was removed. This article though already mentioned her case against the paper. Since there are secondary sources discussing her case, we're obligated to do so as well.

As this article applies to how laws about defamation work in regard to journalism, her notability here should be related to the latter. Anynobody 06:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Undid revision 181336707 by Anyeverybody (talk) Read BPL rules again, it does violate. An editor reverted the last edit with this edit summary, since they didn't post here as well I'm assuming they meant for the summary to speak for them here too. Which part(s) is/are a violation and why?

Her case was notable enough to be listed before and notable enough to be mentioned now. I'm simply describing and quoting the sources. I've been trying to minimize the amount discussion to just the basics of the case, but the source also elaborates on her more pertinent arguments too. Anynobody 23:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)